Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
McFadden D. Computing willingness-to-pay in random utility models. Trade theory and econometrics, chap. 15. In: Essays in honour of John S. Chipman. Studies in the Modern World Economy; 1999. p. 253–74.
de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145–72.
Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55–64.
de Bekker-Grob EW, Chorus CG. Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: an application to healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(7):623–34.
Petrou S, McIntosh E. Commentary: Using stated preference discrete choice experiments to elicit women’s preferences for aspects of maternity care. Birth. 2011;38(1):47–8.
Lagarde M, Blaauw D. A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:62.
Clark MD, et al. ‘A better way to measure choices’, discrete choice experiment/conjoint analysis studies in Nephrology—a literature review. Eur Med J Nephrol. 2013;1:52–9.
Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient. 2010;3(4):249–56.
Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123(18):e426–579.
Reed Johnson F, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13.
Coast J, Horrocks S. Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(1):25–30.
Fraenkel L. Conjoint analysis at the individual patient level: issues to consider as we move from a research to a clinical tool. Patient. 2008;1(4):251–3.
Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.
Coast J, et al. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Econ. 2012;21(6):730–41.
Bridges JF, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.
Flynn TN. Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best–worst scaling. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(3):259–67.
Lancsar E, et al. Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application. Soc Sci Med. 2013;76(1):74–82.
Bell RA, et al. Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):198–205.
de Achaval S, et al. Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(2):229–37.
Fraenkel L, et al. Patients’ preferences for treatment of hepatitis C. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(1):45–57.
Fraenkel L. Feasibility of using modified adaptive conjoint analysis importance questions. Patient. 2010;3(4):209–15.
Gregorian RS Jr, et al. Importance of side effects in opioid treatment: a trade-off analysis with patients and physicians. J Pain. 2010;11(11):1095–108.
de Groot IB, et al. Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals? BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:214.
de Groot IB, et al. Choosing between hospitals: the influence of the experiences of other patients. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(6):764–78.
Meister H, et al. Utility and importance of hearing-aid features assessed by hearing-aid acousticians. Trends Amplif. 2010;14(3):155–63.
Pieterse AH, et al. Adaptive conjoint analysis as individual preference assessment tool: feasibility through the internet and reliability of preferences. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):224–33.
Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Marijnen CA. Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences: an application in oncology. Health Expect. 2010;13(4):392–405.
Rochon D, et al. Elderly patients’ experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee. Health Expect. 2012.
Halme M, Linden K, Kaaria K. Patients’ preferences for generic and branded over-the-counter medicines: an adaptive conjoint analysis approach. Patient. 2009;2(4):243–55.
Ahmed SF, Smith WA, Blamires C. Facilitating and understanding the family’s choice of injection device for growth hormone therapy by using conjoint analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(2):110–4.
Beusterien KM, et al. Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment. Value Health. 2005;8(4):453–61.
Beusterien KM, et al. Patient preferences among third agent HIV medications: a US and German perspective. AIDS Care. 2007;19(8):982–8.
Fraenkel L, Bodardus S, Wittnik DR. Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis. Med Care. 2001;39(11):1203–16.
Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST Jr, Wittink DR. Risk-attitude and patient treatment preferences. Lupus. 2003;12(5):370–6.
Fraenkel L, et al. Informed choice and the widespread use of antiinflammatory drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(2):210–4.
Fraenkel L, et al. Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(11):1372–8.
Fraenkel L, et al. Are preferences for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors influenced by the certainty effect? J Rheumatol. 2004;31(3):591–3.
Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(5):729–35.
Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient willingness to take teriparatide. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(2):237–44.
Fraenkel L, Fried T. If you want patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) to exercise: tell them about NSAIDS. Patient. 2008;1(1):21–6.
Pieterse AH, et al. Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients’ and oncologists’ preferences. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(6):717–24.
Stiggelbout AM, et al. Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting? Qual Life Res. 2008;17(4):641–9.
