Does Leaving Home Make You Poor? Evidence from 13 European Countries

Aassve, A., Betti, G., Mazzuco, S., & Mencarini, L. (2007). Marital disruption and economic well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 170(3), 781–799.

Aassve, A., Davia, M. A., Iacovou, M., & Mencarini, L. (2005a). Poverty and transition to adulthood: Risky situations and risky events, ISER working paper 2005 – 23. Colchester: University of Essex, from http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/

Aassve, A., Iacovou, M., & Mencarini, L. (2006). Youth poverty and transition to adulthood in Europe. Demographic Research, 15, 21–50, from http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol15/2/

Aassve, A., Mazzucco, S., & Mencarini, L. (2005b). Childbearing and wellbeing: A comparative analysis of the European welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 5(4), 283–299.

Becker, S., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The STATA Journal, 2(4), 358–377.

Berthoud, R., & Robson, K. (2003). Early motherhood and disadvantage: A comparison between ethnic groups. ISER working paper no. 2003-29. Colchester: University of Essex, from http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/

Billari, F. C., Rosina, A., Ranaldi, R., & Romano, M. C. (2007). Young adults living apart and together (LAT) with parents: A three level analysis of the Italian case. Regional Studies (forthcoming).

Bradbury, B., & Jantti, M. (1999). Child poverty across industrialized nations, Innocenti occasional papers economic and social policy series no. 71, September 1999. UNICEF, Florence.

Breen, R., & Buchmann, M. (2002). Institutional variation and the position of young people: A comparative perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Sciences, 580(1), 288–305. March 2002.

Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2005). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA working paper, number 1588, from http://repec.iza.org/dp1588.pdf

Cantillon B., & van den Bosch, K. (2003). Social policy strategies to combat income poverty of children and families in Europe. In: Krause P. (Eds.), Combating poverty in Europe: The German welfare regime in practice (pp. 317–329). e.a., Aldershot, Ashgate.

Cantó-Sánchez, O., & Mercader-Prats, M. (1999). Poverty among children and youth in Spain: The role of parents and youth employment status. Document de Treball 99.07, Departament d’Economia Aplicada, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Cantó-Sanchéz, O., & Mercader-Prats, M. (2001). Young people leaving home: The impact of poverty in Spain. In B. Bradbury, S. P. Jenkins, & J. Micklewright (Eds.), The dynamics of child poverty in industrialised countries. Cambrige: Unicef and Cambridge University Press.

Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In C. Dagum & M. Zenga (Eds.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty, studies in contemporary economics (pp. 272–284). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Cheli, B., & Lemmi, A. (1995). A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes, 24, 115–134.

Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1053–1062.

Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). The social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

EUROSTAT (2002). Income, poverty and social exclusion: Second report. European Social Statistics, Luxembourg, pp. 76–92.

Fahmy, E. (2006). Poverty and youth transitions in Europe: An analysis of the European Communities Household Panel. (Contribution to the Youth Debate project of the European Knowledge Centre for Youth Policy, from http://youth-debate.net/node/4).

Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261–294.

Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.

Heuberger, R. (2003). What household gets what income? (Paper presented at the EPUNET conference 2003, Essex, UK) from http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/epunet/2003/download.php

Iacovou, M. (2002). Regional differences in the transition to adulthood. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580, 40–69 (special issue March 2002).

Kangas, O., & Palme, J. (2000). Does social policy matter? Poverty cycles in the OECD countries. International Journal of Health Services, 30, 335–352.

Lemmi, A., & Betti, G. (2006). Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. New York: Springer.

Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). psmatch2, STATA module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing, version 3.0.0. 13 April 2006.

Magadi, M., Middleton, S., & Stafford, B. (2005). To what extent does the timing and sequence of transition to parenthood and new partnerships among young females in Europe affect the risk of poverty? Paper presented at EPUnet 2005 conference, Essex, Colchester.

Nicoletti, C., & Peracchi, F. (2002). A cross-country comparison of survey non-participation in the ECHP. Working papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research, paper 2002-32. Colchester: University of Essex, from http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/workpaps/pdf/2002–32.pdf

Pavis, S., Platt, S., & Hubbard, G. (2000). Young people in Scotland: Pathways to social inclusion and exclusion, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Peracchi, F. (2002). The European Community Household Panel: A review. Empirical Economics, 27, 63–90.

Rosenbaum, P. T., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.

Rosenbaum, P. T., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matching sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.

Sianesi, B. (2004). An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labour market programmes in the 1990s. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 133–155.

Smeeding, T, Ross, K., England, P., Christopher, K., & McLanahan, S. (1999). Poverty and parenthood across modern nations: Findings from the Luxembourg income study. LIS Working Paper No: 194, Luxembourg.

Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. (2005). Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), 305–353.

Verma, V., & Betti, G. (2005). Sampling errors for measures of inequality and poverty. Invited paper in Classification and Data Analysis 2005–Book of Short Papers (pp. 175–179). CLADAG, Parma, 6–8 June 2005.