Does knowledge management produce practical outcomes?

Journal of Knowledge Management - Tập 18 Số 2 - Trang 221-254 - 2014
Peter Massingham1, Rada Massingham2
1School of Management, Operations and Marketing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
2School of Accounting, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia

Tóm tắt

Purpose–The paper examines ways that Knowledge Management (KM) can demonstrate practical value for organizations. It begins by reviewing the claims made about KM, i.e. the benefits KM can provide to organizations. These claims are compared with traditional firm performance metrics to derive a criterion to measure the value of KM. Seven practical outcomes of KM are then presented as methods to persuade managers to invest in KM. These practical outcomes are then evaluated against the value criterion. The paper is based on empirical evidence from a five year longitudinal study.Design/methodology/approach–This paper is based on a longitudinal change project for a large Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Project grant in the period 2008-2013. The Project was a transformational change program which aimed to help make the partner organisation a learning organisation. The partner organisation was a large Australian Government Department, which faced the threat of knowledge loss caused by its ageing workforce. The sample was 118 respondents, mainly engineering and technical workers. A total of 150 respondents were invited to participate in the study which involved an annual survey and attendance at regular training workshops and related activities, with a participation rate of 79 per cent.Findings–This paper provides a checklist from which to evaluate KM in terms of financial and non-financial measures and seven practical outcomes from which to identify the organisational problem which may be addressed by KM. Lead and lag indicators – what needs to be done and what will result – are also provided. Managers may use this framework to identify the value proposition in any KM investment.Research limitations/implications–The research is based on a single case study in a public sector organization. While the longitudinal nature of the study and the rich data collected offsets this issue, it also presents good opportunities for researchers and practitioners to test the ideas presented in this paper in other industry contexts. The seven practical outcomes also vary in the maturity of the empirical evidence supporting KM ' s impact. Strategic alignment, value management, and psychological contract, in particular, are still under-developed and could be areas for specific further research testing the ideas presented here.Practical implications–This paper argues that investment decisions regarding KM may benefit from focusing on significant and on-going organisational problems, which will connect KM with firm performance and demonstrate financial and non-financial impact. The seven practical outcomes were evaluated against measurement criteria and against KM ' s claims. Overall, common themes were time and cost, as well as capability growth and performance improvements. Financial impact was mainly found in cost savings. Non-financial impact was found across the seven practical outcomes. It provides management with a checklist to make investment decisions regarding KM.Originality/value–The decision whether to invest in KM begins with methods used to evaluate any organisational project. Managers must determine first whether necessary funds are available; and then whether the project is worthwhile. The standard method for evaluating a project ' s worth is return on investment (ROI). However, calculating ROI for KM investment is problematic. Unless KM can be proven to directly improve performance in financial terms, managers may struggle to see its ROI. The paper begins by reviewing the claims made about KM, i.e. the benefits KM can provide to organizations. These claims are compared with traditional firm performance metrics to derive a criterion to measure the value of KM.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, J. (1995), Risk , UCL Press, London.

AMR Research (2008), “AMR Research”, available at: www.cioinsight.com/c/a/Case-Studies/5-Big-Companies-That-Got-Knowledge-Management-Right/.

Babcock, P. (2004), “Shedding light on knowledge management”, HR Magazine , Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 46-50.

Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life , Wiley, New York, NY.

Boisot, M. (2002), “The creation and sharing of knowledge”, in Choo, C.W. and Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge , Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 65-78.

Boston Consulting Group (1972), Perspectives on Experience , BCG, Boston, MA.

Boudreau, J. (2003), “Strategic knowledge measurement and management”, in Jackson, S.E. , Hitt, M.A. and Denisi, A.S. (Eds), Effective Human Resource Management , Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 360-398.

Burr, R. and Thomson, P. (2002), “Expanding the network: what about including the ‘all’ in the psychological contract?”, paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO.

Chapman, C.S. (2005), “Controlling strategy”, in Chapman, C. (Ed.), Controlling strategy: Management Accounting and Performance , Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Coopey, J. (1995), “Managerial culture and the stillbirth of organizational commitment”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 56-76.

Coulson-Thomas, C.J. (1996), “BPR and the learning organisation”, The Learning Organization , Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 16-21.

Day, G.S. and Montgomery, D.B. (1983), “Diagnosing the experience curve”, The Journal of Marketing , Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 44-58.

Deegan, C. (2009), Financial Accounting Theory , 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, North Ryde.

DeNisi, A.S. , Hitt, M.A. and Jackson, S.E. (2003), “The knowledge-based approach to sustainable competitive advantage”, in Jackson, S.E. , Hitt, M.A. and DeNisi, A.S. (Eds), Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management , Chapter 1, pp. 3-36, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

De Zoysa, S. and Russell, A.D. (2003), “Knowledge-based risk identification in infrastructure projects”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering , Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 511-522.

Drucker, P. (1999), “Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge”, California Management Review , Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 79-94.

Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (2003), “Chapter 1, watersheds of organizational learning and knowledge management”, in Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management , Blackwell Publishing, Hong Kong.

Eckerson, W.W. (2006), Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business , Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

Gold, A.H. , Malhotra, A. and Segars, A.H. (2001), “Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective”, Journal of Management Information Systems , Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 185-214.

