Do functional orthodontic appliances stimulate mandibular growth in class II division 1 patients?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:599.e1-12; discussion e1-6.
Patel HP, Moseley HC, Noar JH. Cephalometric determinants of successful functional appliance therapy. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:410–7.
Aelbers CM, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics: Part I. Fiction or reality—a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:513–9.
Harrison JE, O’Brien KD, Worthington HV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;CD003452.
Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. 2008.
Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104–13.
Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:429–38.
Cozza P, De Toffol L, Colagrossi S. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:293–302.
Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD, Meyer R. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:435–43.
Janson G, Caffer Dde C, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR, Neves LS. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:594–604.
Lai M, McNamara JAJ. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:46–58.
Marsan G. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:140–8.
VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:582–93.
Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A, Sari Z. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:87–93.
de Almeida MR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Weber U, McNamara JAJ. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:540–7.
Sari Z, Goyenc Y, Doruk C, Usumez S. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:286–93.
Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:27–34.
Björk A. The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment. A discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases. Am J Orthod. 1951;37:437–58.
Luder HU. Skeletal profile changes related to two patterns of activator effects. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:390–396.
McNamara JAJ, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:91–110.
Perillo L, Johnston LEJ, Ferro A. Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:132–9.
Jakobsson SO, Paulin G. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:174–84.
Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:47–52.
Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:340–7.
Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR. Class II non-extraction patients treated with the Forsus fatigue resistant device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:332–8.
Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod. 1974;65:586–611.
Kim YH, Vietas JJ. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:619–33.
Nielsen IL, Lagerstrom LO. Individual response to treatments using Teuscher activator. Tandlaegebladet. 1991;95:882–91.
Sander FG. Biomechanical studies on the movement of the mandible in headgear activator treatment. J Orofac Orthop. 1985;46:297–310.
Singh GD, Thind BS. Effects of the headgear-activator Teuscher appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a geometric morphometric study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6:88–95.
McSherry PF, Bradley H. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod. 2000;27:219–25.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:128–37.
Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:1–13.
Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940.
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007.
Riolo ML. An atlas of craniofacial growth. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development; 1974.