Distinguish between focus and newness: An ERP study

Almor, 1999, Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: the informational load hypothesis, Psychological Riview, 106, 748, 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.748 Anderson, 2005, An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy, Brain and Language, 94, 200, 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.001 Beaver, 2007, When semantics meets phonetics: acoustical studies of second-occurrence focus, Language, 83, 245, 10.1353/lan.2007.0053 Benatar, 2014, Newness, givenness and discourse updating: evidence from eye movements, Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 1, 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003 van Berkum, 1999, Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657, 10.1162/089892999563724 Besson, 1993, The many facets of repetition: a cued-recall and event-related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1115 Besson, 1992, An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 132, 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.2.132 Birch, 1995, The effect of focus on memory for words in sentences, Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 232, 10.1006/jmla.1995.1011 Birch, 2010, Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading, Memory & Cognition, 38, 740, 10.3758/MC.38.6.740 Bornkessel, 2003, Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: the role of inter-versus intrasentential predictions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 871 Breen, 2010, Acoustic correlates of information structure, Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1044, 10.1080/01690965.2010.504378 Camblin, 2007, Processing new and repeated names: effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP, Brain Research, 1146, 172, 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.033 Carretié, 2001, Emotion, attention and the “negativity bias”, studied through event-related potentials, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41, 75, 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00195-1 Chen, 2012, Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse, PLoS One, 7, e42533, 10.1371/journal.pone.0042533 Chomsky, 1965 Cowles, 2007, Violations of information structure: an electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions, Brain and Language, 102, 228, 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.004 Drenhaus, 2011, Exhaustiveness effects in clefts are not truth-functional, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 320, 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.004 Féry, 2009, The phonology of second occurrence focus, Journal of Linguistics, 45, 285, 10.1017/S0022226709005702 Féry, 2008, Information structure: notional distinctions, ways of expression, 123 Fang, 1995, Hanyu duibi jiaodian de jufa biaoxian shouduan, Zhongguo Yuwen, 247, 279 Filik, 2009, The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 678, 10.3758/PBR.16.4.678 Foraker, 2007, The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: active versus passive representations, Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 357, 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.004 Gonzalez-Marquez, 2007 Greenhouse, 1959, On methods in the analysis of profile data, Psychometrika, 24, 95, 10.1007/BF02289823 Gundel, 1999, On different kinds of focus, 293 Hagoort, 2013, MUC (memory, unification, control) and beyond, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416 Halliday, 1967, Notes on transitivity and theme in English: part 2, Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199, 10.1017/S0022226700016613 Hillyard, 1984, Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 36, 185, 10.3758/BF03202679 Hruska, 2004, Prosody in dialogues and single sentences: how prosody can influence speech perception, 211 Irwin, 1982, Effects of information structure cues on visual word processing, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 307, 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90637-5 Karttunen, 1979, Conventional implicature, vol. 11, 1 Katz, 2011, Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: evidence from phonetic prominence in English, Language, 87, 771, 10.1353/lan.2011.0076 Klin, 2004, Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: how salience influences anaphor resolution, Memory & Cognition, 32, 511, 10.3758/BF03195843 Kristensen, 2013, The interface between language and attention: prosodic focus marking recruits a general attention network in spoken language comprehension, Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1836, 10.1093/cercor/bhs164 Kutas, 2011, Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP), Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621, 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 Kutas, 1980, Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity, Science, 207, 203, 10.1126/science.7350657 Lau, 2009, A lexical basis for N400 context effects: evidence from MEG, Brain and Language, 111, 161, 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.007 Luck, 2005 Ledoux, 2007, Coreference and lexical repetition: mechanisms of discourse integration, Memory & Cognition, 35, 801, 10.3758/BF03193316 Li, 2008, Event-related potential evidence on the influence of accentuation in spoken discourse comprehension in Chinese, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 906, 10.1162/jocn.2008.20512 Li, 2009, Perception of prosodic hierarchical boundaries in Mandarin Chinese sentences, Neuroscience, 158, 1416, 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.065 Liversedge, 2002, The influence of only on syntactic processing of “long” relative clause sentences, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 225, 10.1080/02724980143000253 Liversedge, 2003, Thematic processing of adjuncts: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 667, 10.3758/BF03196530 Luck, 1994, Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search, Psychophysiology, 31, 291, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x Morris, 1998, Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1313, 10.3758/BF03201203 Ni, 1996, Sidestepping garden paths: assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities, Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283, 10.1080/016909696387196 Olichney, 2000, Word repetition in amnesia electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory, Brain, 123, 1948, 10.1093/brain/123.9.1948 Paterson, 2007, Focus identification during sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1423, 10.1080/17470210601100563 Paterson, 1999, The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of short relative clause sentences, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 717, 10.1080/713755827 van Petten, 1991, Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 131, 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.131 Prince, 1992, The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status, 295 Raney, 1995, Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 151, 10.1037/1196-1961.49.2.151 Rayner, 1998, Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research, Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372, 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 Rugg, 1985, The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials, Psychophysiology, 22, 642, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01661.x Rugg, 2007, Event-related potentials and recognition memory, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251, 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004 Sanford, 2009, Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences, Memory & Cognition, 37, 880, 10.3758/MC.37.6.880 Sanford, 2006, Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse, Discourse Processes, 42, 109, 10.1207/s15326950dp4202_2 Sedivy, 2002, Invoking discourse-based contrast sets and resolving syntactic ambiguities, Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 341, 10.1006/jmla.2001.2812 Selkirk, 2002, Contrastive focus vs. presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English, 643 Selkirk, 2008, Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of “discourse-new”, Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 331, 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.8 Semlitsch, 1986, A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP, Psychophysiology, 23, 695, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x Steedman, 1991, Structure and intonation, Language, 67, 260, 10.1353/lan.1991.0098 Steinhauer, 1999, Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing, Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191, 10.1038/5757 Stolterfoht, 2007, Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: differential ERP effects, Cognition, 104, 565, 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.001 Sturt, 2004, Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: an application of the change-detection paradigm, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 882, 10.3758/BF03196716 Swaab, 2004, Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 715, 10.1162/089892904970744 Traxler, 2000, Priming in sentence processing: intralexical spreading activation, schemas, and situation models, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 581, 10.1023/A:1026416225168 Wang, 2011, The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: how focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect, Neuropsychologia, 49, 813, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.035 Wang, 2009, Semantic illusion depends on information structure: ERP evidence, Brain Research, 1282, 50, 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.069 Ward, 2007, Linguistic focus and memory: an eye movement study, Memory & Cognition, 35, 73, 10.3758/BF03195944 Zimmer, 1981, The given-new structure of cleft sentences and their influence on picture viewing, Psychological Research, 43, 375, 10.1007/BF00309223