Grant, R.M. (1996), “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 17, Winter, pp. 109-122, Special Issue.

Grant, R.M. (2013), Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases , 8th ed., Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA and Chichester.

Hackett, B. (2002), “Beyond knowledge management: new ways to work”, in Choo, C.W. and Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge , Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 725-738.

Hall, G. and Howell, S. (1985), “The experience curve from an economist ' s perspective”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 6, pp. 197-212.

Homans, G.C. (1961), Social Behaviorism , Harcourt Brace and World, New York, NY.

Huizing, A. and Bouman, W. (2002), “Knowledge and learning, markets and organizations”, in Choo, C.W. and Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge , Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 185-206.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2001), The Strategy-Focused Organisation , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2006), Alignment , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Langfield-Smith, K. , Thorne, H. and Hilton, R. (2012), Management Accounting: Information for Managing and Creating Value , 6th ed., McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead.

Li, G. and Rajagopalan, S. (1997), “A learning curve model with knowledge depreciation”, European Journal of Operational Research , Vol. 105 No. 1, pp. 143-154.

Lee, H. and Choi, B. (2003), “Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination”, Journal of Management Information Systems , Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 179-228.

Lipshitz, R. , Popper, M. and Friedman, V.J. (2002), “A multifacet model of organizational learning”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 78-98.

Looise, J.K. and Paauwe, J. (2001), “HR research in The Netherlands: imitation and innovation”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 12 No. 7, pp. 1203-1217.

McNabb, D.E. (2007), Knowledge Management in the Public Sector: A Blueprint for Innovation in Government , M.E. Sharpe, London.

March, J.G. and Shapira, Z. (1987), “Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking”, Management Science , Vol. 22 No. 11, pp. 1404-1418.

Martinus, K. (2010), “Planning for production efficiency in knowledge-based development”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 726-743.

Massingham, P. (2010), “Knowledge risk management: a framework”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 464-485.

Massingham, P. and Diment, K. (2009), “Organizational commitment, knowledge management interventions, and learning organization capacity”, The Learning Organization , Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 122-142.

Mills, A.M. and Smith, T.A. (2011), “Knowledge management and organizational performance: a decomposed view”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 156-171.

Mishra, S. (2007), “A brief history of production functions”, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract1/41020577.

Neely, A. (1998), Measuring Business Performance , The Economists Books, London.

Nieto, M. and Perez-Can, C. (2004), “The influence of knowledge attributes on innovation protection mechanisms”, Knowledge and Process Management , Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 117-126.

O ' Donohue, W. , Sheehan, C. , Hecker, R. and Holland, P. (2007), “The psychological contract of knowledge workers”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 73-82.

Paldam, M. and Svendsen, G.T. (2000), “An essay on social capital: looking for the fire behind the smoke”, European Journal of Political Economy , Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 339-366.

Paxton, L.J. (2006), “Managing innovative space missions: lessons from NASA”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 8-21.

Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , Free Press, New York, NY.

Powell, T.W. (2007), “Knowledge return on investment, chapter 9”, in Koenig, M.E.D. and Srikantaiah, T.K. (Eds), Knowledge Management Lessons Learned: What Works and What Doesn't , Information Today, Medford, NJ, pp. 125-140.

Rousseau, D.M. (1989), “Psychological and implied contracts in organizations”, Employee Responsibilities on Rights Journal , Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 121-139.

Rousseau, D.M. (1995), Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreement , Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Sabatini, F. (2006), “The empires of social capital and economic development: a critical perspective”, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Rome, available at: www.socialcapitalgateway.org/Sabatini%20(2006)%20-20The%20empirics%20of%20social%20capital%20and%20economic%20development%20-%20January%202006%20-%20Published%20FEEM%20-%20January%202006%20-%20Published%20FEEM.pdf.

Schenkel, A. and Teigland, R. (2008), “Improved organizational performance through communities of practice”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 106-118.

Senge, P.M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , Random House, London.

Senshu, K.I. and Souissi, M. (2012), “Managerial accounting as a tool for corporate strategy: synergy creation and energy inhibition”, Journal of International Business Research , Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 63-72.

Sharkie, R. (2005), “Precariousness under the new psychological contract: the effect on trust and the willingness to converse and share knowledge”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice , Vol. 3, pp. 37-44.

Storey, J. and Barnett, E. (2000), “Knowledge management initiatives: learning from failure”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 145-156.

Tiwana, A. (2001), The Essential Guide to Knowledge Management: E-Business and CRM Applications , Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Tovstiga, G. (1999), “Profiling the knowledge worker in the knowledge-intensive organization: emerging roles”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol. 18, pp. 731-744.

Treacy, M. and Wiersema, F. (1995), The Discipline of Market Leaders , Harper Collins, New York, NY.

Zack, M. , McKeen, J. and Singh, S. (2009), “Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 392-409.

Zyngier, S. (2006), “Knowledge management governance”, in Schwarz, D. (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Knowledge Management , Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 373-380.

Levy, M. (2011), “Knowledge retention: minimizing organizational business loss”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 582-600.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Knowledge Management

Tập 18 Số 2

221-254

Thông tin tác giả