Dinuclear Monointercalating RuII Complexes That Display High Affinity Binding to Duplex and Quadruplex DNA

Chemistry - A European Journal - Tập 12 Số 17 - Trang 4611-4619 - 2006
Chatna Rajput1, Ramunė Rutkaitė1, Linda Swanson1, Ihtshamul Haq1, Jim A. Thomas1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HF (UK), Fax: (+44) 114‐222‐9346

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe DNA duplex binding properties of previously reported dinuclear RuII complexes based on the ditopic ligands tetrapyrido[3,2‐a:2′,3′‐c:3′′,2′′‐h:2′′,3′′‐j]phenazine (tppz) and tetraazatetrapyrido[3,2‐a:2′3′‐c:3′′,2′′‐l:2′′′,3′′′‐n]pentacene (tatpp) are reported. Photophysical and biophysical studies indicate that, even at high ionic strengths, these complexes bind to duplex DNA, through intercalation, with affinities that are higher than any other monointercalating complex and are only equalled by DNA‐threaded bisintercalating complexes. Additional studies at high ionic strengths using the 22‐mer d(AG3[T2AG3]3) [G3] human telomeric sequence reveal that the dinuclear tppz‐based systems also bind with high affinity to quadruplex DNA. Furthermore, for these complexes, quadruplex binding is accompanied by a distinctive blue‐shifted “light‐switch” effect, characterized by higher emission enhancements than those observed in the analogous duplex effect. Calorimetry studies reveal that the thermodynamics of duplex and quadruplex binding is distinctly different, with the former being entirely entropically driven and the latter being both enthalpically and entropically favored.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Nordén B., 1996, Met. Ions Biol. Syst., 33, 177

10.1155/MBD.1996.1

10.1021/cr9804341

10.1039/b201945k

10.1021/ja00168a052

10.1021/ja00062a007

10.1002/ange.19921040819

10.1002/anie.199210481

10.1021/ic950743z

10.1021/ic970432j

10.1021/ic001124f

10.1039/c39950001191

Yam W. W., 1997, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 2067, 10.1039/a700828g

10.1021/ja00132a012

10.1039/b205312h

10.1021/ic00105a004

10.1021/ja953941y

10.1021/ic9808955

10.1093/nar/19.19.5403

10.1021/bi00159a023

10.1021/bi961675a

10.1021/ja0001355

10.1021/bi0351965

10.1021/ja00122a008

10.1038/3949

10.1517/13543784.8.12.1981

10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01457-7

10.1038/nrd793

10.1038/350569a0

10.1038/350718a0

10.1073/pnas.182256799

10.1021/ja991984z

10.1021/ja003624d

10.1021/ic034749x

10.1039/b316917k

10.1021/ja00067a073

Lincoln P., 1996, Chem. Commun., 2145

10.1021/ja027252f

10.1021/ja0521674

10.1021/ic035109x

10.1021/ic9901315

10.1021/ja052648n

10.1021/ic9605682

10.1021/ic951436w

10.1039/CC9960000701

10.1021/ic011028u

10.1021/ja00072a004

10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80004-1

10.1021/bi00154a001

10.1016/0022-2836(74)90031-X

10.1021/ja034444h

10.1017/S003358350000202X

10.1021/ar50144a004

10.1002/bip.360360211

Job P., 1928, Ann. Chim., 9, 113

10.1021/ic00093a036

10.1006/jmbi.1997.1170

10.1039/b300436h

1980, The Hydrophobic Effect

Eftink M. R., 1980, Biological Microcalorimetry, 343

10.1002/bip.360290215

10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80001-8

10.1021/bi00845a028

10.1021/bi00845a029

10.1021/ja953363l

10.1021/jm010246u

10.1021/ja981554t

10.1073/pnas.081560598

10.1021/jm011015q

10.1021/ja029356w

10.1021/bi981330n

10.1002/1521-3757(20011217)113:24<4885::AID-ANGE4885>3.0.CO;2-3

10.1002/1521-3773(20011217)40:24<4749::AID-ANIE4749>3.0.CO;2-I

10.1021/ja0297988

10.1016/0969-2126(93)90015-9

10.1038/nature755

10.1093/nar/gki782