Dimensional reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models with finite rotations and energy‐based mesh sampling and weighting for computational efficiency

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering - Tập 98 Số 9 - Trang 625-662 - 2014
Charbel Farhat1,2,3, Philip Avery1, Todd Chapman1, Julien Cortial3
1Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA , 94305, USA
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305, USA,
3Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Tóm tắt

SUMMARYA rigorous computational framework for the dimensional reduction of discrete, high‐fidelity, nonlinear, finite element structural dynamics models is presented. It is based on the pre‐computation of solution snapshots, their compression into a reduced‐order basis, and the Galerkin projection of the given discrete high‐dimensional model onto this basis. To this effect, this framework distinguishes between vector‐valued displacements and manifold‐valued finite rotations. To minimize computational complexity, it also differentiates between the cases of constant and configuration‐dependent mass matrices. Like most projection‐based nonlinear model reduction methods, however, its computational efficiency hinges not only on the ability of the constructed reduced‐order basis to capture the dominant features of the solution of interest but also on the ability of this framework to compute fast and accurate approximations of the projection onto a subspace of tangent matrices and/or force vectors. The computation of the latter approximations is often referred to in the literature as hyper reduction. Hence, this paper also presents the energy‐conserving sampling and weighting (ECSW) hyper reduction method for discrete (or semi‐discrete), nonlinear, finite element structural dynamics models. Based on mesh sampling and the principle of virtual work, ECSW is natural for finite element computations and preserves an important energetic aspect of the high‐dimensional finite element model to be reduced. Equipped with this hyper reduction procedure, the aforementioned Galerkin projection framework is first demonstrated for several academic but challenging problems. Then, its potential for the effective solution of real problems is highlighted with the realistic simulation of the transient response of a vehicle to an underbody blast event. For this problem, the proposed nonlinear model reduction framework reduces the CPU time required by a typical high‐dimensional model by up to four orders of magnitude while maintaining a good level of accuracy. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1017/S0962492902000120

10.1115/1.1448332

VeroyK Prud'hommeC RovasD PateraA.A posteriori error bounds for reduced‐basis approximation of parametrized noncoercive and nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations.Proceedings of the 16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference Orlando Florida 2003.

10.1007/978-1-4020-3286-8_76

10.1002/nme.1879

10.1002/nme.4271

10.1002/nme.4436

10.2514/2.3128

10.2514/1.11246

10.1016/j.cma.2005.08.026

10.2514/1.24512

10.2514/1.35374

10.1137/100813051

10.2514/1.J050233

10.1002/nme.4274

10.1177/1077546302008001518

10.1002/nme.2681

10.1016/j.jcp.2004.07.015

10.1051/m2an:2007031

10.1002/nme.2309

Astrid P, 2004, Reduction of Process Simulation Models: A Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Approach

10.1109/TAC.2008.2006102

ChaturantabutS SorensenDC.Discrete empirical interpolation for nonlinear model reduction.Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control held jointly with the 28th Chinese Control Conference IEEE Shanghai China 2009;4316–4321.

10.1002/nme.2746

10.1002/nme.3050

10.1016/j.jcp.2013.02.028

10.1145/1409060.1409118

10.1115/1.2900803

10.1007/978-0-387-21792-5

10.1002/nme.1620310103

10.1023/A:1024265401576

MantonJH.A framework for generalising the Newton method and other iterative methods from Euclidean space to manifolds 2012. preprint arXiv:1207.5087.

10.1137/1006093

TournierM ReveretL.Principal geodesic dynamics.Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Conference on Computer Animation Eurographics Association Singapore Singapore 2012;235–244.

Mäkinen J, 2004, A formulation for flexible multibody mechanics. Lagrangian geometrically exact beam elements using constraint manifold parametrization, Tampere University of Technology, Research Report, 2004, 3

10.1002/nme.1620382107

10.1002/nme.1620261105

10.1002/nme.167

10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00216-8

10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00115-1

Lawson CL, 1974, Solving Least Squares Problems

10.1016/j.neucom.2011.09.024

10.1016/S0045-7930(01)00104-9

10.2514/2.1975

10.1016/0045-7949(88)90004-1

10.1016/0956-0521(94)00024-G

10.1002/nme.4363

10.1063/1.1662328

10.1016/0045-7825(92)90123-2

SchererR FelczakC HalsteadS.Vehicle and crash‐dummy response to an underbelly blast event.54th Stapp Conference (Oral Only) Scottsdale Arizona 2010.

10.1002/nme.4371

10.1007/978-3-642-30023-3_28

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Tập 98 Số 9

625-662

Thông tin tác giả