Does Cultural Distance Hinder Trade in Goods? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Member Nations
Tóm tắt
We examine the effect of cultural distance, a proxy for the lack of a minimum reservoir of trust necessary to initiate and complete trade deals, on bilateral trade flows. Employing data for 67 countries that span the years 1996–2001, we estimate a series of modified gravity specifications and find that cultural dissimilarity between nations has an economically significant and consistently negative effect on aggregate and disaggregated trade flows; however, estimated effects vary in magnitude and economic significance across measures of trade and our cohort of OECD reference countries. The consistently negative influence of cultural distance indicates that policymakers may wish to consider mechanisms that enhance the build-up of trust and commitment when seeking to facilitate the initiation and completion of international trade deals. Our findings also imply that coefficient estimates from related studies that do not account for the trade-inhibiting effect of cultural distance may be biased.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69(1):106–116 March
Anderson E, Gatignon H (1996) Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions. J Int Bus Stud 17(3):1–26 September doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490432
Agarwal S (1994) Socio-cultural distance and the choice of joint ventures: a contingency perspective. J Int Mark 2:63–80
Barkema HG, Shenkar O, Vermeulen F, Bell JHJ (1997) Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Acad Manage J 40(2):426–442 April doi:10.2307/256889
Boisso D, Ferrantino M (1997) Economic distance, cultural distance, and openness in international trade: empirical puzzles. J Econ Integration 12(4):456–484 December
Campbell NCG, Graham JL, Jolibert A, Meissner HG (1988) Marketing negotiations in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. J Mark 52(2):49–62 April doi:10.2307/1251264
Deardorff AV (2004) Local comparative advantage: trade costs and the pattern of trade. Research Seminar in International Economics Discussion Paper #500, University of Michigan
Dunlevy JA (2006) The impact of corruption and language on the pro-trade effect of immigrants: Evidence from the American States. Rev Econ Stat 88(1):182–186 July
Eaton J, Tamura A (1994) Bilateralism and regionalism in Japanese and U.S. trade and foreign direct investment patterns. J Jpn Int Econ 8(4):478–510 December doi:10.1006/jjie.1994.1025
Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004) Are regional trading agreements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. J Int Econ 63(2):369–395 July doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00058-8
Gould DM (1994) Immigration links to the home country: empirical implications for US bilateral trade flows. Rev Econ Stat 76(2):302–316 May doi:10.2307/2109884
Graham JL, Kim DK, Lin C-Y, Robinson M (1988) Buyer-seller negotiations around the Pacific Rim: Differences in fundamental exchange processes. J Consum Res 15(1):48–54 June doi:10.1086/209144
Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2005) Cultural biases in economic exchange, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 11005. NBER, Cambridge
Hagenaars J, Kalman L, Moors G (2003) Exploring Europe’s basic values map. In: Arts W, Hagenaars J, Halman L (eds) The cultural diversity of European unity. Koninklijke Brill, Boston
Head K, Ries J (1998) Immigration and trade creation: econometric evidence from Canada. Can J Econ 31(1):47–62 February doi:10.2307/136376
Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international difference in work related values. Sage, Beverly Hills
Hutchinson WK (2002) Does ease of communication increase trade? Commonality of language and bilateral trade. Scott J Polit Econ 49(5):544–556 November doi:10.1111/1467-9485.00247
Inglehart R, Basanez M, Diez-Medrano J, Halman L, Luijkx R (eds) (2004) In: Human beliefs and values: a cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 values surveys. Siglo Veintiuno Editores, S.A. de C.V., Mexico City
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2007) International financial statistics [computer file]. IMF, Washington, DC (November)
Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J Int Bus Stud 19(3):411–432 September doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394
Larimo J (2003) Form of investment by Nordic firms in world markets. J Bus Res 56(10):791–803 October doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00467-8
Linders G-J, Slangen A, deGroot HLF, Beugelsdijk S (2005) Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper-TI-2005-074/3, The Netherlands
Migration Policy Institute (2007) Country and comparative data, Washington, DC. http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/comparative.cfm. Accessed November, 2007
Neal M (1998) The culture factor: cross-national management and foreign venture. MacMillan, Houndmills
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007) SourceOECD STAN Bilateral Trade Database. http://fiordiliji.sourceoecd.org/vl=7411482/cl=27/nw=1/rpsv/home.htm. Accessed November, 2007
Ranjan P, Tobias J (2005) Bayes and gravity, WP# 05026. Iowa State University, Ames (October)
Tadesse B, White R (2007) Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: Do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences? Appl Econ Lett (in press)
Tinbergen J (1962) The world economy. Suggestions for an international economic policy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York
United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2006) CIA world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html. Accessed November 2007
Wagner D, Head K, Ries J (2002) Immigration and the trade of provinces. Scott J Polit Econ 49(5):507–525 December doi:10.1111/1467-9485.00245
White R, Tadesse B (2007) Immigration policy, cultural pluralism and trade: evidence from the White Australia Policy. Pac Econ Rev 12(4):489–509 October doi:10.1111/j.1468-0106.2007.00368.x
World Bank (2006) World development indicators: CD-ROM version. Development Data Group of the World Bank’s International Economics Department, Washington, DC