Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Belke, E., & Meyer, A. S. (2007). Single and multiple object naming in healthy ageing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 1178–1211.
Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 667–692.
Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2000). Writing words from pictures: What representations are activated, and when? Memory & Cognition, 28, 677–689. doi: 10.3758/BF03201257
Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208.
Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119, 417–430.
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
Crowther, J. E., & Martin, R. C. (2014). Lexical selection in the semantically blocked cyclic naming task: the role of cognitive control and learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00009
Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 416–431. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.416
Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 685–712.
Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, B77–B86.
Dell, G. S., Nozari, N., & Oppenheim, G. M. (2014). Word production: Behavioral and computational considerations. In M. A. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 88–104). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Goldrick, M., Folk, J. R., & Rapp, B. C. (2010). Mrs. Malaprop’s neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 113–134.
Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100, 464–482.
Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463–492.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. disc. 38–75.
Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 69–89. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90011-8
Mulatti, C., Peressotti, F., Job, R., Saunders, S., & Coltheart, M. (2012). Reading aloud: The cumulative lexical interference effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 662–667. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0269-z
Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., Peressotti, F., & Mahon, B. Z. (2014). Lexical retrieval is not by competition: Evidence from the blocked naming paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 253–272.
O’Séaghdha, P. G., & Frazer, A. K. (2014). The exception does not rule: Attention constrains form preparation in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 797–810.
O’Séaghdha, P. G., & Marin, J. W. (2000). Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: Sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 57–73. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.57
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–252.
Rapp, B., & Fischer-Baum, S. (2014). Representation of orthographic knowledge. In M. A. Goldrick, V. Ferreria, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 338–357). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 173–200.
Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 33–58.
Schnur, T. T. (2014). The persistence of cumulative semantic interference during naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 27–44.
Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 199–227.
Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Hirshorn, E., Coslett, H. B., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Localizing interference during naming: convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca’s area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 322–327.
Sevald, C., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91–127.
Shen, X. R., Damian, M. F., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2013). Abstract graphemic representations support preparation of handwritten responses. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 69–84.