Do Developing Countries Have a Say? Bilateral and Regional Intellectual Property Negotiations with the EU
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbott FM (2014) Trade costs and shadow benefits: EU economic partnership agreements as models for progressive development of international IP law. In: Drexl J, Grosse Ruse-Khan H, Nadde-Phlix S (eds) EU bilateral trade agreements and intellectual property: for better or worse?, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–170
Abbott FM (2004) The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health and the contradictory trend in bilateral and regional free trade agreements. (Occasional Paper No. 14). Geneva: QUNO
Bayne N, Woolcock S (2003) The new economic diplomacy: decision-making and negotiation in international economic relations. Ashgate, Hampshire
BIOTHAI (2008) Fighting FTAs: the experience in Thailand. In: bilaterals.org, BIOTHAI, GRAIN (eds) Fighting FTAs: the growing resistance to bilateral free trade investment agreements. pp. 36–43
Campbell JC (ed) (1976) Successful negotiation: Trieste 1954: an appraisal by the five participants. Princeton University Press, Princeton
El-Said M (2007) The European TRIPS-plus model and the Arab world: from co-operation to association—a new era in the global IPRs regime. Liverpool Law Rev 27:143–174
European Commission (2006) Global Europe: competing in the world. Document number COM 567. Directorate General for Trade, Brussels
European Commission (2012) Trade, growth and development. Tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need. Document number SEC 87. Directorate General for Trade, Brussels
European Commission (2013) Sustainability Impact Assessments Retrieved 6 February 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/policy-making/analysis/sustainability-impact-assessments/
European Commission (2014) Trade, growth and intellectual property—strategy for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in third countries. Document number COM 389. Directorate General for Trade, Brussels
Evans PB (1993) Building an integrative aprroach to international and domestic politics: reflections and projections. In: Evans PB, Jacobson HK, Putnam RD (eds) Double-edged diplomacy: international bargaining and domestic politics. University of California Press, Berkeley
Grosse Ruse-Khan H (2014) Principles for intellectual property provisions in bilateral and regional agreements. EIPR 36(4):207–211
Hassan E, Ohid Y, Diepeveen S (2010) Intellectual property and developing countries: a review of the literature. (Rand Europe. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2010/RAND_TR804.pdf (31 March 2017)
Heron T, Siles-Brügge G (2012) Competitive liberalization and the ‘Global Europe’ services and investment agenda: locating the commercial drivers of the EU-ACP economic partnership agreements. J Common Mark Stud 50(2):250–266
Jones E (2013) Negotiating against the odds: a guide for trade negotiators from developing countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Kuanpoth J (2006) Negotiations toward a free trade area: US demands for greater IPR privileges Retrieved 01.06.2007, from http://www.grain.org/rights/tripsplus.cfm
Kur A, Grosse Ruse-Khan H (2008) Enough is enough—the notion of binding ceilings in international intellectual property protection. Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law Research Paper Series 09-01
Maskus KE (2006) Observations on the intellectual property component of the European Commission’s new trade policy. Aussenwirtschaft 61(4):459–469
Max Planck Institute on Innovation and Competition (2013) Principles for intellectual property provisions in bilateral and regional agreements. Retrieved 6 Feb 2017, from http://www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/ipmpg/content/forschung_aktuell/06_principles_for_intellectua/principles_for_ip_provisions_in_bilateral_and_regional_agreements_final1.pdf
Meunier S (2007) Trading voices: the European Union in international commercial negotiations. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Milner H (1997) Interests, institutions, and information: domestic politics and international relations. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Moerland A (2013) Why Jamaica wants to protect Champagne: intellectual property protection in EU bilateral trade agreements. Wolf Legal Publishers, Oisterwijk
Moravcsik A (1997) Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics. Int Org 51(4):513–553
Morin J-F (2006) Tripping up TRIPs debates: IP and health in bilateral agreements. Int J Intellect Prop Manag 1–2:37–53
Musungu SF (2009) Innovation and intellectual property in the EC-CARIFORUM EPA: lessons for other ACP Regions. IQsensato Studies, 1
Odell JS (2006) Negotiating trade: developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Oxfam America (2003) Make trade fair for Central America: agriculture, investment and intellectual property: three reasons to say no to CAFTA. (Oxfam America Briefing Note 2)
Patterson LA (1997) Agricultural policy reform in the European Community: a three-level game analysis. Int Org 51(01):135–165. doi: 10.1162/002081897550320
Putnam RD (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. Int Org 42(3):427–460
Roffe P (2014) Intellectual property chapters in free trade agreements: their significance and systemic implications. In: Drexl J, Grosse Ruse-Khan H, Nadde-Phlix S (eds) EU bilateral trade agreements and intellectual property: for better or worse?. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–40
Rossi F (2006) Free trade agreements and TRIPS-plus measures. Int J Intellect Prop Manag 1(1/2):150–172
Schelling TC (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Shabalala D (2008) Intellectual property in European Union economic partnership agreements with the African, Caribbean and Pacific Countries: what way forward after the Cariforum EPA and the interim EPAs? Center for International Environmental Law, Geneva
Spence M (2009) Negotiating trade, innovation and intellectual property: lessons from the CARIFORUM EPA experience from a negotiator’s perspective
Spence M (2010) Innovation and intellectual property. Paper presented at the the CARIFORUM-EC economic partnership agreement one year on: regional integration and sustainable development, Barbados. http://www.delbrb.ec.europa.eu/en/epa/one_year_on/EPA_conference_paper_Malcolm_Spence.pdf
Third World Network (2009) EU EPAs: economic and social development implications: the case of the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement. Retrieved from http://www.twnside.org.sg (21.11.2012)
US Chamber of Commerce (2017). The roots of innovation: US Chamber International IP Index. (5th edn, February 2017). Global Intellectual Property Center. Retrieved from http://www.theglobalipcenter.com/ipindex2017/ (31 March 2017)
Valdés R, McCann M (2014) Intellectual property provisions in regional trade agreements: revision and update. Economic Research and Statistics Division, WTO Secretariat, Geneva
Vivas-Eugui D (2003) Regional and bilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world: the free trade area of the Americas (FTAA). Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva
WTO Ministerial Conference (2001) Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health. (WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2). World Trade Organisation, Doha
Yu P (2014) The strategic and discursive contributions of the Max Planck Principles for intellectual property provisions in bilateral and regional agreements. Drake Law Rev Discourse 62:20–33