Boonen LH, et al. Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers’ channeling incentives on pharmacy choice. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009;9(4):347–66.
Damman OC, et al. Consumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches. Health Expect. 2012;15(2):197–211.
Davison SN, Kromm SK, Currie GR. Patient and health professional preferences for organ allocation and procurement, end-of-life care and organization of care for patients with chronic kidney disease using a discrete choice experiment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(7):2334–41.
Eisingerich AB, et al. Attitudes and acceptance of oral and parenteral HIV preexposure prophylaxis among potential user groups: a multinational study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e28238.
Gerard K, et al. Valuing the extended role of prescribing pharmacist in general practice: results from a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(5):699–707.
Gidengil CT, et al. Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30(23):3445–52.
Goodall S, et al. Preferences for support services among adolescents and young adults with cancer or a blood disorder: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;107(2–3):304–11.
Hancock-Howard RL, et al. Public preferences for counseling regarding antidepressant use during pregnancy: a discrete choice experiment. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(7):532–9.
Hill M, et al. Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests. Genet Med. 2012;14(11):905–13.
Kimman ML, et al. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(3):328–37.
Kruk ME, et al. Women’s preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(11):984–8.
Landfeldt E, et al. Patient preferences for characteristics differentiating ovarian stimulation treatments. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):760–9.
Mentzakis E, Ryan M, McNamee P. Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity. Health Econ. 2011;20(8):930–44.
Miners A, et al. Assessing user preferences for sexually transmitted infection testing services: a discrete choice experiment. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(7):510–6.
Mohamed AF, et al. Patient and parent preferences for immunoglobulin treatments: a conjoint analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1183–91.
Naik-Panvelkar P, et al. Patients’ value of asthma services in Australian pharmacies: the way ahead for asthma care. J Asthma. 2012;49(3):310–6.
Naik-Panvelkar P, et al. Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(10):961–76.
Pedersen LB, et al. Do general practitioners know patients’ preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(3):514–23.
Poulos C, et al. Consumer preferences for household water treatment products in Andhra Pradesh, India. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(4):738–46.
van der Pol M, et al. Eliciting individual preferences for health care: a case study of perinatal care. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):4–12.
Waltzman JT, Scholz T, Evans GR. What patients look for when choosing a plastic surgeon: an assessment of patient preference by conjoint analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(6):643–7.
Yeo ST, et al. Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy screening: a discrete choice experiment. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):869–77.
Yi D, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to inform randomised controlled trials: an application to chronic low back pain management in primary care. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(5):531e1–10.
Bederman S, Mahomed N. In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine. 2009;35(1):108–15.
Bridges JF, et al. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis. Lung Cancer. 2012;77(1):224–31.
Chancellor J, et al. Stated preferences of physicians and chronic pain sufferers in the use of classic strong opioids. Value Health. 2012;15(1):106–17.
Clark M, et al. Prioritizing patients for renal transplantation? Analysis of patient preferences for kidney allocation according to ethnicity and gender. J Divers Health Soc Care. 2009;6:181–91.
Clark MD, et al. Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation? Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:152.
Hauber AB, et al. Treatment preferences and medication adherence of people with type 2 diabetes using oral glucose-lowering agents. Diabet Med. 2009;26(4):416–24.
Hauber AB, et al. Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(5):701–9.
Hauber AB, et al. Patient preferences for reducing toxicities of treatments for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:307–14.
Johnson FR, Hauber AB, Ozdemir S. Using conjoint analysis to estimate healthy-year equivalents for acute conditions: an application to vasomotor symptoms. Value Health. 2009;12(1):146–52.
Potoglou D, et al. Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(10):1717–27.
Ratcliffe J, et al. Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire. Health Econ. 2009;18(11):1261–76.
van Til JA, Stiggelbout AM, Ijzerman MJ. The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(2):264–71.
