Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time

Journal of Informetrics - Tập 9 Số 3 - Trang 419-429 - 2015
Lutz Bornmann1, Loet Leydesdorff2
1Division for Science and Innovation Studies, Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society, Hofgartenstr. 8, 80539, Munich, Germany
2Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15793, 1001 NG Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Acock, 2014

Allison, 1980, Inequality and scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 10, 163, 10.1177/030631278001000203

Bensman, 2007, Garfield and the impact factor, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93, 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410110

Berry, 1985

Bornmann, 2011, Scientific peer review, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45, 199, 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112

Bornmann, 2014, Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 935, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.007

Bornmann, 2015, Inter-rater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 10.1002/asi.23334

Bornmann, 2010, Do scientific advancements lean on the shoulders of giants? A bibliometric investigation of the Ortega hypothesis, PLoS ONE, 5, e11344, 10.1371/journal.pone.0011344

Bornmann, 2014, How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 175, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.005

Bornmann, 2015, Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?, Journal of Informetrics, 9, 408, 10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.006

Bornmann, 2013, How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 562, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.02.005

Chen, 2013, Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Colliander, 2014, A novel approach to citation normalization: A similarity-based method for creating reference sets, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Council of Canadian Academies, 2012

Cozzens, 1989, What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model, Scientometrics, 15, 437, 10.1007/BF02017064

Cragg, 1970, The demand for automobiles, Canadian Journal of Economics, 3, 386, 10.2307/133656

de Solla Price, 1970, Citation measures of hard sciences, soft science, technology and non-science, 3

Didegah, 2013, Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1055, 10.1002/asi.22806

Du, 2015

F1000, 2012

Gilbert, 1977, Referencing as persuasion, Social Studies of Science, 7, 113, 10.1177/030631277700700112

Hausman, 1984, Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents R and D relationship, Econometrica, 52, 909, 10.2307/1911191

Hilbe, 2007

Hilbe, 2014

Kaplan, 1965, The norms of citation behavior – Prolegomena to the footnote, American Documentation, 16, 179, 10.1002/asi.5090160305

Kline, 2004

Kreiman, 2011, Nine criteria for a measure of scientific output, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 5, 10.3389/fncom.2011.00048

Leydesdorff, 1990, Dimensions of citation analysis, Science Technology & Human Values, 15, 305, 10.1177/016224399001500303

Long, 2014

Luukkonen, 1997, Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis, Scientometrics, 38, 27, 10.1007/BF02461121

Macilwain, 2013, Halt the avalanche of performance metrics, Nature, 500, 255, 10.1038/500255a

Martin, 1983, Assessing basic research – Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy, Research Policy, 12, 61, 10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7

Marx, 2015, On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science, Scientometrics, 102, 1823, 10.1007/s11192-014-1499-9

Merton, 1965

Merton, 1988, The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property, ISIS, 79, 606, 10.1086/354848

Narin, 1991, Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers, Scientometrics, 21, 313, 10.1007/BF02093973

Onodera, 2014, Factors affecting citation rates of research articles, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research, Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research, Development Organizations, Laboratory Assessments Board, Division on Engineering, Physical Sciences, & National Research Council, 2012

Randić, 2009, Citations versus limitations of citations: Beyond Hirsch index, Scientometrics, 80, 809, 10.1007/s11192-008-2128-2

Small, 2004, On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation, Scientometrics, 60, 71, 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027310.68393.bc

Thelwall, 2014, Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 963, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.011

Waltman, 2014, F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: A comparison with citations, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 433, 10.1002/asi.23040

Waltman, 2011, Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations, Journal of Informetrics, 5, 37, 10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001

Wets, 2003, Post-publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000, Learned Publishing, 16, 249, 10.1087/095315103322421982

Wouters, 2012

Yu, 2014, Citation impact prediction for scientific papers using stepwise regression analysis, Scientometrics, 101, 1233, 10.1007/s11192-014-1279-6