Domains of Objects, Rituals of truth: Mapping Intersections between International Legal History and the New Materialisms

Aalberts, T., & Golder, B. (2012). On the Uses of Foucault for International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 25(03), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156512000295. Abramson, S. F., & Carter, D. B. (2016). The Historical Origins of Territorial Disputes. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000381. Ahmed, S. (1998). Differences That Matter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ahmed, S. (2008). Open Forum Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the `New Materialism’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807084854. Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. J. (Eds.). (2008). Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised ed.). London New York: Verso. Andía, R., & Javier, J. (Eds.). (2019). Non-Humans in Amerindian South America: Ethnographies of Indigenous Cosmologies, Rituals and Songs. New York: Berghahn. Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Arvidsson, M. (2018). Targeting, Gender, and International Posthumanitarian Law and Practice: Framing the Question of the Human in International Humanitarian Law. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 44(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2018.1465331. Aspremont, J. (2017). International Law as a Belief System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108375542. Author. (2020) Book Review: International Law’s Objects. Melbourne Journal of International Law 21(1) (2020). Author. (2021a) Normalising Global Commerce: Containerisation, Materiality, and Transnational Regulation. London Review of International Law 8, (Forthcoming). Author. (2021b) Beyond Texts? Towards a Material Turn in the Theory and History of International. Journal of the History of International Law (Forthcoming). Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321. Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. Beckert, S. (2015). Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Vintage. Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades Project. Edited by Rolf Tiedemann. Translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. Benjamin, W. (2003). On the Concept of History. In M. Jennings & H. Eiland (Eds.), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, 4: 1938–1940 (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bennett, J. (2010a). A Vitalist Stopover on the Way to a New Materialism. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New Materialisms Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press. Bennett, J. (2010b). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press. Bennett, J. (2012). Systems and Things: A Response to Graham Harman and Timothy Morton. New Literary History, 43(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2012.0020. Bennett, T., & Joyce, P. (Eds.). (2010). Material Powers: Cultural Studies. History and the Material Turn. London: Routledge. Bianchi, E. (2019). Matter. In R. T. Goodman (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of 21st-Century Feminist Theory (pp. 383–398). New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Biltoft, C. N. (2019). Against Scholarly Enclosures: Reconsidering the Art and Economics of Review. Capitalism A Journal of History and Economics, 1(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2019.0000. Black, C. F. (2011). The Land Is the Source of the Law: A Dialogic Encounter with Indigenous Jurisprudence. London: Routledge. Black, C. F. (2017). A Mosaic of Indigenous Legal Thought: Legendary Tales and Other Writings. New York: Routledge. Blanco, E., & Grear, A. (2019). Personhood, Jurisdiction and Injustice: Law, Colonialities and the Global Order. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 10(1), 86–117. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2019.01.05. Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bryant, L. (2011). The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. Buchely, L. (2012). Bureacracy, Distribution and Social Change: A Critique of Colombian Statelessness. Vniversitas, 125, 121–148. Burkett, P. (2013). Lukács on Science: A New Act in the Tragedy. Historical Materialism, 21(3), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341313. Butler, J. (2011). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge. Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x. Castro, D., & Viveiros, E. (2014). Perspectivisme et Multinaturalisme En Amérique Indigène. Journal Des Anthropologues, 138–139, 161–181. https://doi.org/10.4000/jda.4512. Chakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Charlesworth, H., & Larking, E. (2002). International Law: A Discipline of Crisis. The Modern Law Review, 65(3), 377–392. Charlesworth, H., & Larking, E. (Eds.). (2015). Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chiam, M., Eslava, L., Painter, G. R., Parfitt, R. S., & Peevers, C. (2017). History, Anthropology and the Archive of International Law. London Review of International Law, 5(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrx002. Choat, S. (2018). Science, Agency and Ontology: A Historical-Materialist Response to New Materialism. Political Studies, 66(4), 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717731926. Chow, R. (2010). The Elusive Material, What the Dog Doesn’t Understand. In N. Materialisms (Ed.), Diana Coole and Samantha Frost (pp. 221–233). Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996-010. Cloatre, E., & Cowan, D. (2018). Legalities and Materialities. In A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory (pp. 433–452). London: Routledge. Cole, S. A., & Bertenthal, A. (2017). Science, Technology, Society, and Law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113550. Conty, A. F. (2018). The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(7–8), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418802891. Coole, D. H., & Frost, S. (Eds.) (2010) Introducing the New Materialisms. In New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (1–43). Durham: Duke University Press. Coole, D. H., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010b). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press. Craven, M. (2019). Other Spaces: Constructing the Legal Architecture of a Cold War Commons and the Scientific-Technical Imaginary of Outer Space. European Journal of International Law, 30(2), 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz024. Crockett, C. (2018). Derrida after the End of Writing: Political Theology and New Materialism. New York: Fordham University Press. Cusset, F. (2008). French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Davies, M. (2017). Law Unlimited: Materialism, Pluralism, and Legal Theory. New York: Routledge. Dudley, S. H. (Ed.). (2010). Museum Materialities: Objects, Engagements. Interpretations. London: Routledge. Elden, S. (2013). The Birth of Territory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Elden, S. (2017). Legal Terrain—the Political Materiality of Territory. London Review of International Law, 5(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrx008. Ellenzweig, S. (2017). Who’s Afraid of Inertia? The Cartesian-Newtonian Legacy Reconsidered. In S. Ellenzweig & J. Zammito (Eds.), The New Politics of Materialism: History, Philosphy, Science (pp. 19–43). New York: Routledge. Fakhri, M. (2014). Sugar and the Making of International Trade Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139629089. Fakhri, M. (2018). Sugar. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 478–490). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Faulkner, A., Lange, B., & Lawless, C. (2012). Introduction: Material Worlds: Intersections of Law, Science, Technology, and Society. Journal of Law and Society, 39(1), 1–19. Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C., & Smith-Doerr, L. (Eds.). (2017). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (4th ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Fischer, M. M. J. (2014). The Lightness of Existence and the Origami of ‘French’ Anthropology. HAU Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 331–355. Fitzmaurice, A. (2018). Context in the History of International Law. Journal of the History of International Law, 20(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718050-20110032. Fontanelli, F., & Bianco, G. (2018). Barcelona Traction Share. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 141–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forrester, J. (1994). Mille e Tre Feud and Collecting. In J. Elsner & R. Cardinal (Eds.), The Cultures of Collecting (pp. 224–251). London: Reaktion Books. Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Translated by Graham Burchell. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Friedman, J. (1974). Marxism, Structuralism and Vulgar Materialism. Man, 9(3), 444–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/2800695. García-Salmones, M. (2015). Faith, Ritual and Rebellion in 21st Century (Positivist) International Law. European Journal of International Law, 26(2), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv030. Gay, P. (1989). Freud: A Life for Our Time. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Gordon, G. (2018). Railway Clocks. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 387–398). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grear, A. (2015). Deconstructing Anthropos: A Critical Legal Reflection on ‘Anthropocentric’ Law and Anthropocene ‘Humanity’. Law and Critique, 26(3), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9161-0. Grear, A. (2018). Human Rights and New Horizons? Thoughts toward a New Juridical Ontology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 43(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917736140. Grear, A. (2020). Embracing Vulnerability: Notes towards Human Rights for a More-than-Human World. In D. Bedford & J. Herring (Eds.), Embracing Vulnerability: The Challenges and Implications for Law (pp. 153–174). New York: Routledge. Guardiola-Rivera, O. (2007). Return of the Fetish: A Plea for a New Materialism. Law and Critique, 18(3), 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-007-9016-4. Haraway, D. (1992a). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. London: Verso. Haraway, D. (1992b). The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 295–337). New York: Routledge. Harman, G. (2002). Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphyics of Objects. Chicago: Open Court. Haskell, J., & Rasulov, A. (2018). International Law and the Turn to Political Economy. Leiden Journal of International Law, 31(2), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000092. Haskell, J. D., & Rasulov, A. (2020). New Voices and New Perspectives in International Economic Law. Berlin: Springer. Heidegger, M. (1967). What Is a Thing?. Chicago: Gateway. Hein, S. F. (2016). The New Materialism in Qualitative Inquiry: How Compatible Are the Philosophies of Barad and Deleuze? Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616634732. Hekman, S. J. (2010). The Material of Knowledge: Feminist Disclosures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Hinton, P., Mehrabi, T., & Barla, J. (2015). New Materialisms/New Colonialisms. https://newmaterialism.eu. Hohmann, J. (2016). Opium as an Object of International Law: Doctrines of Sovereignty and Intervention. In Reinisch, A., Footer, M., Binder, C. (Eds.) International Law and Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law. Oxford: Hart. Hohmann, J. (2017). The Treaty 8 Typewriter: Tracing the Roles of Material Things in Imagining, Realising, and Resisting Colonial Worlds. London Review of International Law, 5(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lry001. Hohmann, J. (2018). Opium. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 319–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hohmann, J., & Joyce, D. (2019). Material Pasts and Futures: International Law’s Objects. London Review of International Law, 7(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrz009. Honig, B. (2017). Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair. New York: Fordham University Press. Humphreys, S. (2018). Data: The Given. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 191–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hyde, T. (2019). Boundaries, Walls, Envelopes, Rooms, and Other Spatialities of Law. In S. Stern, M. Del Mar, & B. Meyler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities (pp. 235–254). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004) Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society. In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order (pp. 13–45). London: Routledge. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.) (2015). Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. In Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power (pp. 1–33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Jasanoff, S. (2016). Subjects of Reason: Goods, Markets and Competing Imaginaries of Global Governance. London Review of International Law, 4(3), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrw021. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. Johns, F. (2018). Things to Make and Do. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 47–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johnson, T. (2018). Legal History and The Material Turn. In M. D. Dubber & C. Tomlins (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal History (pp. 497–514). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.27. Joyce, D. (2018). International Law’s Cabinet of Curiosities. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 15–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Joyce, R. (2019). International Law and the Cold War: Reflections on the Concept of History. In M. Craven, S. Pahuja, & G. Simpson (Eds.), International Law and the Cold War (pp. 27–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kalpouzos, I. (2018). Armed Drones. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 118–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kang, H. Y. (2018). Law’s Materiality. In A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory (pp. 453–474). London: Routledge. Kang, H. Y., & Kendall, S. (2019a). Introduction. Law Text Culture, 23, 1–15. Kang, H. Y., & Kendall, S. (2019b). Legal Materiality. In S. Stern, M. D. Mar, & B. Meyler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities (pp. 21–38). New York: Oxford University Press. Kingsbury, B. (2019). Infrastructure and InfraReg: On Rousing the International Law ‘Wizards of Is’. Cambridge International Law Journal, 8(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.4337/cilj.2019.02.01. Knauß, S. (2018). Conceptualizing Human Stewardship in the Anthropocene: The Rights of Nature in Ecuador, New Zealand and India. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(6), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9731-x. Koskenniemi, M. (2019). Imagining the Rule of Law: Rereading the Grotian ‘Tradition’. European Journal of International Law, 30(1), 17–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz017. Landa, D. (1997). Manuel. A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History. New York: Zone Books. Lang, A. (2018). Purse Seine Net. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 377–386). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lang, A., & Marks, S. (2013). People with Projects: Writing the Lives of International Lawyers. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 27(2), 437–453. Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522. Larkin, B. (2018). Promising Forms: The Political Aesthetics of Infrastructure. In N. Anand, A. Gupta, & H. Appel (Eds.), The Promise of Infrastructure (pp. 175–202). Durham: Duke University Press. Latour, B. (1983). Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science (pp. 141–170). London: Sage Publications. Latour, B. (1984). Les microbes: guerre et paix. Collection Pandore. Paris: Métailié. Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Latour, B. (2007a). Can We Get Our Materialism Back, Please? Isis, 98, 138–142. Latour, B. (2007b). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Latour, B. (2009a). Perspectivism: ‘Type’ or ‘Bomb’? Anthropology Today, 25(2), 1–2. Latour, B. (2009b). From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public. In F. Candlin & R. Guins (Eds.), The Object Reader (pp. 153–164). London: Routledge. Latour, B. (2010). The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Translated by Marina Brilman and Alain Pottage. Cambridge: Polity. Law, J. (1984). On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 234–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00114.x. LeCain, T. J. (2017). The Matter of History: How Things Create the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lemke, T. (2016). Rethinking Biopolitics: The New Materialism and the Political Economy of Life. In S. E. Wilmer & A. Žukauskaitė (Eds.), Resisting Biopolitics: Philosophical, Political, and Performative Strategies (pp. 57–73). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764955. Lettow, S. (2017). Turning the Turn: New Materialism, Historical Materialism and Critical Theory. Thesis Eleven, 140(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616683853. Lundborg, T., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015). New Materialisms, Discourse Analysis, and International Relations: A Radical Intertextual Approach. Review of International Studies, 41(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000163. MacGregor, N. (2012). A History of the World in 100 Objects. London: Penguin Books. MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without Representation? Language and Materiality in Post-Qualitative Methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755. Mallard, G. (2017). Rules and Monitoring Systems—Complementary or Conflicting Logics?: A Response to Fleur Johns. AJIL Unbound, 111, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2017.49. Mallard, G. (2019). Gift Exchange: The Transnational History of a Political Idea., Cambridge Studies in Law and Society Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McGee, K. (Ed). (2015). Latour and the Passage of Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. McMillan, M. (2014). Koowarta and the Rival Indigenous International: Our Place as Indigenous Peoples in the International. Griffith Law Review, 23(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2014.944010. Mintz, S. W. (1986). Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Penguin Books. Moir, C. (2020). Ernst Bloch’s Speculative Materialism: Ontology, Epistemology, Politics. Leiden: Brill. Monforte, J. (2018). What Is New in New Materialism for a Newcomer? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2018.1428678. Mulcahy, L. (2017). Eyes of the Law: A Visual Turn in Socio-Legal Studies? Journal of Law and Society, 44, S111–S128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12052. Nicholson, M. (2017). Psychoanalyzing International Law(Yers). German Law Journal, 18(3), 451–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022033. Ogle, V. (2019). Time, Temporality and the History of Capitalism. Past & Present, 243(1), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz014. Orford, A. (2007). Ritual, Mediation and the International Laws of the South. Griffith Law Review, 16(2), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2007.10854595. Parfitt, R. (2014). The Spectre of Sources. European Journal of International Law, 25(1), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chu011. Parfitt, R. (2019). The Process of International Legal Reproduction: Inequality, Historiography. Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108655118. Parker, James E. K. (2015). Acoustic Jurisprudence: Listening to the Trial of Simon Bikindi. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Perry-Kesaris, A. (2017). The Pop-Up Museum of Legal Objects Project: An Experiment in ‘Socio-Legal Design’. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68(3), 225–244. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (Ed.). (2018a). Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory. London: Routledge. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2018b). Introduction: The and of Law and Theory. In A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge. Pottage, A. (2012). The Materiality of What? Journal of Law and Society, 39(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00576.x. Rawson, A., & Mansfield, B. (2018). Producing Juridical Knowledge: ‘Rights of Nature’ or the Naturalization of Rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618763807. Robbins, B. (2005). Commodity Histories. PMLA, 120(2), 454–463. Roele, I. (2018). The Making of International Lawyers: Winicott’s Transitional Objects. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 72–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rose, N., & Valverde, M. (1998). Governed By Law? Social and Legal Studies, 7(4), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399800700405. Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The New Materialisms and Indigenous Theories of Non-Human Agency: Making the Case for Respectful Anti-Colonial Engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26, 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135. Roy, D., & Subramaniam, B. (2016). Matter in the Shadows. In V. Pitts-Taylor (Ed.), Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Materialism (pp. 23–42). New York: NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833498.003.0002. Salter, M. B. (Ed.). (2015). Making Things International 1: Circuits and Motion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Salter, M. B. (Ed.). (2016). Making Things International. 2: Catalysts and Reactions. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Sartori, A. (2008). Bengal in Global Concept History: Culturalism in the Age of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Singh, P., & Mayer, B. (Eds.). (2014). Critical International Law: Postrealism, Postcolonialism, and Transnationalism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Smith, K. (2018). Amidst Things: New Histories of Commodities, Capital, and Consumption. The Historical Journal, 61(3), 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X17000516. The IGLP Law and Global Production Working Group. (2016). The Role of Law in Global Value Chains: A Research Manifesto. London Review of International Law, 4(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrw003. Tomlins, C. (2007). How Autonomous Is Law? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112741. Tomlins, C. (2012a). After Critical Legal History: Scope, Scale, Structure. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 31–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173811. Tomlins, C. (2012b). What Is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm after Critique? Revisiting Gordon’s ‘Critical Legal Histories’. Law & Social Inquiry, 37(1), 155–166. Tomlins, C. (2016). Historicism and Materiality in Legal Theory. In M. Del Mar & M. Lobban (Eds.), Law in Theory and History: New Essays on a Neglected Dialogue (pp. 57–83). Oxford: Hart Publishing. Tomlins, C. (2018a). Marxist Legal History. In M. D. Dubber & C. Tomlins (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal History (pp. 515–540). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tomlins, C. (2018b). Why Law’s Objects Do Not Disappear: On History as Remainder. In A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory (pp. 365–386). London: Routledge. Tomlins, C. (2019). Materialism and Legal Historiography, from Bachelard to Benjamin. In S. Stern, M. Del Mar, & B. Meyler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities (pp. 3–20). New York: Oxford University Press. Trentmann, F. (2017). Empire of Things: How We Became a World of Consumers, from the Fifteenth Century to the Twenty-First. Penguin History. London: Penguin Books. Trentmann, F. (2009). Materiality in the Future of History: Things, Practices, and Politics. Journal of British Studies, 48(2), 283–307. van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (2010). The Transversality of New Materialism. Women A Cultural Review, 21(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2010.488377. van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (2012). New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. Vatanparast, R. (2020). The Infrastructures of the Global Data Economy: Undersea Cables and International Law. Harvard International Law Journal Frontiers, 61, 1–9. Vismann, C. (2008). Files: Law and Media Technology. Translated by Geoffrey Winthrop-Young. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Vištica, O., & Grubišić, D. (2017). The Museum of Broken Relationships. New York: Grand Central Publishing. Viveiros de Castro, E. (1992). From the Enemy’s Point of View: Humanity and Divinity in an Amazonian Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Werner, W. (2018). Framing Objects of International Law. In J. Hohmann & D. Joyce (Eds.), International Law’s Objects (pp. 57–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Winner, L. (2020). The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Winnicott, D. W. (2016) Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena. In The Collected Works of D. W. Winnicott: Volume 3, 447–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780190271350.003.0088. Wolfe, C. (2017). Varieties of Vital Materialism. In S. Ellenzweig & J. Zammito (Eds.), The New Politics of Materialism: History, Philosphy, Science (pp. 44–65). New York: Routledge. Wood, E. M. (2017). The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View. New York: Verso. Zammito, J., & Ellenzweig, S. (2017). New Materialism: Looking Foward, Looking Back. In S. Ellenzweig & J. Zammito (Eds.), The New Politics of Materialism: History, Philosphy, Science (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge. Žižek, S. (2015). Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.