Wittink MN, et al. Towards patient-centered care for depression: conjoint methods to tailor treatment based on preferences. Patient. 2010;3(3):145–57.
Ahmed A, Fincham JE. Patients’ view of retail clinics as a source of primary care: boon for nurse practitioners? J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011;23(4):193–9.
Albada A, Triemstra M. Patients’ priorities for ambulatory hospital care centres. A survey and discrete choice experiment among elderly and chronically ill patients of a Dutch hospital. Health Expect. 2009;12(1):92–105.
Bansback N, et al. The effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on anticipated affect and health-seeking behaviors: a pilot survey. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16(10):1165–71.
Bijlenga D, Bonsel GJ, Birnie E. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes. Health Econ. 2011;20(11):1392–406.
Bogelund M, et al. Patient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark—a discrete choice experiment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(11):2175–83.
Bridges JF, et al. Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks? Patient. 2011;4(4):267–75.
Bridges JF, et al. Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods. Trends Amplif. 2012;16(1):40–8.
Bridges JF, et al. Designing family-centered male circumcision services: a conjoint analysis approach. Patient. 2012;5(2):101–11.
Brown DS, et al. Estimating older adults’ preferences for walking programs via conjoint analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(3):201–7 e4.
Brown TM, et al. The perspective of patients with haemophilia with inhibitors and their care givers: preferences for treatment characteristics. Haemophilia. 2011;17(3):476–82.
Burnett HF, et al. Parents’ preferences for drug treatments in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a discrete choice experiment. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(9):1382–91.
Chan YM, et al. Chinese women’s preferences for prenatal diagnostic procedure and their willingness to trade between procedures. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(13):1270–6.
Cheng J, et al. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:15.
Damen TH, et al. Patients’ preferences for breast reconstruction: a discrete choice experiment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(1):75–83.
Darba J, et al. Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(6):1947–54.
de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(3):211–9.
de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Girls’ preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692–7.
Deverill M, et al. Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women’s views on alternative packages of care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(1):33–7.
Eberth B, et al. Does one size fit all? Investigating heterogeneity in men’s preferences for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment using mixed logit analysis. Med Decis Making. 2009;29(6):707–15.
Essers BA, et al. Assessing the public’s preference for surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma: a discrete-choice experiment in the south of the Netherlands. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(12):1950–5.
Essers BA, et al. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma? A comparison of two discrete-choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(6):507–20.
Faggioli G, et al. Preferences of patients, their family caregivers and vascular surgeons in the choice of abdominal aortic aneurysms treatment options: the PREFER study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(1):26–34.
Glenngard AH, et al. Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for ADHD treatment with stimulants using discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Nord J Psychiatry. 2013;67(5):351–9.
Goto R, et al. A cohort study to examine whether time and risk preference is related to smoking cessation success. Addiction. 2009;104(6):1018–24.
Goto R, Takahashi Y, Ida T. Changes in smokers’ attitudes toward intended cessation attempts in Japan. Value Health. 2011;14(5):785–91.
Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2009;18(8):951–76.
Guimaraes C, et al. A valuation of patients’ willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery in diabetes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(3):359–66.
Hodgkins P, et al. Patient preferences for first-line oral treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a discrete-choice experiment. Patient. 2012;5(1):33–44.
Hol L, et al. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(6):972–80.
Hong SH, et al. Conjoint analysis of patient preferences on Medicare medication therapy management. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011;51(3):378–87.
Howard K, Salkeld G. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Value Health. 2009;12(2):354–63.
Howard K, et al. Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2011;14(8):1146–52.
Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Bridges JF. A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation. Patient. 2012;5(1):45–56.
Johnson FR, Ozdemir S, Phillips KA. Effects of simplifying choice tasks on estimates of taste heterogeneity in stated-choice surveys. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(2):183–90.
Kauf TL, et al. Patients’ willingness to accept the risks and benefits of new treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Patient. 2012;5(4):265–78.
