Double Prosecution of Illicit Organ Removal as Organ Trafficking and Human Trafficking, with the Example of Belgium

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research - Tập 28 - Trang 503-524 - 2020
Sylwia Gawronska1, Laurens Claes2, Kristof Van Assche1
1Research Group Personal Rights & Property Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
2Research Group Law & Enforcement, Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Tóm tắt

In 2015 the Council of Europe introduced a new criminal law convention to address organ trafficking. The main focus of the Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs is the crime of illicit organ removal. The act of illicit organ removal is also criminalised under international human trafficking instruments that consider it as a form of exploitation of a living organ donor. As both legal frameworks rely on two key concepts to determine if the respective crimes occurred, namely, valid consent to organ removal and the presence of monetary benefits, a clear overlap exists when an organ is removed from a living donor. The question arises as to whether the illicit organ removal, based on the same factual circumstances and material evidence, is sufficiently distinct for an offender to be prosecuted under both regimes simultaneously or in separate criminal proceedings, without violating the principle of ne bis in idem. This paper aims to answer that question by (1) examining the crime of illicit organ removal under both criminal regimes and (2) analysing Belgian criminal law frameworks on human trafficking and organ trafficking in the context of the applicability of the principle of ne bis in idem as developed by the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. This analysis reveals the complexity of the issue. It also confirms the proximity of the legal definitions of both types of crimes, resulting in a considerable overlap and a clear risk of double prosecution and punishment. On the basis of these findings, recommendations are formulated on how to harmonise the application of both trafficking frameworks so as to minimise that risk.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allain, J. (2014). No effective trafficking definition exist: domestic implementation of the Palermo protocol. Albany Government Law Review, 7(1), 111–142. Ambagtsheer, F. (2017). Organ Trade. PhD, Erasmus University Rotterdam Anker, A. E., & Feeley, T. H. (2012). Estimating the risks of acquiring a kidney abroad: a meta-analysis of complications following participation in transplant tourism. Clinical Transplantation, 26(3), E232–E241. Audenaert, N. (2018). Het ne-bis-in-idembeginsel en eenheid van opzet: een goed huwelijk? [The Principle of Ne Bis in Idem and common intention: a happy marriage?]. Tijdschrift voor Strafrecht, 4, 262–280. Beernaert, M.-A., Bolsy, H. D. & Vandermeersch, D. (2017). Droit de la procédure pénale [Law of criminal procedure]. Brussels: die Keure. Budiani-Saberi, D., & Columb, S. (2013). A human rights approach to human trafficking for organ removal. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 16(4), 897–914. Budiani-Saberi, D., Raja, K., Findley, K. C., Kerketta, P., & Anand, V. (2014). Human trafficking for organ removal in India: a victim-centered, evidence-based report. Transplantation, 97(4), 380–384. Council of Europe/United Nations. (2009). Trafficking in organs, tissues and cells and trafficking in human beings for the purpose of organ removal. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. de Jong, J., & Ambagtsheer, F. (2016). Indicators to identify trafficking in human beings for the purpose of organ removal. Transplantation direct, 2(2), e56. De Wolf, D. (2017). De actuele betekenis van het “ne bis in idem”-beginsel’ [The current meaning of the principle “Ne Bis in Idem”]. In P. Traest, A. Verhage, & G. Vermeulen (Eds.), Strafrecht en strafprocesrecht: Doel of middel in een veranderde samenleving? [Criminal law and law of criminal procedure: end or means in a changing society?] (pp. 147–175). Mechelen: Kluwer. Declercq, R. (2014). Beginselen van strafrechtspleging [Principles of criminal procedure]. Mechelen: Kluwer. Deruyck, F. (2017). Overzicht van het Belgisch strafprocesrecht [Overview of the Belgian law of criminal procedure]. Bruges: die Keure. Deruyck, F. & De Nauw, A. (2017). Overzicht van het Belgisch algemeen strafrecht [Overview of Belgian general criminal law]. Bruges: die Keure. Gawronska, S. (2018). A critical look at the Council of Europe Convention against trafficking in human organs and what it means for the global fight against organ- and transplant-related crimes. European Criminal Law Review, 3, 404–439. Gawronska, S. (2019). Organ trafficking and human trafficking for the purpose of organ removal, two international legal frameworks against illicit organ removal. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 10(3), 268–286. Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. (2020). available at http://www.transplant-observatory.org. Goyal, M., Mehta, R. L., Schneiderman, L., & Sehgal, A. R. (2002). Economic and health consequences of selling a kidney in India. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(13), 1589–1593. Haken, K. (2011). Transnational crime in the Developing World (Center for International Policy). Hoet, P. (2004). Het ne bis in idem-beginsel in het grensoverschrijdend strafrechtsverkeer. Het gezag van gewijsde van Belgische en vreemde strafvonnissen [The principle of ne Bis in idem in cross-border criminal justice: the authority of binding force in Belgian and foreign criminal sentences]. Ghent: Larcier. Huberts, C. (2016). Un organe à quel prix ? Genèse et analyse de la Convention du Conseil de l’Europe contre le trafic d’organes humains [An organ at what price? Genesis and analysis of the Council of Europe Convention against trafficking in human organs]. Revue de droit pénal et de criminologie, 96(6), 605–652. Inston, N. G., Gill, D., Al-Hakim, A., & Ready, A. (2005). Living paid organ transplantation results in unacceptably high recipient morbidity and mortality. Transplant Proceedings, 37(2), 560–562. López-Fraga, M., Domínguez-Gil, B., Capron, A. M., Van Assche, K., Martin, D., Cozzi, E., & Delmonico, F. L. (2014). A needed convention against trafficking in human organs. The Lancet, 383(9936), 2187–2189. López-Fraga, M., Van Assche, K., Domínguez-Gil, B., Delmonico, F. L., & Capron, A. M. (2017). Human trafficking for the purpose of organ removal. In R. Piotrowicz, C. Rijken, & B. H. Uhl (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human trafficking (pp. 120–134). New York: Routledge. Martin, D. E., Van Assche, K., Domínguez-Gil, B., López-Fraga, M., Budiani-Saberi, D., Lavee, J., et al. (2016). Prevention of transnational transplant-related crimes: what more can be done? Transplantation, 100(8), 1776–1784. Martin, D. E., Van Assche, K., Domínguez-Gil, B., López-Fraga, M., Garcia-Gallont, R., Muller, E., & Capron, A. M. (2019). Strengthening global efforts to combat organ trafficking and transplant tourism: implications of the 2018 edition of the declaration of Istanbul. Transplantation direct, 5(3), e433. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). (2013). Trafficking in human beings for the purpose of organ removal in the OSCE region: analysis and findings, occasional paper series 6. Vienna: Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development. (2019a). Organ transplant tourism (Expert Memorandum prepared for Ms Stella Kyriakides by Professor Kristof Van Assche), AS/Soc/Inf (2018) 07, 5 February 2019, available at http://www.assembly.coe.int/LifeRay/SOC/Pdf/DocsAndDecs/2018/AS-SOC-INF-2018-07-EN.pdf. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2019b). Handbook for parliamentarians. The Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, available at https://edoc.coe.int/en/parliamentary-assembly/7992-handbook-for-parliamentarians-the-council-of-europe-convention-against-trafficking-in-human-organs-cets-no-216.html. Pascalev, A., de Jong, J., Ambagtsheer, F., et al. (2016). Trafficking in human beings for the purpose of organ removal: a comprehensive literature review. In F. Ambagtsheer & W. Weimar (Eds.), Trafficking in human beings for the purpose of organ removal: results and recommendations (pp. 15–68). Lengerich: Pabst. Shimazono, Y. (2007). The state of the international organ trade: a provisional picture based on integration of available information. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(12), 955–962. Tong, A., Chapman, J. R., Wong, G., Cross, N. B., Batabyal, P., & Craig, J. C. (2012). The experiences of commercial kidney donors: thematic synthesis of qualitative research. Transplant International, 25(11), 1138–1149. Trechsel, S. (2005). Human rights in criminal proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Issue paper on abuse of a position of vulnerability and other ‘means’ within the definition of trafficking in persons. New York: United Nations. Van den Wyngaert, C., Traest, P. & Vandromme, S. (2019). Strafrecht en strafprocesrecht in hoofdlijnen [Overview of criminal law and law of criminal procedure]. Antwerp: Maklu. Verstraeten, R. (2012). Handboek strafvordering [Manual on prosecution]. Antwerp: Maklu. Verstraeten, R. & Verbruggen, F. (2018). Strafrecht en strafprocesrecht voor bachelors [Criminal law and law of criminal procedure for bachelor students]. Antwerp: Intersentia.