Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbakumov, 2020, Rasch model extensions for enhanced formative assessments in MOOCs, Applied Measurement in Education, 33, 113, 10.1080/08957347.2020.1732382
Albelbisi, 2018, Mapping the factors influencing success of massive open online courses (MOOC) in higher education, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14, 2995, 10.29333/ejmste/91486
Barman, 2019, 1
Baturay, 2015, An overview of the world of MOOCs, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
Behling, 2000
Berge, 1995, The role of the online instructor/facilitator, Educational Technology, 35, 22
Bonafini, 2017, How much does student engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC affect their achievement?, Online Learning Journal, 21, 223
Bond, 2020, Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1, 10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Broadbent, 2015, Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review, The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Brooker, 2018, A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 73, 10.14742/ajet.3237
Brophy, 2000
Büchele, 2021, Evaluating the link between attendance and performance in higher education: The role of classroom engagement dimensions, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46, 132, 10.1080/02602938.2020.1754330
Chen, 2015, MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains, Computers & Education, 86, 55, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008
Chen, 2015, Who’s benefiting from MOOCs, and why, Harvard Business Review, 22
Cheng, 2013, Exploring the relationship between students' self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement, The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 9, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.005
Chiu, 2018, Factors influencing peer learning and performance in MOOC asynchronous online discussion forum, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 16, 10.14742/ajet.3240
Crossley, 2016, Combining click-stream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion, 6
De Freitas, 2015, Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision, British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 455, 10.1111/bjet.12268
Deci, 1994, Facllltaitng IntemaUzatlon: The self-determination theory perspective, Journal of Personality, 62, 119, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
Deci, 1985, The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality, Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109, 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Deci, 1985
Deci, 1985
Deci, 1987, The support of autonomy and the control of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
Deci, 2000, The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227, 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, 1991, Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective, Educational Psychologist, 26, 325, 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
Deng, 2019, Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs, Computers & Education, 129, 48, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019
Deng, 2020, Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation, British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 245, 10.1111/bjet.12810
Elizondo-Garcia, 2020, Peer feedback in learner-learner interaction practices. Mixed methods study on an xMOOC, Electronic Journal of E-learning, 18, 122, 10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.002
Ferguson, 1993, Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, 84, 10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00092.x
Handoko, 2019, Goal setting and MOOC completion: A study on the role of self-regulated learning in student performance in massive open online courses, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20, 39, 10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4270
Hayes, 2018
Henderikx, 2017, Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap, Distance Education, 38, 353, 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006
Hew, 2016, Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS, British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 320, 10.1111/bjet.12235
Hood, 2016, MOOC quality: The need for new measures, Journal of Learning for Development, 3, 28, 10.56059/jl4d.v3i3.165
Hood, 2016, Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the terrain
Hsieh, 2005, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277, 10.1177/1049732305276687
Huisman, 2018, Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance, British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 101, 10.1111/bjet.12520
Jansen, 2020, Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in massive open online courses, Computers & Education, 146, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
Joo, 2018, Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs, Computers & Education, 122, 260, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003
Jung, 2020, The effects of learner factors on MOOC learning outcomes and their pathways, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57, 565, 10.1080/14703297.2019.1628800
Kaiser, 1974, An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31, 10.1007/BF02291575
Kim, 2016, Perceived learning in three MOOCs targeting attitudinal change, Educational Media International, 53, 168, 10.1080/09523987.2016.1236890
Kizilcec, 2016, Recommending self-regulated learning strategies do not improve performance in a MOOC, 101
Kraiger, 1993, Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311
Kurucay
Kurucay, 2017, Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course, Computers & Education, 115, 20, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
Lan, 2020, Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1, 10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5
Lee, 2020, The influence of successful MOOC learners’ self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and task value on their perceived effectiveness of a massive open online course, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21, 81, 10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4642
Li, 2019, MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach, Computers & Education, 132, 16, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
de Lima, 2017, Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 40, 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630