Kinter ET, et al. A comparison of two experimental design approaches in applying conjoint analysis in patient-centered outcomes research: a randomized trial. Patient. 2012;5(4):279–94.
Kiiskinen U, Suominen-Taipale AL, Cairns J. Think twice before you book? Modelling the choice of public vs private dentist in a choice experiment. Health Econ. 2010;19(6):670–82.
Koopmanschap MA, Stolk EA, Koolman X. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(2):198–204.
Kruijshaar ME, et al. A labelled discrete choice experiment adds realism to the choices presented: preferences for surveillance tests for Barrett esophagus. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.
Laba TL, Brien JA, Jan S. Understanding rational non-adherence to medications. A discrete choice experiment in a community sample in Australia. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:61.
Lagarde M, Smith Paintain L. Evaluating health workers’ potential resistance to new interventions: a role for discrete choice experiments. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e23588.
Laver K, et al. Early rehabilitation management after stroke: what do stroke patients prefer? J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(4):354–8.
de Bekker-Grob EW, Rose JM, Bliemer MC. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1169–83.
Lloyd A, et al. Methylphenidate delivery mechanisms for the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: heterogeneity in parent preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(3):215–23.
Lloyd A, et al. Willingness to pay for improvements in chronic long-acting insulin therapy in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2011;33(9):1258–67.
Manjunath R, Yang JC, Ettinger AB. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes of add-on antiepileptic drugs: a conjoint analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(4):474–9.
Marti J. Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13(5):533–48.
Mentzakis E, Stefanowska P, Hurley J. A discrete choice experiment investigating preferences for funding drugs used to treat orphan diseases: an exploratory study. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011;6(3):405–33.
Mohamed AF, Epstein JD, Li-McLeod JM. Patient and parent preferences for haemophilia A treatments. Haemophilia. 2011;17(2):209–14.
Morton RL, et al. Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease. CMAJ. 2012;184(5):E277–83.
Morton RL, et al. Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discrete-choice study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):102–11.
Muhlbacher AC, Nubling M. Analysis of physicians’ perspectives versus patients’ preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(3):193–203.
Muhlbacher AC, et al. Preferences for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:149.
Musters AM, et al. Women’s perspectives regarding subcutaneous injections, costs and live birth rates in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9):2425–31.
Nayaradou M, et al. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(2):224–33.
Nieboer AP, Koolman X, Stolk EA. Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(9):1317–25.
Ozdemir S, Johnson FR, Hauber AB. Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care. J Health Econ. 2009;28(4):894–901.
Park MH, et al. A comparison of preferences of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma between the patient group and health care professional group in South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(6):933–9.
Pavlova M, et al. The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: implications for policy and management. Health Policy. 2009;93(1):27–34.
Pereira CC, et al. Determinants of influenza vaccine purchasing decision in the US: a conjoint analysis. Vaccine. 2011;29(7):1443–7.
Pignone MP, et al. Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(1):45–50.
Regier DA, et al. Discrete choice experiment to evaluate factors that influence preferences for antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric oncology. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e47470.
Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009;18(4):389–401.
Scalone L, et al. Patients’, physicians’, and pharmacists’ preferences towards coagulation factor concentrates to treat haemophilia with inhibitors: results from the COHIBA Study. Haemophilia. 2009;15(2):473–86.
Scalone L, et al. Evaluation of patients’ preferences for genital herpes treatment. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(9):802–7.
Schaarschmidt ML, et al. Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: process characteristics can outweigh outcome attributes. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(11):1285–94.
Schwappach DL, et al. Is less more? Patients’ preferences for drug information leaflets. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(9):987–95.
Scotland GS, et al. Women’s preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment. Birth. 2011;38(1):36–46.
Skjoldborg US, Lauridsen J, Junker P. Reliability of the discrete choice experiment at the input and output level in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health. 2009;12(1):153–8.
