Liệu tài chính kỹ thuật số có ảnh hưởng đến hiệu suất năng lượng tái tạo ở Trung Quốc?

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 30 - Trang 85708-85720 - 2023
Chong Wang1, Shubing Wang2
1School of Finance, Henan Institute of Economics and Trade, Zhengzhou, China
2School of Business, Henan Institute of Economics and Trade, Zhengzhou, China

Tóm tắt

Mục tiêu của nghiên cứu này là khảo sát cách thức tài chính kỹ thuật số ảnh hưởng đến hiệu suất năng lượng tái tạo tại Trung Quốc. Dữ liệu thực nghiệm từ Trung Quốc trong khoảng thời gian từ 2007 đến 2019 được sử dụng để đánh giá mối quan hệ giữa các biến số này. Nghiên cứu sử dụng hai kỹ thuật, hồi quy phân vị (QR) và phương pháp tổng quát các phương pháp của các khoảnh khắc (GMM), để rút ra các kết luận thực nghiệm. Kết quả cho thấy tài chính kỹ thuật số có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến hiệu suất năng lượng tái tạo, tăng trưởng sinh thái và hiệu suất tài chính của các thành phố ở Trung Quốc. Cụ thể, tài chính kỹ thuật số chiếm 45.92% sự biến động trong các chỉ số năng lượng tái tạo, 27.60% trong tăng trưởng sinh thái, và 24.39% trong sự cải thiện hiệu suất tài chính của năng lượng tái tạo ở cấp thành phố. Nghiên cứu cũng quan sát thấy rằng điểm số ở cấp thành phố cho tài chính kỹ thuật số, năng lượng tái tạo, và các chỉ số khác có sự không đồng nhất trong chuyển động. Các yếu tố góp phần vào sự không đồng nhất này bao gồm dân số cao (16.05%), khả năng tiếp cận ngân hàng kỹ thuật số (23.11%), hiệu suất năng lượng tái tạo cấp tỉnh (39.62%), sự ổn định tài chính hộ gia đình (22.04%), và khả năng nhận thức về năng lượng tái tạo của các hộ gia đình (8.47%). Dựa trên những phát hiện này, nghiên cứu đưa ra các khuyến nghị thực tiễn cho các bên liên quan chính.

Từ khóa

#tài chính kỹ thuật số #năng lượng tái tạo #hiệu suất #Trung Quốc #hồi quy phân vị #GMM #tăng trưởng sinh thái #hiệu suất tài chính

