Does it Matter How Small Geographic Areas are Constructed? Ward's Algorithm Versus the Plurality Rule
Tóm tắt
Objective: Illustrate Ward's clustering algorithm, an approach that creates small geographic areas based on similarity in the pattern of hospital use. Compare areas resulting from Ward's algorithm using all hospital discharges to 1) areas resulting from the plurality rule, the more widely used approach, and 2) areas resulting from Ward's algorithm using subsets of discharges.
Findings: Compared to areas from Ward's algorithm, the plurality rule resulted in many more single zip code areas and somewhat more large zip code areas. R2, a measure of within-area variation in the pattern of hospital use, did not differ much by clustering method. When areas from Ward's algorithm were paired with areas from the plurality rule, about 81% of the discharges from Ward's algorithm areas were in the paired plurality rule areas. Though in many cases there were large errors when zip code discharge rates were estimated by area rates, the distribution of errors was similar whether Ward's algorithm or the plurality rule was used to create the areas. When areas from different clustering methods were used in a study to identify those areas with large differences in utilization patterns by payor type, between 70% and 83% of zip codes and discharges were flagged in common.
Conclusions: Though for several summary measures there was little difference by clustering method, the actual areas created were different. There is no gold standard to determine which set of areas is best. However, Ward's clustering algorithm has conceptual appeal compared to the more widely used plurality rule.
Tài liệu tham khảo
B. A. Barnes, E. Z. O'Brien, C. Comstock, D. G. D'Arpa and C. L. Donahue. “Report on variation in rates of utilization of surgical services in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 254, pp. 371–375, 1985.
L. W. Briggs, J. E. Rohrer, R. L. Ludke, P. E. Hilsenrath and K. T. Philips. “Geographic variation in primary care visits in Iowa,” Health Services Research, 30, pp. 657–671, 1995.
D. M. Carlisle, R. B. Valdez, M. F. Shapiro and R. H. Brook. “Geographic variation in rates of selected surgical procedures within Los Angeles county,” Health Services Research, 30, pp. 27–42, 1995.
F. A. Connell, R. W. Day and J. P. LoGerfo. “Hospitalization of Medicaid children, Analysis of small area variations in admission rates,” American Journal of Public Health, 71, pp. 606–613, 1981.
A. M. Gittelsohn and N. R. Powe. “Small area variations in health care delivery in Maryland,” Health Services Research, 30, pp. 295–317, 1995.
J. R. Griffith, J. D. Restuccia, P. Tedeschi, P. Wilson and H. Zuckerman. “Measuring hospital community services in Michigan,” Health Services Research, 16, pp. 135–160, 1981.
L. Leape, R. E. Park, D. H. Solomon, M. R. Chassin, J. Kosecoff and R. H. Brook. “Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services?” Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, pp. 669–672, 1990.
C. E. Lewis. “Variations in the incidence of surgery,” New England Journal of Medicine, 281, pp. 880–884, 1969.
L. F. McMahon, R. A. Wolfe and P. J. Tedeschi. “Variation in hospital admissions among small areas, a comparison of Maine and Michigan,” Medical Care, pp. 623–631, 1989.
S. McPherson, J. E. Wennberg, O. B. Hovind and P. Clifford. “Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures, an international comparison of New England, England and Norway,” New England Journal of Medicine, 307, pp. 1310–1314, 1982.
P. Paul-Shaheen, J. D. Clark and D. Williams. “Small area analysis, a review and analysis of the North American literature,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 12, pp. 741–809, 1987.
J. Restuccia, M. Shwartz, A. Ash and S. Payne. “High hospital admission rates and inappropriate care,” Health Affairs, 15, pp. 156–163, 1996.
C. H. Romesburg. Cluster analysis for researchers. Wadsworth, London, 1984.
N. P. Roos and L. L. Roos Jr. “Surgical rate variations, Do they reflect the health or socioeconomic characteristics of the population,” Medical Care, 20, pp. 945–958, 1982.
N. P. Roos. “Hysterectomy, variations in rates across small areas and across physicians' practices,” American Journal of Public Health, 74, pp. 327–335, 1984.
M. Shwartz, A. S. Ash, J. Anderson, L. I. Iezzoni, S. M. C. Payne and J. D. Restuccia. “Small area variations in hospitalization rates, how much you see depends on how you look,” Medical Care, 32, pp. 189–201, 1994.
M. Shwartz, A. S. Ash, J. Anderson, J. D. Restuccia, S. M. C. Payne, G. S. Coffman and L. I. Iezzoni, “Inappropriateness and variations in hospital use, phase I,” final report submitted to the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (RO1-HS06048), 1991.
J. W. Thomas, J. R. Griffith and P. Durance. “Defining hospital clusters and associated service communities in metropolitan areas,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 15, 45–51, 1981.
J. E. Wennberg and A. Gittelsohn. “Health care delivery in Maine I, patterns of use of common surgical procedures,” Journal of the Maine Medical Association, 66, pp. 123–130, 1975.
J. E. Wennberg and A. Gittelsohn. “Variations in medical care among small areas,” Scientific American, 246, pp. 120–133, 1982.
J. E. Wennberg, B. A. Barnes and M. Zubkoff. “Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand,” Social Science in Medicine, 16, pp. 811–824, 1982.
J. Zwanziger, G. A. Melnick and J. M. Mann. “Measures of hospital market structure, a review of the alternatives and a proposed approach,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 24, 81–95, 1990.