Sung L, et al. Discrete choice experiment produced estimates of acceptable risks of therapeutic options in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(6):627–34.
Sweeting KR, et al. Patient preferences for treatment of Achilles tendon pain: results from a discrete-choice experiment. Patient. 2011;4(1):45–54.
Swinburn P, et al. Preferences for antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):868–73.
Thrumurthy SG, et al. Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1124-31 (discussion 1132).
Tinelli M, Ryan M, Bond C. Patients’ preferences for an increased pharmacist role in the management of drug therapy. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(5):275–82.
Tinelli M, et al. What determines patient preferences for treating low risk basal cell carcinoma when comparing surgery vs imiquimod? A discrete choice experiment survey from the SINS trial. BMC Dermatol. 2012;12:19.
van Dam L, et al. What determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(1):150–9.
van der Pol M, McKenzie L. Costs and benefits of tele-endoscopy clinics in a remote location. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(2):89–94.
van Empel IW, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):584–93.
Van Houtven G, et al. Eliciting benefit-risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(3):469–80.
Witt J, Scott A, Osborne RH. Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists. Health Econ. 2009;18(6):681–96.
Wong MK, et al. Patients rank toxicity against progression free survival in second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1139–48.
Bansback N, et al. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):306–18.
Stolk EA, et al. Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2010;13(8):1005–13.
Lancsar E, et al. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):466–78.
van der Wulp I, et al. Societal preferences for standard health insurance coverage in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(2):e001021.
Blaauw D, et al. Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(5):350–6.
Grindrod KA, et al. Pharmacists’ preferences for providing patient-centered services: a discrete choice experiment to guide health policy. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(10):1554–64.
Gunther OH, et al. The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(1):212–29.
Huicho L, et al. Job preferences of nurses and midwives for taking up a rural job in Peru: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50315.
Kolstad JR. How to make rural jobs more attractive to health workers. Findings from a discrete choice experiment in Tanzania. Health Econ. 2011;20(2):196–211.
Miranda JJ, et al. Stated preferences of doctors for choosing a job in rural areas of Peru: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50567.
Rockers PC, et al. Preferences for working in rural clinics among trainee health professionals in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:212.
Carlsen B, et al. When you can’t have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors’ priorities in complex choice situations. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(11):1964–73.
Defechereux T, et al. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:39.
Diederich A, Swait J, Wirsik N. Citizen participation in patient prioritization policy decisions: an empirical and experimental study on patients’ characteristics. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36824.
Kjaer T, et al. Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(5):739–48.
Lim MK, et al. Eliciting public preference for health-care resource allocation in South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(1 Suppl):S91–4.
Marsh K, et al. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35(3):460–6.
Mirelman A, et al. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency. Value Health. 2012;15(3):534–9.
Ng V, Sargeant JM. A quantitative and novel approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: a public perspective. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48519.
Philips H, et al. Predicting the place of out-of-hours care—a market simulation based on discrete choice analysis. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):284–90.
Promberger M, Dolan P, Marteau TM. “Pay them if it works”: discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2509–14.
Rennie L, Porteous T, Ryan M. Preferences for managing symptoms of differing severity: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(8):1069–76.
Scuffham PA, et al. Health system choice: a pilot discrete-choice experiment eliciting the preferences of British and Australian citizens. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(2):89–97.
Watson V, et al. Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(2):253–60.
Watson V, et al. Managing poorly performing clinicians: health care providers’ willingness to pay for independent help. Health Policy. 2012;104(3):260–71.
Youngkong S, et al. Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:197.
Arden NK, et al. How do physicians weigh benefits and risks associated with treatments in patients with osteoarthritis in the United Kingdom? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):1056–63.
Benjamin L, et al. Physicians’ preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(6):912–20.
Bhatt M, et al. Current practice and tolerance for risk in performing procedural sedation and analgesia on children who have not met fasting guidelines: a Canadian survey using a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(11):1207–15.