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmad B, Iqbal S, Hai M, Latif S (2022) The interplay of personal values, relational mobile usage and organizational citizenship behavior. Interact Technol Smart Educ 19(2):260–280 Alharbi SS, Al Mamun M, Boubaker S, Rizvi SKA (2023) Digital finance and renewable energy: a worldwide evidence. Energy Econ 118:106499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106499 Alsagr N (2023) Financial efficiency and its impact on renewable energy investment: empirical evidence from advanced and emerging economies. J Clean Prod 401:136738 Alsagr N, van Hemmen S (2021) The impact of financial development and geopolitical risk on renewable energy consumption: evidence from emerging markets. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:25906–25919 Amigo-Jorquera C, Guerrero-González MJ, Sannazzaro J, Urquiza-Gómez A (2019) Does energy poverty have a female face in Chile? Takuya: Latin American Science. Technol Soc 2(1):378–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2019.1608038 Bag S, Wood LC, Mangla SK, Luthra S (2020) Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy. Resour Conserv Recycl 152:104502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502 Bei J, Wang C (2023) Renewable energy resources and sustainable development goals: evidence based on digital finance, clean energy, and environmentally friendly investment. Resour Policy 80:103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103194 Bilal AR, Fatima T, Iqbal S, Imran MK (2022) I can see the opportunity that you cannot! A nexus between individual entrepreneurial orientation, alertness, and access to finance. Eur Bus Rev 34(4):556–577 Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD (2008) Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 59(5):830–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.20806 Bouzarovski S (2017) Energy poverty: (Dis)assembling Europe’s infrastructural divide. Energy Poverty: (Dis)Assembling Eur Infrastruct Divide:1–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69299-9 Calado H, Gutierrez D, Pegorelli C, Kirkfeldt TS, Hipólito C, Moniz F, McClintock W, Vergílio M, Guerreiro J, Papaioannou E (2021) A tailored method for strategic environmental assessment in maritime spatial planning. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 23(01n02):2250009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333222500090 Castaño-Rosa R, Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M (2020) Energy poverty goes south? Understanding the costs of energy poverty with the index of vulnerable homes in Spain. Energy Res Soc Sci 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2019.101325 Chang L, Iqbal S, Chen H (2023) Does financial inclusion index and energy performance index co-move?. Energy Policy 174:113422 Chen Y, Kumara EK, Sivakumar V (2021) Investigation of the finance industry on risk awareness model and digital economic growth. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04287-7 Filippi A, Tedeschi L, Parretti D, Ricci S, Morelli P, Grilli P, Rossi A, Innocenti F (2009) Lifestyle counseling in primary care: long-term effects on cholesterol level. Eur J Gen Pract 15(3):136–140. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814780903362560 Golosnoy AS, Provotorov VV, Sergeev SM, Raikhelgauz LB, Kravets OJ (2019) Software engineering math for network applications. J Phys: Conf Ser 1399(4):044047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1399/4/044047 Gouveia JP, Palma P, Simoes SG (2019) Energy poverty vulnerability index: a multidimensional tool to identify hotspots for local action. Energy Rep 5:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2018.12.004 Gross R, Leach M, Bauen A (2003) Progress in renewable energy. Environ Int 29(1):105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00130-7 Gu X, Alamri AM, Ahmad M, Alsagr N, Zhong X, Wu T (2023) Natural resources extraction and green finance: Dutch disease and COP27 targets for OECD countries. Resour Policy 81:103404 Guasch-Ferré M, Li Y, Bhupathiraju SN, Huang T, Drouin-Chartier JP, Manson JAE, Sun Q, Rimm EB, Rexrode KM, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB (2022) Healthy lifestyle score including sleep duration and cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Prev Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.01.027 Hanssen F, May R, van Dijk J, Rød JK (2018) Spatial multi-criteria decision analysis tool suite for consensus-based siting of renewable energy structures. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 20(03):1840003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333218400033 Iqbal S, Bilal AR, Nurunnabi M, Iqbal W, Alfakhri Y, Iqbal N (2021) It is time to control the worst: testing COVID-19 outbreak, energy consumption and CO 2 emission. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:19008–19020 Iqbal S, Bilal AR (2021) Energy financing in COVID-19: how public supports can benefit?. China Finance Rev Int 12(2):219–240 Kabir KH, Khan MA, Hasan K, Aftab S (2022) Driving forces of adaptation decision and strategies to climate-related events: case on farming households in south–west coastal Bangladesh. J Environ Assess Policy Manage:2250019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333222500193 Kabir Z (2022) The Role of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) in the development of a mine closure plan in regional Australia. J Environ Assess Policy Manage:2250015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333222500156 Li CZ, Umair M (2023) Do digital finance development goals affects renewable energy in China? Renew Energy 203(December 2022):898–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.066 Li W, Chien F, Ngo QT, Nguyen TD, Iqbal S, Bilal AR (2021) Vertical financial disparity, energy prices and emission reduction: empirical insights from Pakistan. J Environ Manage 294:112946 Lin B, Okyere MA (2023) Race and energy poverty: the moderating role of subsidies in South Africa. Energy Econ 117:106464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106464 Marttunen M, Mustajoki J (2018) Use of analyst-generated stakeholder preference profiles in multi-criteria decision analysis — experiences from an urban planning case. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 20(03):1840002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333218400021 Muhammad J, Fatima, & Sharif. (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:406–414 Nielsen M, Ravensbeck L, Nielsen R (2014) Green growth in fisheries. Marine Policy 46:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.003 Podvalny SL, Podvalny ES, Provotorov VV (2017) The controllability of parabolic systems with delay and distributed parameters on the graph. Proc Comput Sci 103:324–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.115 Pofoura AK, Sun H, Mensah IA, Liu F (2022) How does eco-innovation affect CO2 emissions? evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. J Environ Assess Policy Manage:2250017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433322250017X Shahzad U, Gupta M, Sharma GD, Rao A, Chopra R (2022) Resolving energy poverty for social change: research directions and agenda. Technol Forecast Soc Change 181:121777. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121777 Shaktawat A, Vadhera S (2022) Sustainability assessment of renewable energy performance in context to India using multicriteria analysis with and without incorporating risk analysis. J Environ Assess Policy Manage:2250020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433322250020X Shi Y, Tiwari AK, Gozgor G, Lu Z (2020) Correlations among cryptocurrencies: Evidence from multivariate factor stochastic volatility model. Res Int Business Finance 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101231 Sironen S, Mononen L (2018) Spatially referenced decision analysis of long-term forest management scenarios in Southwestern Finland. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 20(03):1850009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333218500096 Sun Y, Ding W, Yang Z, Yang G, Du J (2020) Measuring China’s regional inclusive green growth. Sci Total Environ 713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136367 Sun L, Fang S, Iqbal S, Bilal AR (2022) Financial stability role on climate risks, and climate change mitigation: implications for green economic recovery. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(22):33063–33074 Wang Y, Zhi Q (2016) The role of digital finance in environmental protection: two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Proc 104:311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053 Wang S, Sun L, Iqbal S (2022) Green financing role on renewable energy dependence and energy transition in E7 economies. Renew Energ 200:1561–1572 Wu L, Xu L (2020) The role of venture capital in SME loans in China. Res Int Business Finance 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101081 Yang Y, Liu Z, Saydaliev HB, Iqbal S (2022) The economic impact of crude oil supply disruption on social welfare losses and strategic petroleum reserves. Resour Policy 77:102689. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2022.102689 Yin X, Xu Z (2022) An empirical analysis of the coupling and coordinative development of China’s digital finance and economic growth. Resour Policy 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102476 Zhang L, Huang F, Lu L, Ni X, Iqbal S (2022) Energy financing for energy retrofit in COVID-19: recommendations for green bond financing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(16):23105:23116 Zheng X, Zhou Y, Iqbal S (2022) Working capital management of SMEs in COVID-19: role of managerial personality traits and overconfidence behavior. Econ Anal Policy 76:439–451 Zhou M, Li X (2022) Influence of digital finance and renewable energy resources over the sustainable development goal of clean energy in China. Resour Policy 78(May):102816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102816 Zhao L, Saydaliev HB, Iqbal S (2022) Energy financing, COVID-19 repercussions and climate change: implications for emerging economies. Clim Chang Econ 13(03):2240003