Does New Information Technology Lower Media Quality? The Paradox of Commercial Public Goods
Tóm tắt
We define commercial public goods as goods that are broadcast via television, radio, newsprint, or websites for which consumption is non-rival and non-exclusive, and revenue is generated mainly through advertising alongside a product in a two-sided market. With new information technology the fixed cost of entry in these markets has substantially declined. We demonstrate that as fixed costs of entry decline in a competitive media market, lower industry concentration results in lower resources to each firm for the production of commercial public goods. The counterintuitive result of new information technology is that it may result in lower quality news reporting and a less-informed population. The result may hold even when consumers exhibit preferences for diversity in media outlets.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson S, Coate S (2000) Market provision of public goods: a welfare analysis. Rev Econ Stud 72:947–972
Anderson S and Gabszewicz JJ (2005) “The media and advertising: a tale of two-sided markets,” CEPR Discussion Papers #5223
Frijters P, Velamuri M (2010) Is the internet bad news? The online news Era and the market for high- quality news. Rev Netw Econ 9(2):1–31
Kind HJ, Nilssen T and Sørgard L (2006) “Competition for viewers and advertisers in a TV oligopoly,” CESifo Working Paper
Pew Research Center (2012) “In: Changing news landscape, even television is vulnerable: trends in news consumption: 1991–2012” Released September 27, 2012. URL: http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/in-changing-news-landscape-even-television-is-vulnerable
Rochet C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029
Rosse J (1967) Daily newspapers, monopolistic competition, and economies of scale. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 57(2):522–533
Spence M, Owen B (1977) Television programming, monopolistic competition, and welfare. Q J Econ 91(1):103–126
Steiner P (1952) Program patterns and preferences and the workability of competition in radio broadcasting. Q J Econ 66:194–223