Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies

Internet and Higher Education - Tập 56 - Trang 100880 - 2023
Xiaomei Wei1, Nadira Saab1, Wilfried Admiraal2
1Leiden University Graduate School of Teaching, Leiden University, Kolffpad 1, 2333 BN Leiden, the Netherlands
2Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbakumov, 2020, Rasch model extensions for enhanced formative assessments in MOOCs, Applied Measurement in Education, 33, 113, 10.1080/08957347.2020.1732382 Albelbisi, 2018, Mapping the factors influencing success of massive open online courses (MOOC) in higher education, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14, 2995, 10.29333/ejmste/91486 Barman, 2019, 1 Baturay, 2015, An overview of the world of MOOCs, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685 Behling, 2000 Berge, 1995, The role of the online instructor/facilitator, Educational Technology, 35, 22 Bonafini, 2017, How much does student engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC affect their achievement?, Online Learning Journal, 21, 223 Bond, 2020, Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1, 10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 Broadbent, 2015, Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review, The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007 Brooker, 2018, A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 73, 10.14742/ajet.3237 Brophy, 2000 Büchele, 2021, Evaluating the link between attendance and performance in higher education: The role of classroom engagement dimensions, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46, 132, 10.1080/02602938.2020.1754330 Chen, 2015, MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains, Computers & Education, 86, 55, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008 Chen, 2015, Who’s benefiting from MOOCs, and why, Harvard Business Review, 22 Cheng, 2013, Exploring the relationship between students' self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement, The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 9, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.005 Chiu, 2018, Factors influencing peer learning and performance in MOOC asynchronous online discussion forum, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 16, 10.14742/ajet.3240 Crossley, 2016, Combining click-stream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion, 6 De Freitas, 2015, Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision, British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 455, 10.1111/bjet.12268 Deci, 1994, Facllltaitng IntemaUzatlon: The self-determination theory perspective, Journal of Personality, 62, 119, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x Deci, 1985, The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality, Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109, 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6 Deci, 1985 Deci, 1985 Deci, 1987, The support of autonomy and the control of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024 Deci, 2000, The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227, 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Deci, 1991, Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective, Educational Psychologist, 26, 325, 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137 Deng, 2019, Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs, Computers & Education, 129, 48, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019 Deng, 2020, Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation, British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 245, 10.1111/bjet.12810 Elizondo-Garcia, 2020, Peer feedback in learner-learner interaction practices. Mixed methods study on an xMOOC, Electronic Journal of E-learning, 18, 122, 10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.002 Ferguson, 1993, Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, 84, 10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00092.x Handoko, 2019, Goal setting and MOOC completion: A study on the role of self-regulated learning in student performance in massive open online courses, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20, 39, 10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4270 Hayes, 2018 Henderikx, 2017, Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap, Distance Education, 38, 353, 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006 Hew, 2016, Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS, British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 320, 10.1111/bjet.12235 Hood, 2016, MOOC quality: The need for new measures, Journal of Learning for Development, 3, 28, 10.56059/jl4d.v3i3.165 Hood, 2016, Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the terrain Hsieh, 2005, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277, 10.1177/1049732305276687 Huisman, 2018, Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance, British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 101, 10.1111/bjet.12520 Jansen, 2020, Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in massive open online courses, Computers & Education, 146, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771 Joo, 2018, Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs, Computers & Education, 122, 260, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003 Jung, 2020, The effects of learner factors on MOOC learning outcomes and their pathways, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57, 565, 10.1080/14703297.2019.1628800 Kaiser, 1974, An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31, 10.1007/BF02291575 Kim, 2016, Perceived learning in three MOOCs targeting attitudinal change, Educational Media International, 53, 168, 10.1080/09523987.2016.1236890 Kizilcec, 2016, Recommending self-regulated learning strategies do not improve performance in a MOOC, 101 Kraiger, 1993, Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 Kurucay Kurucay, 2017, Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course, Computers & Education, 115, 20, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010 Lan, 2020, Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1, 10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5 Lee, 2020, The influence of successful MOOC learners’ self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and task value on their perceived effectiveness of a massive open online course, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21, 81, 10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4642 Li, 2019, MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach, Computers & Education, 132, 16, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003 