Dropout and Abstinence Outcomes in a National Text Messaging Smoking Cessation Intervention for Pregnant Women, SmokefreeMOM: Observational Study

JMIR mHealth and uHealth - Tập 7 Số 10 - Trang e14699
Kristyn Kamke1, Emily Grenen2, Cendrine Robinson3, Sherine El‐Toukhy1
1Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
2ICF, Rockville, MD, United States
3Remove, Remove, MD, United States

Tóm tắt

Background Population-level text messaging smoking cessation interventions may reduce racial and ethnic differences in smoking among pregnant women. Objective Our objective was to examine racial and ethnic differences in dropout, response, and abstinence rates among users of a US national, publicly available text messaging cessation intervention targeting pregnant women, SmokefreeMOM. Methods Participants were online subscribers to SmokefreeMOM who set a prospective quit date within the 9 months before their due date. We examined demographics, smoking frequency, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and prequit time (up to 14 days of preparation time before quit date) as correlates of response rate and abstinence at 8 time points: quit date, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28, day 35, day 42 (intervention end), and day 72 (1-month follow-up). We conducted survival analysis of time from quit date to dropout by race and ethnicity. Results The mean age of the analytic sample of 1288 users was 29.46 (SD 7.11) years. Of these, 65.81% (848/1288) were white, 16.04% (207/1288) were black, 8.86% (114/1288) were Latina, and 9.29% (120/1288) were multiracial, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander, or other; 82.68% (1065/1288) had some college education or less. Point-prevalence abstinence was 14.51% (157/1082) on quit day, 3.51% (38/1082) at intervention end, and 1.99% (21/1053) at 1-month follow-up. Black users (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91) and those with a high school degree or less (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.89) or some college education (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.99) were less likely to drop out than whites or users with a bachelor’s degree or higher. Response and abstinence rates were similar across race, ethnicity, and education. Conclusions Enrollment was low among racial and ethnic minority women but high among less-educated women. Abstinence at intervention end and 1-month follow-up was lower than that in controlled trials of text messaging cessation interventions for pregnant women (range 7%-20%). Increasing the reach, engagement, and effectiveness of SmokefreeMOM, especially among women with high rates of smoking during pregnancy, must be prioritized.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.7326/M15-2023

10.1097/AOG.0000000000002353

10.1093/aje/kwv301

MartinJAHamiltonBEOstermannMJKDriscollAKDrakePBirths: final data for 201720182019-05-10Hyattsville, MDNational Center for Health Statisticshttps://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_08-508.pdf

10.1089/jwh.2015.5244

U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesThe health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General20062019-05-10Atlanta, GAU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Healthhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44324/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK44324.pdf

10.1038/jp.2016.100

10.1007/s10995-018-2437-x

10.1136/jech.2009.107516

10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.194

10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864

10.1542/peds.2015-2388

10.1111/mcn.12622

10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03179.x

10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4

10.2196/mhealth.5436

10.2147/SAR.S84239

10.1186/1471-2458-13-472

U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Cancer InstituteSmokefree.gov2019https://smokefree.gov/

10.2196/jmir.8411

10.4172/2573-4571.1000116

10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.016

Bandura, A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory

10.1017/jsc.2016.24

10.1097/01.AOG.0000437385.88715.4a

10.1186/1471-2458-13-393

10.1186/2193-1801-2-222

10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722

Bennett, DA, 2001, Aust N Z J Public Health, 25, 464, 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x

10.1016/j.acap.2010.01.005

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUser guide to the 2017 natality public use file2017Atlanta, GACenters for Disease Control and Preventionftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/UserGuide2017.pdf

Ruppert, D, 2006, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. 2nd edition

DrakePDriscollAKMathewsTJCigarette smoking during pregnancy: United States, 201620182019-05-10Hyattsville, MDNational Center for Health Statisticshttps://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db305.pdf

text4baby2019New York, NYWellpasshttp://text4baby.org

10.2105/ajph.90.5.786

10.1111/add.13802

10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052945

10.1037/0893-164X.16.1.22

10.3109/00952990.2016.1149591

10.1093/ntr/ntq067

10.1093/ntr/nty073

10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.010

10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1

10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8

10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.003

10.1037/a0018327

10.2105/AJPH.2012.300736

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCoverage for tobacco use cessation treatments2014Atlanta, GANational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttps://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/quit_smoking/cessation/coverage/pdfs/coverage-508-1019.pdf

10.1093/ntr/ntw241

10.3390/ijerph13030282

10.1007/s12160-015-9706-3

10.1080/14622200410001669132

10.1056/NEJMsb1609216

10.1093/ntr/ntz178