Does feigning amnesia impair subsequent recall?
Tóm tắt
Defendants who are accused of serious crimes sometimes feign amnesia to evade criminal responsibility. Previous research has suggested that feigning amnesia might impair subsequent recall. In two experiments, participants read and heard a story about a central character, described as “you,” who was responsible for the death of either a puppy (Experiment 1) or a friend (Experiment 2). On free and cued recall tests immediately after the story, participants who had feigned amnesia recalled less than did participants who had recalled accurately. One week later, when all participants recalled accurately, participants who had previously feigned amnesia still performed worse than did participants who had recalled accurately both times. However, the participants who had formerly feigned amnesia did not perform worse than did a control group who had received only the delayed recall tests. Our results suggest that a “feigned amnesia effect” may reflect nothing more than differential practice at recall. Feigning amnesia for a crime need not impair memory for that crime when a person later seeks to remember accurately.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bernard, L. C., McGrath, M. J., & Houston, W. (1994). Discriminating between simulated malingering and closed head injury on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 539–551.
Bulevich, J. B., Roediger, H. L., III, Balota, D. A., & Butler, A. C. (2006). Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/ no-think paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1569–1577.
Bylin, S., & Christianson, S.-A. (2002). Characteristics of malingered amnesia: Consequences of withholding vs. distorting information on later memory of a crime event. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 7, 45–61.
Cercy, S. P., Schretlen, D. J., & Brandt, J. (1997). Simulated amnesia and the pseudo-memory phenomena. In R. Rogers(Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 85–107). New York: Guilford Press.
Christianson, S.-A., & Bylin, S. (1999). Does simulating amnesia mediate genuine forgetting for a crime event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 495–511.
Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218–224.
Jelicic, M., Merckelbach, H., & Van Bergen, S. (2004). Symptom validity testing of feigned amnesia for a mock crime. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 525–531.
Kopelman, M. D. (1995). The assessment of psychogenic amnesia. In A. D. Baddeley, B. A. Wilson, & F. N. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of memory disorders (pp. 427–448). New York: Wiley.
Mulligan, N. W. (2005). Total retrieval time and hypermnesia: Investigating the benefits of multiple recall tests. Psychological Research, 69, 272–284.
Polage, D. C. (2004). Fabrication deflation? The mixed effects of lying on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 455–465.
Pyszora, N. M., Barker, A. F., & Kopelman, M. D. (2003). Amnesia for criminal offences: A study of life sentence prisoners. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14, 475–490.
Rubinsky, E. W., & Brandt, J. (1986). Amnesia and criminal law: A clinical overview. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 4, 27–46.
Schacter, D. L. (1986). Amnesia and crime: How much do we really know? American Psychologist, 41, 286–295.
Van Oorsouw, K., & Merckelbach, H. (2004). Feigning amnesia undermines memory for a mock crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 505–518.
Van Oorsouw, K., & Merckelbach, H. (2006). Simulating amnesia and memories of a mock crime. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 261–271.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.
Wiggins, E. C., & Brandt, J. (1988). The detection of simulated amnesia. Law & Human Behavior, 12, 57–78.