de Lima, 2017, Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 40, 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630 Littlejohn, 2016, Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs, The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003 Luik, 2019, What motivates enrolment in programming MOOCs?, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 153, 10.1111/bjet.12600 Magen-Nagar, 2017, Learning strategies as a mediator for motivation and a sense of achievement among students who study in MOOCs, Education and Information Technologies, 22, 1271, 10.1007/s10639-016-9492-y Margaryan, 2015, Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs), Computers & Education, 80, 77, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005 Maya-Jariego, 2020, Typology of motivation and learning intentions of users in MOOCs: The MOOCKNOWLEDGE study, Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 203, 10.1007/s11423-019-09682-3 Milligan, 2016, How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses, The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005 Milligan, 2017, Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18, 92, 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033 Min, 2020, Self-regulated learning in a massive open online course: A review of literature, European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1, 1, 10.30935/ejimed/8403 Narciss, 2007, Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1126, 10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.006 Nawrot, 2014, Building engagement for MOOC students: Introducing support for time management on online learning platforms O’brien, 2007, A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors, Quality & Quantity, 41, 673, 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 Oh, 2020, Design review of MOOCs: Application of e-learning design principles, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 455, 10.1007/s12528-019-09243-w Osborne, 2002, Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8, 2 Otto, 2019, Can MOOCs empower people to critically think about climate change? A learning outcome based comparison of two MOOCs, Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 12, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.190 Paechter, 2010, Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction, Computers & Education, 54, 222, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005 Panadero, 2017, A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 Pilli, 2017, Students’ Learning Outcomes in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Some Suggestions for Course Design, Journal of Higher Education/Yüksekögretim Dergisi, 7(1), 46 Pintrich, 1999, The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459, 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4 Pintrich, 1990, Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33, 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 Pintrich, 1991 Pozón-López, 2021, Perceived user satisfaction and intention to use massive open online courses (MOOCs), Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 85, 10.1007/s12528-020-09257-9 Preacher, 2008, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879, 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 Rabin, 2020, What are the barriers to learners’ satisfaction in MOOCs and what predicts them? The role of age, intention, self-regulation, self-efficacy and motivation, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 119, 10.14742/ajet.5919 Rabin, 2019, An empirical investigation of the antecedents of learner-centered outcome measures in MOOCs, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1, 10.1186/s41239-019-0144-3 Ratelle, 2007, Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734 Rodriguez, 2017, Developing self-efficacy through a massive open online course on study skills, Open Praxis, 9, 335, 10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.659 Ryan, 1989, Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 Ryan, 2000, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54, 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Ryan, 2002, Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective Schultz, 1985, Levene’s test for relative variation, Systematic Zoology, 34, 449, 10.2307/2413207 Semenova, 2020, The role of learners’ motivation in MOOC completion, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1-15 Simonson, 1979, Designing instruction for attitudinal outcomes, Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 15, 10.1007/BF02984375 Stroet, 2013, Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature, Educational Research Review, 9, 65, 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003 Tang, 2018, Exploring the temporal dimension of forum participation in MOOCs, Distance Education, 39, 353, 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476841 Theil, 1961, Testing the independence of regression disturbances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 793, 10.1080/01621459.1961.10482126 Tseng, 2016, Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11, 1, 10.1186/s41039-016-0033-5 Vansteenkiste, 2009, Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters, Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671, 10.1037/a0015083 Wang, 2013, Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning, Distance Education, 34, 302, 10.1080/01587919.2013.835779 Wang, 2015, Investigating how student’s cognitive behavior in MOOC discussion forums affect learning gains Watted, 2018, Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants, The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001 Wei, 2021, Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review, Computers & Education, 163 Williams, 2018, Examining student characteristics, goals, and engagement in massive open online courses, Computers & Education, 126, 433, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.014 Wise, 2018, Unpacking the relationship between discussion forum participation and learning in MOOCs: Content is key, 330 Wong, 2019, Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 35, 356, 10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084 Yu, 2010, Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts, Computers & Education, 55, 1494, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.015 Yurdabakan, 2016, The investigation of the prospective teachers' opinions related to peer assessment: A qualitative study, Online Submission, 7, 1 Zhou, 2016, Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective, Computers & Education, 92, 194, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012