Do people with shortened dental arches have worse oral health‐related quality of life than those with more natural teeth? A population‐based study

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology - Tập 43 Số 1 - Trang 33-46 - 2015
Haiping Tan1,2,3,4, Karen Glazer Peres1, Marco Aurélio Peres1
1Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
2Fax: +61 8 8313 3070
3Haiping Tan, Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, Level 1, 122 Frome Street, Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
4Tel: +61 8 8313 4044

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectiveTo test whether people with shortened dental arches (SDA) have impaired oral health‐related quality of life than those with more natural teeth.MethodWe analysed data from the 2004–2006 Australian National Survey of Adult Oral Health (including telephone interview, oral epidemiological examinations and mailed questionnaire). Participants aged ≥15 years and with intact anterior teeth were eligible in this study. We used multivariable negative binomial regression analyses to test the association of SDA, according to two alternative definition (1. having intact teeth and 3‐5 natural occlusal units; 2. having intact anterior teeth and four natural occlusal units), with OHIP‐14 severity and extent, adjusting for potential confounders, including demographic variables (age and sex), socioeconomic variables (income and education), behaviour characteristics (time since last visit, reason for the last dental visit, difficult in paying $100 dental bill and dental insurance possession), and dental outcomes (coronal and root caries, and periodontal disease).ResultWe analysed on 2,750 dentate participants that were eligible for the study. When SDA was classified as intact anterior teeth, four occlusal units and no dental prosthesis, no statistical difference in OHIP‐14 severity or extent was identified compared with those with intact anterior teeth, over four occlusal units and no dental prosthesis. Participants who presented intact anterior teeth, 3‐5 occlusal units and no prosthesis showed 50% higher rates of OHIP‐14 severity than those with intact anterior teeth, over five occlusal units and no prosthesis while their OHIP‐14 extent was similar to that of the reference group.ConclusionSDA is not associated with negative impacts on quality of life, according to both OHIP‐14 severity and extent, when SDA is defined as four occlusal units and no dental prosthesis. When SDA is defined as 3‐5 occlusal units and no dental prosthesis, it is only associated with OHIP‐14 severity, but not OHIP‐14 extent.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s11136-007-9293-2

Carr AB, 2005, McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics, 5

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52253.x

10.1111/j.0301-5661.2004.00144.x

Tsakos G, 2004, The relationship between clinical dental status and oral impacts in an elderly population, Oral Health Prev Dent, 2, 211

Wong MC, 2005, Tooth loss, denture wearing and oral health‐related quality of life in elderly Chinese people, Community Dent Health, 22, 156

Pallegedara C, 2008, Effect of tooth loss and denture status on oral health‐related quality of life of older individuals from Sri Lanka, Community Dent Health, 25, 196

10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02302.x

Ramfjord SP, 1995, Occlusion, 83

10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00319.x

10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00519.x

10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01803.x

10.1111/cdoe.12085

Slade GD, 2007, Australia's dental generations: the National Survey of Adult Oral Health 2004–06

10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654

10.1902/jop.2007.060264

10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x

10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02018.x

10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01625.x

10.1038/sj.bdj.4812252

10.1177/0022034509334155

10.4103/1305-7456.110199

Australian Bureau Statistics Census 2011;www.abs.gov.au.