Disturbance, complexity, and succession of net ecosystem production in North America's temperate deciduous forests

Ecosphere - Tập 7 Số 6 - 2016
Christopher M. Gough1, Peter S. Curtis2, Brady S. Hardiman3, C. M. Scheuermann1, Ben Bond‐Lamberty4
1Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284 USA
2Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 USA
3Forestry and Natural Resources and Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907 USA
4Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Century‐old forests in the U.S. upper Midwest and Northeast power much of North America's terrestrial carbon (C) sink, but these forests' production and C sequestration capacity are expected to soon decline as fast‐growing early successional species die and are replaced by slower growing late successional species. But will this really happen? Here we marshal empirical data and ecological theory to argue that substantial declines in net ecosystem production (NEP) owing to reduced forest growth, or net primary production (NPP), are not imminent in regrown temperate deciduous forests over the next several decades. Forest age and production data for temperate deciduous forests, synthesized from published literature, suggest slight declines in NEP and increasing or stable NPP during middle successional stages. We revisit long‐held hypotheses by EP Odum and others that suggest low‐severity, high‐frequency disturbances occurring in the region's aging forests will, against intuition, maintain NEP at higher‐than‐expected rates by increasing ecosystem complexity, sustaining or enhancing NPP to a level that largely offsets rising C losses as heterotrophic respiration increases. This theoretical model is also supported by biological evidence and observations from the Forest Accelerated Succession Experiment in Michigan, USA. Ecosystems that experience high‐severity disturbances that simplify ecosystem complexity can exhibit substantial declines in production during middle stages of succession. However, observations from these ecosystems have exerted a disproportionate influence on assumptions regarding the trajectory and magnitude of age‐related declines in forest production. We conclude that there is a wide ecological space for forests to maintain NPP and, in doing so, lessens the declines in NEP, with significant implications for the future of the North American carbon sink. Our intellectual frameworks for understanding forest C cycle dynamics and resilience need to catch up to our more complex and nuanced understanding of ecological succession.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1126/science.1204498

Alig R. J. A. J.Plantinga S.Ahn andJ. D.Kline.2003.Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997 with projections to 2050. US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW‐GTR:i–iii 1–92.

10.1007/s11258-012-0139-9

10.1029/2010JG001390

Birdsey R., 2006, Forest carbon management in the United States, 1600, 1461

Birdsey R. A., 2007, The First State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR): The North American Carbon budget and implications for the global carbon cycle, 117

10.1007/s10661-012-3051-9

10.1007/s10021-011-9460-8

10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1305:RCAFRF]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/b97397

10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0356:MNPPIF]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00574-6

10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.042

10.1111/gcb.12622

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2683:FRTCWR]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.011

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01365.x

10.1111/ele.12345

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02281.x

10.1890/ES13-00370.1

10.1139/X10-184

10.1890/14-1012.1

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01735.x

10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-115540

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.025

10.1038/ncomms2328

10.1007/s10021-002-0130-8

10.1111/geb.12245

10.1641/B580708

10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.027

10.1890/12-1554.1

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02274.x

10.1016/0169-5347(96)10042-2

10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17441.x

10.1007/s10021-012-9596-1

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.031

10.1029/2010JG001495

10.1029/2010GB003942

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02543.x

10.1890/120039

10.1139/X10-064

10.1038/nature12291

Kira T., 1967, Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the Western Pacific, Japanese Journal of Ecology, 17, 70

10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00115-1

10.2307/1936836

10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.003

10.1038/nature07276

10.1038/nature05847

10.1038/nature13470

10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4

10.1126/science.164.3877.262

Oswalt S. N., 2014, U.S. Forest resource facts and historical trends. FS‐1035

10.5194/bg-8-715-2011

10.1126/science.1201609

10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.001

10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.006

10.1007/s00442-014-3150-0

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00866.x

10.1890/11-0306.1

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.026

10.1098/rspb.2011.2270

10.1073/pnas.0810076106

10.1098/rstb.2010.0102

Runkle J. R, 1985, Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. Pages 17–33 in S. T. A. Pickett and P. S. White, editors., The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics.

10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x

10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.008

10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.09.009

10.1007/978-3-540-92706-8_15

10.1007/s10021-012-9587-2

10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00572-2

10.1007/s10342-013-0759-1

Spies T. A., 1998, Forest structure: a key to the ecosystem, Northwest Science, 72, 34

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01864.x

10.1674/0003-0031(2002)148[0002:OHYORO]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01587.x

10.1890/14-1810.1

10.1073/pnas.1320761111

10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.7

10.1371/journal.pone.0072540

10.1126/science.277.5330.1300

United State Department of Agriculture (USDA).2013.Forest Inventory and Analysis Online (FIDO).http://apps.fs.fed.us/fido/

10.1029/2006JG000293

10.1111/gcb.12152

10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.024

10.1007/s004840050097

10.1029/2010GB003947

10.1023/A:1016522509857