Dimensions of donation preferences: the structure of peer and income effects

Alcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082–1095. Allcott, H., & Kessler, J. B. (2019). The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(1), 236–76. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. The Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458. Andreoni, J. (2006). Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(1), 1–22. Andreoni, J. (2006). Philanthropy. Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, 1, 1201–1269. Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. A. (2013). Chapter 1: Charitable giving. Handbook of Public Economics, 5, 1–50. Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, D. B. (2009). Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77, 1607–1636. Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737–753. Andreoni, J., Rao, J. M., & Trachtman, H. (2017). Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. Journal of Political Economy, 125(3), 625–653. Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99, 544–555. Bayer, P., Hjalmarsson, R., & Pozen, D. (2009). Building criminal capital behind bars: Peer effects in juvenile corrections. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 105–147. Bracha, A., Menietti, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2011). Seeds to succeed?: Sequential giving to public projects. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5), 416–427. Brown, A. L., Meer, J., & Forrest Williams, J. (2019). Why do people volunteer? An experimental analysis of preferences for time donations. Management Science, 65(4), 1455–1468. Bursztyn, L., Ederer, F., Ferman, B., & Yuchtman, N. (2014). Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: Evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions. Econometrica, 82(4), 1273–1301. Cagala, T., Glogowsky, U., & Rincke, J. (2020). Who to target in fund-raising? A field experiment on gift exchange. Mimeo. Cai, J., & Szeidl. A. (2018). Interfirm relationships and business performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(3), 1229–1282. Carlsson, F., He, H., Martinsson, P. (2013). Easy come, easy go-the role of windfall money in lab and field experiments. Experimental Economics, 16, 190–207. Carrell, S. E., Sacerdote, B. I., & West, J. E. (2013). From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica, 81(3), 855–882. Castillo, M., Petrie, R., & Wardell, C. (2014). Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 29–35. Castillo, M., Petrie, R., & Wardell, C. (2017). Friends asking friends for charity: The importance of gifts and audience. http://www.raganpetrie.org/uploads/8/4/4/3/84436206/friends_asking_friends_aug2017_final.pdf. Cherry, T. L., & Shogren, J. F. (2008). Self-interest, sympathy and the origin of endowments. Economics Letters, 101(1), 69–72. Cherry, T. L., Shogren, J. F., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218–1221. Cherry, T. L., Shogren, J. F., Kroll, S., & Shogren, J. F. (2005). The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: Evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57(3), 357–365. Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M., & Hernán-González, R. (2015). The cognitive basis of social behavior: Cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always Prosocial motives. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 287. Croson, R. T. A. (2008). Differentiating altruism and reciprocity. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 784–791. Crumpler, H., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). An experimental test of warm glow giving. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1011–1021. Dahl, G. B., Løken, K. V., & Mogstad, M. (2014). Peer effects in program participation. American Economic Review, 104(7), 2049–74. Deb, R., Gazzale, R. S., & Kotchen, M. J. (2014). Testing motives for charitable giving: A revealed-preference methodology with experimental evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 120, 181–192. DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012). Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 1–56. Drouvelis, M., Isen, A., & Marx, B. M. (2019). The bonus-income donation norm. In CESifo working paper No. 7961. Drouvelis, M., & Marx, B. M. (2018). Prosociality spillovers of working with others. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 155, 205–216. Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2011). Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1739–74. Eckel, C., Herberich, D., & Meer, J. (2018). It’s not the thought that counts: A field experiment on gift exchange at a public university. In K. Scharf & M. Tonin (Eds.), The economics of philanthropy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Elfenbein, D. W., Fisman, R., & McManus, B. (2012). Charity as a substitute for reputation: Evidence from an online marketplace. Review of Economic Studies, 79(4), 1441–1468. Elster, J. (1989). Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 99–117. Epple, D., & Romano, R. E. (2011). Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence. In Handbook of social economics, Vol. 1 (pp. 1053–1163). Elsevier. Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Nikiforakis, N. (2011). Relative earnings and giving in a real-effort experiment. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3330–3348. Falk, A. (2007). Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica, 75(5), 1501–1511. Filiz-Ozbay, E., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2014). Effect of an audience in public goods provision. Experimental Economics, 17(2), 200–214. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence fro a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404. Fisman, R., Kariv, S., & Markovits, D. (2007). Individual preferences for giving. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1858–1876. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. Gächter, S. (2007). Conditional cooperation. Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and Psychology. A promising new cross-disciplinary field: CESifo Seminar Series. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P. J., Jones, K., & Matthew Leister, C. (2018). Paternalistic giving: Restricting recipient choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 151, 143–170. Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 791–810. Harrison, G. W. (2007). House money effects in public good experiments: Comment. Experimental Economics, 10(4), 429–437. Herbst, D., & Mas, A. (2015). Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. Science, 350(6260), 545–549. Hermalin, B. (1998). Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. American Economic Review, 88(5), 1188–1206. Hjort, J. (2014). Ethnic divisions and production in firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1899–1946. Huck, S., & Rasul, I. (2011). Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 351–362. Huck, S., Rasul, I., & Shephard, A. (2015). Comparing charitable fundraising schemes: Evidence from a field experiment and a structural model. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(2), 326–69. Imberman, S. A., Kugler, A. D., & Sacerdote, B. I. (2012). Katrina’s children: Evidence on the structure of peer effects from hurricane evacuees. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2048–82. Karlan, D., & Wood, D. H. (2017). The effect of effectiveness: Donor response to aid effectiveness in a direct mail fundraising experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 1–8. Karlan, D., & List, J. A. (2012). How can bill and melinda gates increase other people’s donations to fund public goods? In NBER working paper no. 17954. Kessler, J. B. (2017). Announcements of support and public good provision. American Economic Review, 107(12), 3760–3787. Korenok, O., Millner, E. L., & Razzolini, L. (2013). Impure altruism in dictators’ giving. Journal of Public Economics, 97, 1–8. Kroll, S., Cherry, T. L., & Shogren, J. F. (2007). The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on contributions in best-shot public good games. Experimental Economics, 10(4), 411–428. Krupka, E. L., & Croson, R. T. A. (2016). The differential impact of social norms cues on charitable contributions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 128, 149–158. Krupka, E. L., & Weber, R. A. (2013). Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dicator game sharing vary? Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 495–524. Landry, C. E., Lange, A., List, J. A., Price, M. K., & Rupp, N. G. (2006). Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 747–782. Lilley, A., & Slonim, R. (2014). The price of warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 58–74. Lim, J., & Meer, J. (2019). Persistent effects of teacher-student gender matches. Journal of Human Resources. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.55.3.0218-9314R4. List, J. A. (2011). The market for charitable giving. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), 157–180. List, J. A., & Lucking-Reiley, D. (2002). The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 215–233. Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542. Meer, J. (2011). Brother, can you spare a dime? Peer pressure in charitable solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 926–941. Meer, J., & Rosen, H. (2011). The ABCs of charitable solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 363–371. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 129–44. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158. Ottoni-Wilhelm, M., Vesterlund, L., & Xie, H. (2017). Why do people give? Testing pure and impure altruism. American Economic Review, 107(11), 3617–3633. Potters, J., Sefton, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: An experimental study. Economic Theory, 33(1), 169–182. Reinstein, D., & Riener, G. (2012). Reputation and influence in charitable giving: An experiment. Theory and Decision, 72(2), 221–243. Schokkaert, E. (2006). The empirical analysis of transfer motives. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, 1, 127–181. Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). A field experiment in charitable contribution: the impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Economic Journal, 119, 1422–1439. Sieg, H., & Zhang, J. (2012). The effectiveness of private benefits in fundraising of local charities. International Economic Review, 53(2), 349–374. Smith, S., Windmeijer, F., & Wright, E. (2013). Peer effects in charitable giving: evidence from the (running) field. The Economic Journal, 125, 1053–1071. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 58, 267–288. Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2017). Sharing one’s fortune? An experimental study on earned income and giving. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 112–118. Vesterlund, L. (2003). The informational value of sequential fundraising. Journal of Public Economics, 87(3), 627–657. Vesterlund, L. (2016). Using experimental methods to understand why and how we give to charity. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (Vol. 2). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Waldinger, F. (2012). Peer effects in science: Evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), 838–861. www.engageforgood.com (2017). America’s Charity Checkout Champions. Zizzo, D. J. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 13(1), 75–98.