Don’t let Yoda or Bill and Ted write your papers: instead, here’s some tips from some editors on getting your paper published

Worsham C, Woo J, Zimerman A, Bray CF, Jena AB (2022) An Empiral Assessment of Reviewer 2. INQUIRY: The journal of Health Care Organisation Provision and Financing 59:1–3 Trapp JV (2020) Citations equals research quality? If you agree then don’t cite this stupid, totally terrible article. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Caon M (2018) Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review”: why manuscripts are rejected. Australasian Phys Eng Sci Med 41(1):3–5 Ecarnot F, Seronde MF, Chopard R, Schiele F, Meneveau N (2015) Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Eur Geriatr Med 6(6):573–579 Iskander JK, Wolicki SB, Leeb RT, Siegel PZ (2018) Successful scientific writing and publishing: A step-by-step approach. Prev Chronic Dis 15(15):180085 Kamtchum-Tatuene J, Tchuisseu-Kwangoua LA, Moko-Tatuene NA, Bigna JJ, Noubiap JJ (2022) Write with the reviewers in mind: Why you got a rejection and how to avoid the next. Stroke 53:e273–e275 Richardson SM, Bella F, Mougel V, Milic J (2021) Scientific writing and publishing for early-career researchers from the perspective of young chemists. J Mater Chem A 9:18674–18680 Caon M (2015) What should not be in a manuscript submitted to a scientific journal. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 38(2):203–204 Sand-Jensen K (2007) How to write consistently boring scientific literature. Oikos 116:723–727 Faber J (2017) Writing scientific manuscripts: Most common mistakes. Dent Press J Orthod 22(5):113–117