Littlejohn, 2016, Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs, The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
Luik, 2019, What motivates enrolment in programming MOOCs?, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 153, 10.1111/bjet.12600
Magen-Nagar, 2017, Learning strategies as a mediator for motivation and a sense of achievement among students who study in MOOCs, Education and Information Technologies, 22, 1271, 10.1007/s10639-016-9492-y
Margaryan, 2015, Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs), Computers & Education, 80, 77, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Maya-Jariego, 2020, Typology of motivation and learning intentions of users in MOOCs: The MOOCKNOWLEDGE study, Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 203, 10.1007/s11423-019-09682-3
Milligan, 2016, How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses, The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005
Milligan, 2017, Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18, 92, 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033
Min, 2020, Self-regulated learning in a massive open online course: A review of literature, European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1, 1, 10.30935/ejimed/8403
Narciss, 2007, Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1126, 10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.006
Nawrot, 2014, Building engagement for MOOC students: Introducing support for time management on online learning platforms
O’brien, 2007, A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors, Quality & Quantity, 41, 673, 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Oh, 2020, Design review of MOOCs: Application of e-learning design principles, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 455, 10.1007/s12528-019-09243-w
Osborne, 2002, Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8, 2
Otto, 2019, Can MOOCs empower people to critically think about climate change? A learning outcome based comparison of two MOOCs, Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 12, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.190
Paechter, 2010, Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction, Computers & Education, 54, 222, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
Panadero, 2017, A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pilli, 2017, Students’ Learning Outcomes in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Some Suggestions for Course Design, Journal of Higher Education/Yüksekögretim Dergisi, 7(1), 46
Pintrich, 1999, The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459, 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
Pintrich, 1990, Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33, 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Pintrich, 1991
Pozón-López, 2021, Perceived user satisfaction and intention to use massive open online courses (MOOCs), Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 85, 10.1007/s12528-020-09257-9
Preacher, 2008, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879, 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Rabin, 2020, What are the barriers to learners’ satisfaction in MOOCs and what predicts them? The role of age, intention, self-regulation, self-efficacy and motivation, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 119, 10.14742/ajet.5919
Rabin, 2019, An empirical investigation of the antecedents of learner-centered outcome measures in MOOCs, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1, 10.1186/s41239-019-0144-3
Ratelle, 2007, Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734
Rodriguez, 2017, Developing self-efficacy through a massive open online course on study skills, Open Praxis, 9, 335, 10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.659
Ryan, 1989, Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
Ryan, 2000, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54, 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, 2002, Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective
Schultz, 1985, Levene’s test for relative variation, Systematic Zoology, 34, 449, 10.2307/2413207
Semenova, 2020, The role of learners’ motivation in MOOC completion, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1-15
Simonson, 1979, Designing instruction for attitudinal outcomes, Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 15, 10.1007/BF02984375
Stroet, 2013, Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature, Educational Research Review, 9, 65, 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003
Tang, 2018, Exploring the temporal dimension of forum participation in MOOCs, Distance Education, 39, 353, 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476841
Theil, 1961, Testing the independence of regression disturbances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 793, 10.1080/01621459.1961.10482126
Tseng, 2016, Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11, 1, 10.1186/s41039-016-0033-5
Vansteenkiste, 2009, Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters, Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671, 10.1037/a0015083
Wang, 2013, Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning, Distance Education, 34, 302, 10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
Wang, 2015, Investigating how student’s cognitive behavior in MOOC discussion forums affect learning gains
Watted, 2018, Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants, The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001
Wei, 2021, Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review, Computers & Education, 163
Williams, 2018, Examining student characteristics, goals, and engagement in massive open online courses, Computers & Education, 126, 433, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.014
Wise, 2018, Unpacking the relationship between discussion forum participation and learning in MOOCs: Content is key, 330
Wong, 2019, Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 35, 356, 10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
Yu, 2010, Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts, Computers & Education, 55, 1494, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.015
Yurdabakan, 2016, The investigation of the prospective teachers' opinions related to peer assessment: A qualitative study, Online Submission, 7, 1
Zhou, 2016, Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective, Computers & Education, 92, 194, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012