Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: an auditory ERP protocol

Brain Research Protocols - Tập 14 - Trang 77-86 - 2005
Tom Campbell1,2,3, István Winkler2,4, Teija Kujala1,2,3
1Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland
2Cognitive Brain Research Unit, University of Helsinki, Finland
3Helsinki Brain Research Centre, University of Helsinki, Finland
4Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alcaini, 1994, Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory-evoked response, Psychophysiology, 31, 611, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02354.x Barry, 1992, Does the N100 evoked potential really habituate? Evidence from a paradigm appropriate to a clinical setting, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 13, 9, 10.1016/0167-8760(92)90014-3 Berti, 2001, A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices, Cogn. Brain Res., 10, 265, 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00044-6 Berti, 2003, Working memory controls attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm, Eur. J. Neurol., 17, 1119 Bridges, 1996, Word-dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A, 49, 919, 10.1080/027249896392360 Campbell, 2005, The cognitive neuroscience of auditory distraction, Trends Cogn. Sci., 9, 10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.002 Campbell, 2002, Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: further evidence for changing-state disruption, Memory, 10, 199, 10.1080/09658210143000335 Campbell, 2002, Changing-state disruption of lip-reading by irrelevant sound in perceptual and memory tasks, Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol., 14, 461, 10.1080/09541440143000168 Campbell, 2003, The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: evidence from token set effects, Cogn. Brain Res., 18, 39, 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.001 Divin, 2001, The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits, Br. J. Psychol., 92, 593, 10.1348/000712601162365 Ellermeier, 1998, Is level irrelevant in “irrelevant speech”? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio and binaural unmasking, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum., 24, 1406, 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1406 Ellermeier, 1997, Individual differences in susceptibility to the “irrelevant speech effect”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 102, 2191, 10.1121/1.419596 Elliott, 2002, The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change, Mem. Cogn., 27, 654, 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.654 Escera, 1998, Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention switching to novelty and change in the acoustic environment, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 10, 590, 10.1162/089892998562997 Escera, 2000, Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials, Audiol. Neuro-Otol., 5, 151, 10.1159/000013877 Escera, 2001, Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching, Eur. J. Neurosci., 14, 877, 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01707.x Escera, 2002, An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes, Cogn. Brain Res., 14, 325, 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00135-0 Fisch, 1999 Gisselgård, 2004, The irrelevant speech effect: a PET study, Neuropsychologia, 41, 1899, 10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00122-2 Gisselgård, 2004, The irrelevant speech effect and working memory load, NeuroImage, 41, 1899 Gumenyuk, 2001, Brain activity index of distractibility in normal school-age children, Neurosci. Lett., 314, 147, 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02308-4 Hamilton, 1974, Active selection of items to be remembered: the role of timing, Cogn. Psychol., 6, 61, 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90004-8 R.N.A. Henson, Short-term memory for serial order. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, England, UK, 1996. Hillyard, 1987, Electrophysiology of cognition, vol. V, 519 Hjorth, 1980, Source derivation simplifies topographical EEG interpretation, Am. J. EEG Technol., 20, 121, 10.1080/00029238.1980.11080015 Jensen, 2002, Oscillations in the alpha band (9–12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task, Cereb. Cortex, 12, 877, 10.1093/cercor/12.8.877 Jones, 1994, Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: further support for the changing-state hypothesis, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A, 47, 143, 10.1080/14640749408401147 Jones, 1993, Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: implications for phonological coding in working memory, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 19, 369, 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.369 Jones, 1995, Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: within- or between-stream similarity?, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 21, 103, 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.103 Jones, 1992, Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short term memory: the role of changing state, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A, 44, 645, 10.1080/14640749208401304 Jones, 1997, The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound, Br. J. Psychol., 88, 549, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02657.x Jones, 1999, Organizational factors in attention: the interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 25, 464, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.464 