Disciplinary breadth and interdisciplinary knowledge production

Lewis E. Gilbert1
1Columbia Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York,

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V. O., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387:253–60.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

John-Steiner, V. and Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Ed. Psych., 41(4), 191–206.

Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice (1 ed.), Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva, 1(1), 54–73.

Schroeder, M. (1991). Fractals, chaos, power laws: minutes from an infinite paradise. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Stokes, D.E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Toulmin, S. (1964). The complexity of scientific choice: a stocktaking. Minerva, 2(3), 343–59.