Do caesarean section rates ‘catch-up’? Evidence from 14 European countries

Health Care Management Science - Tập 16 - Trang 328-340 - 2013
Wen-Yi Chen1
1Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Republic of China

Tóm tắt

This study investigated the catch up effect of Caesarean Section (CS) birth rates across 14 European countries during 1980–2009 for the first time. The panel stationary test incorporating multiple structural breaks and cross-sectional dependence was used to provide reliable evidence for the existence of the catch up effect of CS birth rates. Our results suggested that the CS birth rates in 14 European countries have mostly exhibited signs of convergence through a steady upward trend from 1980 to 2009. Policymakers in low CS birth rate countries should be cautioned concerning the negative impact of the increase of CS births.

Tài liệu tham khảo

UNICEF, WHO, UNFPA (1997) Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services. http://www.childinfo.org/files/maternal_mortality_finalgui.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2012 World Health Organization, UNFPA, UNICEF and AMDD (2009) Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. WHO, Geneva Gibbin L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F (2010) The global numbers and costs of additional needed and unnecessary Caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as barrier to universal convergence. World Health Report. Background Paper. No. 30 Betrán AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson M, Merialdi M, Souza JP, Wojdyla D, Widmer M, Carroli G, Torloni MR, Langer A, Narváez A, Velasco A, Faúndes A, Acosta A, Valladares E, Romero M, Zavaleta N, Reynoso S, Bataglia V (2009) WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections. Reprod Heal 29(6):18. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-18 Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, Wagner M (2007) Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol 21(2):98–113 Wylie B, Mirza FG (2008) Cesarean delivery in the developing world. Clin Perinatol 35(3):571–582 Althabe F, Sosa G, Belizan JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E (2006) Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study. Birth 33(4):270–277 Stanton CK, Holtz SA (2006) Levels and trends in cesarean birth in the developing world. Stud Fam Plan 37(1):41–48 Feng XL, Guo Y, Ronsmans C (2012) Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ 90(1):30–39A Festin MR, Laopaiboon M, Pattanittum P, Ewens MR, Henderson-Smart DJ, Crowther CA (2009) Caesarean section in four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associated care practices and health outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9(9):17. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-17 Ba’aqeel H (2009) Cesarean delivery rates in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year review. Annu Saudi Med 29(3):179–183 Ravindran F (2008) Rising caesarean section rates in public hospitals in Malaysia 2006. Med J Malays 63(5):434–435 Grytten J, Monkerud L, Hagen T, Sørensen R, Eskild A, Skau I (2011) The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean section in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005. BMC Heal Serv Res 11:267 Brick A, Layte R (2011) Exploring trends in the rate of Caesarean section in Ireland 1999–2007. Econ Soc Rev 42(4):383–406 Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Wojdyla D (2010) Determinants of caesarean section rates in developed countries: supply, demand and opportunities for control. World Health Report Background Paper, No 29 Kim B (2010) Do doctors induce demand? Pac Econ Rev 15(4):554–575 Triunfo P, Rossi M (2009) The effect of physicians’ remuneration system on the Caesarean section rate: the Uruguayan case. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 9(4):333–345 Grant D (2009) Physician financial incentives and cesarean delivery: new conclusions from the healthcare cost and utilization project. J Heal Econ 28:244–250 Xirasagar S, Lin HC, Liu TC (2006) Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan. Health Policy Plan 21(4):319–325 Grant D (2005) Explaining source of payment differences in US cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured? Health Care Manag Sci 8:5–17 Murray SF, Elston MA (2005) The promotion of private health insurance and its implications for the social organization of healthcare: a case study of private sector obstetric in Chile. Soc Health Illn 27:701–721 Potter JE, Berquó E, Perpétuo IHO, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, Formiga MC (2001) Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. Br Med J 323(7322):1155–1158 Spetz J, Smith MW, Ennis SF (2001) Physician incentives and timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California. Med Care 39(6):536–550 Souza IP, Gulmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon G, Fawole B, Ruyan P (2010) Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term material outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health. BMC Med 8:71. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-71 Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P (2008) Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 11(1):97–105 Villar J, Valladares D, Wojdyla N, Zavaleta G, Carroli A, Velazco A, Shah L, Campodonico V, Bataglia A, Faundes A, Langer A, Narvaez A, Donner A, Romero M, Reynoso S, de Padua KS, Giordano D, Kublick M, Acosta A (2006) Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America. Lancet 367(9525):1819–1829 Sakala C (2006) Vaginal or cesarean birth? A systematic review to determine what is at stake for mothers and babies. Childbirth Connection. http://www.childbirthconnection.org/pdfs/vaginalorcesareanbirth.