Jones, 1999, Modulation of the irrelevant sound effect by organizational factors: further evidence from streaming by location, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A, 52, 545, 10.1080/027249899390954 Jones, 2000, Interference from auditory degraded stimuli: linear effects of stimulus mis-match in the irrelevant sequence, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108, 1082, 10.1121/1.1288412 Kopp, 2004, Neural networks engaged in short-term memory rehearsal are disrupted by irrelevant speech in human subjects, Neurosci. Lett., 354, 42, 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.09.065 Larsen, 2000, Phonological similarity and irrelevant speech, Memory, 8, 145, 10.1080/096582100387579 LeCompte, 1995, An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 2, 391, 10.3758/BF03210978 LeCompte, 1999, On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A, 50, 100, 10.1080/027249897392242 LeCompte, 1997, Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 23, 472, 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.472 Macken, 1999, Attentional selectivity in short term memory: similarity of process, not similarity of content, determines disruption, Int. J. Psychol., 34, 322, 10.1080/002075999399639 Martín-Loeches, 1998, Testing models of the irrelevant speech effect on working memory with event-related potentials, Z. Psychol., 206, 1 Martín-Loeches, 1995, ERP correlates of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity in auditory–verbal working memory, Hum. Brain Mapp., 1, 275 Martín-Loeches, 1997, The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects, Mem. Cogn., 25, 471, 10.3758/BF03201123 Miles, 1991, Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 17, 578, 10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.578 Mäkelä, 2002, Human cortical dynamics determined by speech fundamental frequency, NeuroImage, 17, 1300, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1279 Novitski, 2001, Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials, NeuroImage, 14, 244, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0797 Novitski, 2003, Effects of noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory event-related potentials in working memory task, NeuroImage, 20, 1320, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00390-2 Nunez, 1997, EEG coherency I: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 103, 499, 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00066-7 Näätänen, 1987, The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic responses to sound: a review and analysis of the component structure, Psychophysiology, 24, 375, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x Roß, 2002, Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field, Hear. Res., 165, 68, 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00285-X Roeber, 2003, Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: an event-related potential and behavioral study, Clin. Neurophysiol., 114, 341, 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00377-2 Salamé, 1982, Disruptions of short-term memory by unattended speech: implications for the structure of working memory, J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav., 21, 150, 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7 Salamé, 1989, Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A, 41, 107, 10.1080/14640748908402355 Schröger, 1998, Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials, NeuroReport, 9, 71, 10.1097/00001756-199810260-00003 Schröger, 1998, Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm, Cogn. Brain Res., 7, 71, 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00013-5 Schröger, 2000, Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices, Clin. Neurophysiol., 111, 1450, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00337-0 Schröger, 2003, Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: a behavioral and event-related potential study, Cogn. Brain Res., 17, 347, 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00136-8 Singer, 1999, Striving for coherence, Nature, 397, 391, 10.1038/17021 Tremblay, 1998, Habituation versus changing state explanations of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence from the effects of token set size, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 24, 659, 10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.659 Tremblay, 1999, Change in intensity fails to produce an irrelevant speech effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum., 25, 1005, 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1005 Valtonen, 2002, The irrelevant sound effect and cortical processing of speech and non-speech stimuli, 382 Valtonen, 2003, Visual short-term memory load affects sensory processing of irrelevant sounds in human auditory cortex, Cogn. Brain Res., 17, 358, 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00137-X Virtanen, 1996, MEG-compatible multichannel EEG electrode array, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 99, 568, 10.1016/S0013-4694(96)96575-X Virtanen, 1998, Replicability of MEG and EEG measures of the auditory N1/N1m-response, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 108, 291, 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00006-9 Woods, 1990, The physiological basis of selective attention: implications of event-related potential studies, 178 Yago, 2001, Activation of the brain network of involuntary attention as a function of auditory frequency change, NeuroReport, 12, 4093, 10.1097/00001756-200112210-00046