Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience
Tóm tắt
The emergence of predatory journals is a global threat for scientific integrity, particularly in under-resourced settings such as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A bilingual course on predatory publishing using a distance education approach was developed for Moroccan researchers as a response to the imperative need for training on research ethics to implement good scientific practices. A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted to evaluate outcomes after delivering two education sessions in both French and English. Before this course, 40% of participants indicated that they don’t verify journal quality before manuscript submission and most of them consider Scopus indexing and the impact factor as the best criteria for journal publication. Approximately 50% of surveyees did not have previous information on predatory journals before the webinar. Pressure to publish by supervisors, institutions of affiliation, or funding agencies, was noticed in 43.4% of participants. After the webinar course was delivered, remarkably, the proportion of participants with knowledge on predatory publishing was meaningfully increased from 48.9% to 81%. Importantly, 83.7% of participants indicated that they are motivated to share their new knowledge on predatory publishing with their colleagues. Moreover, the majority of respondents (73.8%) reported that publishing their research in predatory journals may damage their career and professional future. Promisingly, nearly a half or more of participants recommended the use of training based on distance education, surveillance of researchers by their mentors and affiliations, and social networks to increase awareness on predatory publishing. Almost all participants were satisfied with the content of the webinar. Trainers and research institutions in LMICs should benefit from the advent of distance education using webinar platforms to increase awareness on the issue of predatory publishing in their settings.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Al-Adawi S, Ali BH, Al-Zakwani I (2016) Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish. Oman Med J 31(1):5–11. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2016.02
Ali MJ. Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. A Brief Review and Future Directions. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1922713.
Aroeira RI, Castanho MARB (2020) Can citation metrics predict the true impact of scientific papers? FEBS J. 287(12):2440–2448. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15255
Babb MN, Dingwall O (2019) An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals. J Can Health Libr Assoc 40(3):99–110. https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29389
Bohannon J (2013) Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 342(6154):60–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60
Bryson D (2020) Using webinars to support your continuing professional development. J vis Commun Med 43(4):222–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2020.1816811
Clemons M, de Costa E Silva M, Joy AA, Cobey KD, Mazzarello S, Stober C, Hutton B (2017) Predatory Invitations from Journals: More Than Just a Nuisance? Oncologist. 22(2):236–240. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0371
Cobey KD, Grudniewicz A, Lalu MM, Rice DB, Raffoul H, Moher D (2019) Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey. BMJ Open. 9(3):e026516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516
Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Ingoglia G, Manca A, Cugusi L, Severin A, Strinzel M, Panzarella V, Campisi G, Manoj L, Gregoretti C, Einav S, Moher D, Giarratano A (2020) Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project. F1000Res. 9:415. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23847.2
Cortegiani A, Manca A, Giarratano A (2020) Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 33(2):192–197. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000829. (PMID: 31876786)
Cortegiani A, Manca A, Lalu M, Moher D (2020) Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers. Int J Public Health 65(1):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01318-w
Dadkhah M, Maliszewski T, Teixeira da Silva JA (2016) Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 12(3):353–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x
de Jong G (2017) Reasons to temper enthusiasm about open access nursing journals. Contemp Nurse 53(2):262–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2016.1257922
Duc NM, Hiep DV, Thong PM, Zunic L, Zildzic M, Donev D, Jankovic SM, Hozo I, Masic I (2020) Predatory Open Access Journals are Indexed in Reputable Databases: a Revisiting Issue or an Unsolved Problem. Med Arch 74(4):318–322. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2020.74.318-322
Erfanmanesh M (2017) Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus. Collect Build. https://doi.org/10.1108/CB-02-2017-0007
Guraya SY, Norman RI, Khoshhal KI, Guraya SS, Forgione A (2016) Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies. Pak J Med Sci 32(6):1562–1567. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.326.10490
Jeffries PR, Bushardt RL, DuBose-Morris R, Hood C, Kardong-Edgren S, Pintz C, Posey L, Sikka N (2021) The Role of Technology in Health Professions Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004523
Johal J, Ward R, Gielecki J, Walocha J, Natsis K, Tubbs RS, Loukas M (2017) Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research. Clin Anat 30(6):767–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22899
Manca A, Cugusi L, Cortegiani A, Ingoglia G, Moher D, Deriu F (2020) Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding. BMJ. 371:m4265. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4265
Marina T, Sterligov I (2021) Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level. Scientometrics 126(6):5019–5077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03899-x
Matheka DM, Nderitu J, Mutonga D, Otiti MI, Siegel K, Demaio AR (2014) Open access: academic publishing and its implications for knowledge equity in Kenya. Global Health 9(10):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-10-26
McKiernan EC, Schimanski LA, Muñoz Nieves C, Matthias L, Niles MT, Alperin JP (2019) Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. Elife. 8:e47338. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47338
Merritt C, Jack H, Mangezi W, Chibanda D, Abas M (2019) Positioning for success: building capacity in academic competencies for early-career researchers in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 6:e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2019.14
Mertkan S, Onurkan Aliusta G, Suphi N (2021) Profile of authors publishing in “predatory” journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review. Res Eval. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab032
Naciri A, Radid M, Kharbach A, Chemsi G (2021) E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof 18:27. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27
Newton CR (2020) Research and open access from low- and middle-income countries. Dev Med Child Neurol 62(5):537. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14513
Niriella MA, De Silva AP, de Silva HJ, Jayasinghe S (2021) Is there racism in academic medical publishing? BMJ Evid Based Med. 26(6):e3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111487
Owens JK, Nicoll LH (2019) Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals. J Nurs Scholarsh 51(3):356–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12475
Quan W, Chen B, Shu F (2017) Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Proc 69(5):486–502
Rawas H, de Beer J, Al Najjar H et al (2020) Falling prey to predatory journals: experiences of nursing faculty. Int J Afr Nurs Sci 13:100222
Ruiter-Lopez L, Lopez-Leon S, Forero DA (2019) Predatory journals: Do not judge journals by their Editorial Board Members. Med Teach 41(6):691–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1556390
Severin A, Low N (2019) Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases. Int J Public Health 64(8):1123–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01284-3
Shrestha J (2020) Authors beware! Publishing in predatory journals is harmful. J Agric Nat Res 3(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v3i2.32293. (Nepal Journals Online (JOL))
Singh Chawla D. Predatory-journal papers have little scientific impact. Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00031-6.
Singh M, Prasad CP, Shankar A (2021) Publication Charges Associated with Quality Open Access (OA) Publishing and Its Impact on Low Middle Income Countries (LMICs), Time to Reframe Research Policies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 22(9):2743–2747. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.9.2743
Strielkowski W (2017) Predatory journals: Beall’s List is missed. Nature 544(7651):416. https://doi.org/10.1038/544416b
Strielkowski W (2018) Setting New Publishing Standards after the Beall’s List. Int J Occup Environ Med 9(2):108–110. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijoem.2018.1314
Strong G (2019) Understanding Quality in Research: Avoiding Predatory Journals. J Hum Lact 35(4):661–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419869912
Wang J, Xu J, Chen D (2021) Chinese PhD Students’ Perceptions of Predatory Journals: A Survey Study. J Sch Publ 52(2):88–106. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.52.2.02
Ward SM (2016) The rise of predatory publishing: How to avoid being scammed. Weed Sci 64(4):772–778. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-16-00080.1
Wilkinson TA, Russell CJ, Bennett WE, Cheng ER, Carroll AE (2019) A cross-sectional study of predatory publishing emails received by career development grant awardees. BMJ Open. 9(5):e027928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027928. (Published 2019 May 19)