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2012 Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100:223–251 Gilardi F (2012) Methods for the analysis of policy interdependence. In: Engeli I, Rothmayr C (eds) Comparative policy studies. Conceptual and methodological challenge, 1st edn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 1–20 Schmitt C, Starke P (2011) Explaining convergence of OECD welfare states: a conditional approach. J Eur Soc Policy 21(2):120–135 Kuitto K, Jahn D, Dupont N (2011) Convergence, divergence or persistence of welfare policy institutions in the enlarged European Union? 6th ECPR General Conference, Reyklavik Nieswiadomy M, Strazicich MG (2004) Are political freedoms converging? Econ Inq 42:323–340 Quah DT (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37:426–434 Carlino GA, Mills LO (1993) Are U.S. regional incomes converging? A time series analysis. J Monet Econ 32:335–346 Bernard AB, Durlauf SN (1995) Convergence in international output. J Appl Econ 10:97–108 Carrion-i-Silivestre JL, German-Soto V (2009) Panel data stochastic convergence analysis of the Mexican regions. Empir Econ 37:303–327 Tomljanovich M, Vogelsang TJ (2002) Are U.S. regions converging? Using new econometric methods to examine old issues. Empir Econ 27:49–62 Carrion-i-Silvestre JL, del Barrio T, López-Bazo E (2005) Breaking the panels. An application to the GDP per capita. Econ J 8:159–175 Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66:47–78 Liu J, Wu S, Zidek JV (1997) On segmented multivariate regressions. Stat Sin 7:497–525 Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No 435 McKee M, MacLehose L, Nolte E (2004) Health policy and European union enlargement. Open University Press, Berkshire Ma KM, Norton EC, Lee SY (2012) Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan. Heal Serv Res 45(5):1360–1375 Klasen S, Launov A (2006) Analysis of the determinants of fertility decline in the Czech Republic. J Popul Econ 19:25–54 Lin HC, Sheen TC, Tang CH, Kao S (2004) Association between maternal age and the likelihood of a cesarean section: a population-based multivariate logistic regression analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:1178–1183 Lin HC, Xirasagar S (2005) Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: a 5-year population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(3):848–855 Ibraimova A, Akkazieva B, Ibraimov A, Manzhieva E, Rechel B (2011) Kyrgyzstan: health system review. Health Syst Transit 13(3):1–152 Tragakes E, Brigis G, Karaskevica J, Rurane A, Stuburs A, Zusmane E, Avdeeva O, Schäfer M (2008) Latvia: health system review. Health Syst Transit 10(2):1–253 Lekhan V, Rudiy V, Richardson E (2010) Ukraine: health system review. Health Syst Trans 12(8):1–183 Kringeland T, Daltveit AK, Møller A (2009) What characterizes women in Norway who wish to have a caesarean section? Scand J Public Health 37(4):364–371 Hildingsson I, Rådestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenström U (2002) Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 109(6):618–623 Bergholt T, O’Østberg B, Legarth J, Weber T (2004) Danish obstetricians’personal preference and general attitude to elective caesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:262–266 Backe B, Salversen KA, Sviggum O (2002) Norwegian obstetricians prefer vaginal route of delivery. Lancet 359(9306):629 Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, Grandjean H, Gratia P, Guaschino S, Heyl W, Taylor D, Cuttini M (2006) Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians’ attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG Int J Obstet 113(6):647–656 Monari F, Mario SD, Facchinetty F, Basevi V (2008) Obstetricians’ and midwives’ attitudes toward cesarean section. Birth 35(2):129–135 Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Fanara G, Albiero A, Priolo AM, Giacobbe A, Franchi M (2008) Caesarean section on request: are there loco-regional factors influencing maternal choice? An Italy experience. J Obstet Gynaecol 28(4):382–385 Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Fanara G, Settineri S, Triolo O, Giacobbe A (2006) Women’s preference on mode of delivery in Southern Italy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(6):694–699 Donati S, Grandolfo ME, Andreozzi S (2003) Do Italian mothers prefer cesarean delivery? Birth 30(2):89–93 McDaid D, Wiley M, Maresso A, Mossialos E (2009) Ireland: health system review. Health Syst Transit 11(4):1–268 Schmid A, Cacace M, Götze R, Rothgang H (2010) Explaining health care system change: problem pressure and the emergence of ‘Hybrid’ health care systems. J Health Polit Policy Law 35(4):455–486 Lo Scalzo A, Donatini A, Orzella L, Cicchetti A, Profi li S, Maresso A (2009) Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transit 11(6):1–216 Barros P, Machado S, Simões J (2011) Portugal: health system review. Health Syst Transit 13(4):1–156 D’Souza R, Arulkumaran S (2013) To ‘C’ or not to ‘C’?/Caesarean delivery upon maternal request: a review of facts, figures and guidelines. J Perinat Med 41(1):5–15 National Institutes of Health (2006) NIH State of the science Conference statement on Cesarean delivery on maternal request. NIH Consens Sci Statements 23(1):1–29 Narayan PK (2007) Do health care expenditure ‘catch-op’? evidence from OECD countries. Heal Econ 16:993–1008