Does Greater Diversity in Executive Race/Ethnicity Reliably Predict Better Future Firm Financial Performance?
Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy - Trang 1-16 - 2023
Tóm tắt
In contrast to the equivocal findings in academic research, “the business case for diversity” is the dominant rhetorical paradigm for how US corporations debate actions and policies around racial/ethnic diversity. In this paper, we conduct an empirical test of the paradigm by gathering data on the race/ethnicity of the individuals shown on the leadership pages of S&P 500 firms’ websites as of mid-2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2021, and then determining if any of nine measures of the racial/ethnic diversity of these executives reliably predict cross-sectional variation in any of six measures of their firms’ financial performance over the next fiscal year. We do not find reliable evidence that they do. As such, our results do not support the “business case for diversity” when the claim is assessed using 1-year-ahead financial performance metrics and multiple measures of the race/ethnicity of S&P 500 executives over the last decade.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andrevski G, Richard OC, Shaw JD, Ferrier WJ. Racial diversity and firm performance: the mediating role of competitive intensity. J Manag. 2014;40(3):820–44.
Bantel KA, Jackson SE. Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strateg Manag J. 1989;10(S1):107–24.
Boone C, Hendriks W. Top management team diversity and firm performance: moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity. Manage Sci. 2009;55(2):165–80.
Cannella AA, Park J-H, Lee H-U. Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Acad Manag J. 2008;51(4):768–84.
Certo ST, Lester RH, Dalton CM, Dalton DR. Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: a meta-analytic examination. J Manage Stud. 2006;43(4):813–39.
Cox T. Cultural diversity in organizations: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 1993.
Cox TH, Blake S. Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness. Acad Manag Perspect. 1991;5(3):45–56.
Demsetz H. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. J Law Econ. 1983;26(2):375–90.
Demsetz H, Lehn K. The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. J Polit Econ. 1985;93(6):1155–77.
Demsetz H, Villalonga B. Ownership structure and corporate performance. J Corp Finan. 2001;7:209–33.
Edmans A, Flammer C, Glossner S. Diversity, equity, and inclusion. 2023 Working paper, European Governance Institute.
Georgeac OAM, Rattan A. The business case for diversity backfires: detrimental effects of organizations’ instrumental diversity rhetoric for underrepresented group members’ sense of belonging. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023;124(1):69–108.
Gonzalez JA, DeNisi AS. Cross-level effects of demography and diversity climate on organizational attachment and firm effectiveness. J Organ Behav. 2009;30(1):21–40.
Green J, Hand JRM. Measuring and calibrating the racial/ethnic densities of executives in US publicly traded firms. Working paper, UNC–Chapel Hill; 2022.
Hambrick DC, Mason PA. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev. 1984;9(2):193–206.
Hambrick DC, Quigley TJ. Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strateg Manag J. 2014;35(4):473–91.
Harrison DA, Klein KJ. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32(4):1199–228.
Herring C. Does diversity pay? Race, gender and the business case for diversity. Am Sociol Rev. 2009;74(2):208–24.
Holger D. The business case for more diversity. Wall Street J. 2019;19:2019.
Jeong S-H, Harrison DA. Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: meta-analytic outcomes of women as CEOs and TMT members. Acad Manag J. 2017;60(4):1219–52.
Kim M. If your boss is still asking about the “business case” for diversity, your company’s in trouble. 2018 Medium.com, 3/26/18.
Larcker D, Tayan B. Diversity in the C-suite: the dismal state of diversity among Fortune 100 senior executives (Stanford: Rock Center for Corporate Governance, Apr. 1, 2020); 2020.
Lorenzo R, Reeves M. How and where diversity drives financial performance. Harvard Bus Rev 2018.
Lorenzo R, Voigt N, Schetelig K, Zawadzki A, Welpe IM, Brosi P. The mix that matters (Boston Consulting Group, Apr. 2017). 2017.
Lorenzo R, Voigt N, Tsusaka M, Krentz M, Abouzahr K. How diverse leadership teams boost innovation (Boston Consulting Group, Nov. 2018) 2018.
Mackey A. The effect of CEOs on firm performance. Strateg Manag J. 2008;29(12):1357–67.
Margarethe FW, Bantel KA. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad Manag J. 1992;35(1):91–121.
McKinsey: Hunt V, Layton D, Prince S. Diversity matters (London: McKinsey and Company, Feb. 2, 2015). 2015
McKinsey: Hunt V, Prince S, Dixon-Fyle S, Yee L 2018. Delivering through diversity (London: McKinsey and Company, January 2018).
McKinsey: Hunt V, Prince S, Dixon-Fyle S, Dolan K 2020. Diversity wins: how inclusion matters (London: McKinsey and Company, May 2020).
Miller CC, Chiu S, Wesley CL II, Vera D, Avery DR. Cognitive diversity at the strategic apex: assessing evidence on the value of different perspectives and ideas among senior leaders. Acad Manag Ann. 2022;16(2):806–52.
Noland M, Moran T, Kotschwar B. Is gender diversity profitable? Evidence from a global survey. Working paper, Peterson Institute for International Economics. 2016.
Parks GS. “When they see us” the Great White awakening to Black humanity. U. Md. LJ Race, Religion, Gender & Class 2021; 21: 1.
Posch M, Schulz J, Henrich J. Surname diversity, social ties and innovation. Working paper, University of Exeter. 2023.
Post C, Byron K. Women on boards and firm financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manag J. 2015;58(5):1546–71.
Qian C, Cao Q, Takeuchi R. Top management team functional diversity and organizational innovation in China: the moderating effects of environment. Strateg Manag J. 2013;34(1):110–20.
Ren T, Wang Z. Female participation in TMT and firm performance: evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Nankai Bus Rev Int. 2011;2(2):140–57.
Richard OC. Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: a resource-based view. Acad Manag J. 2000;43(2):164–77.
Richard OC, Triana MDC, Li M. The effects of racial diversity congruence between upper management and lower management on firm productivity. Acad Manag J. 2020;64(5):1355–82.
Roberson QM. Diversity in the workplace: a review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annu Rev Organ Psych Organ Behav. 2019;6(1):69–88.
Roberson QM, Park HJ. Examining the link between diversity and firm performance: the effects of diversity reputation and leader racial diversity. Group Org Manag. 2007;32(5):548–68.
Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal (27: 379–423, July). 1948.
Solal I, Snellman K. Women don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board composition. Org Sci. 2019;30(6):1270–88.
Stigler J, Friedland C. The literature of economics: the case of Berle and Means. J Law Econ. 1983;26(2):237–68.
Williams KY, O’Reilly CA. Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Res Org Behav. 1998;20:77–140.
Wittenberg A. Why diversity is good for your bottom line. Fortune. 2017.
Zhang L. An institutional approach to gender diversity and firm performance. Organ Sci. 2020;31(2):439–57.