Jackman J, et al. Minding the gap: an approach to determine critical drivers in the development of point of care diagnostics. Point Care. 2012;11(2):130–9.
Mohamed AF, et al. Physicians’ stated trade-off preferences for chronic hepatitis B treatment outcomes in Germany, France, Spain, Turkey, and Italy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(4):419–26.
Nathan H, et al. Treating patients with colon cancer liver metastasis: a nationwide analysis of therapeutic decision making. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3668–76.
Torbica A, Fattore G. Understanding the impact of economic evidence on clinical decision making: a discrete choice experiment in cardiology. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1536–43.
Tsung-Tai C, Heng-Chaing C, Lao-Nga M. Using discrete choice experiments to elicit doctors’ preferences for report card design of diabetes care in Taiwan—a pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16:14–20.
van Helvoort-Postulart D, et al. Discrete choice experiments for complex health-care decisions: does hierarchical information integration offer a solution? Health Econ. 2009;18(8):903–20.
van Helvoort-Postulart D, van der Weijden T. Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey. Implement Sci. 2009;4.
Wyatt JC, Batley RP, Keen J. GP preferences for information systems: conjoint analysis of speed, reliability, access and users. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(5):911–5.
Pedersen LB, et al. General practitioners’ preferences for the organisation of primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):246–56.
Al Hamarneh YN, et al. Public perceptions of coronary events risk factors: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5).
Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2011;20(3):273–86.
Cunningham CE, et al. Preferences for evidence-based practice dissemination in addiction agencies serving women: a discrete-choice conjoint experiment. Addiction. 2012;107(8):1512–24.
Fegert JM, et al. Assessment of parents’ preferences for the treatment of school-age children with ADHD: a discrete choice experiment. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(3):245–52.
Oteng B, Marra F, Another A. Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(1):52–7.
Regier DA, et al. Valuing the benefit of diagnostic testing for genetic causes of idiopathic developmental disability: willingness to pay from families of affected children. Clin Genet. 2009;75(6):514–21.
Robyn PJ, et al. Health worker preferences for community-based health insurance payment mechanisms: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:159.
Scasny M, Alberini A. Valuation of mortality risk attributable to climate change: investigating the effect of survey administration modes on a VSL. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(12):4760–81.
Schellings R, et al. The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:103.
Tong BC, et al. Weighting composite endpoints in clinical trials: essential evidence for the heart team. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(6):1908–13.
Tonin S, Alberini A, Turvani M. The value of reducing cancer risks at contaminated sites: are more knowledgeable people willing to pay more? Risk Anal. 2012;32(7):1157–82.
Vroomen J, Zweifel P. Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German? Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(1):87–95.
Whitty JA, Scuffham PA, Rundle-Thiele SR. Public and decision maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions: a pilot study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(2):73–9.
Idkowiak J, et al. Premature adrenarche: novel lessons from early onset androgen excess. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(2):189–207.
Hole AR. Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):1078–94.
Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications. Value Health. 2003;6(4):474–82.
Lancsar E, Louviere J. Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Econ. 2006;15(8):797–811.
Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(4):535–46.
Ryan M, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome—an application to social care for older people. J Health Econ. 2006;25(5):927–44.
Burr JM, et al. Developing a preference-based Glaucoma Utility Index using a discrete choice experiment. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):797–808.
Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Gyrd-Hansen D. Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles’ heel? Health Econ. 2003;12(6):479–91.
Gyrd-Hansen D, Skjoldborg US. The price proxy in discrete choice experiments: Issues of relevance for future research. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care; 2008. p. 175–193.
Louviere JJ, Lancsar E. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4(Pt 4):527–46.
Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ. 2004;13(6):563–73.
Johnson FR, et al. How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments? Health Econ. 2011;20(3):323–30.
Ratcliffe J, et al. Patients’ preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(3):337–45.
Deal K. Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments. Patient. 2014;7(1):5–21.