Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer

Modern Pathology - Tập 29 - Trang 318-329 - 2016
Gustav Stålhammar1,2, Nelson Fuentes Martinez1,3, Michael Lippert4, Nicholas P Tobin5, Ida Mølholm4,6, Lorand Kis7, Gustaf Rosin1, Mattias Rantalainen8, Lars Pedersen4, Jonas Bergh1,5,9, Michael Grunkin4, Johan Hartman1,5,7
1Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2St Erik Eye Hospital, StockholmSweden
3Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
4Visiopharm A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark
5Cancer Center Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden
6Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
7Department of Clinical Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
8Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
9Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

Schnitt SJ, Lakhani SR, Anderson BO et al. Human cancers by organ site, breast cancer. In: Stewart BW, Wild C (eds). Chapter 5.2. World Cancer Report 2014, pp 508–526. Ellis, 2014, Tumours of the breast, 9 Goldhirsch, 2015, Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011, Ann Oncol, 22, 1736, 10.1093/annonc/mdr304 Goldhirsch, 2015, Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013, Ann Oncol, 24, 2206, 10.1093/annonc/mdt303 Coates, 2015, Tailoring therapies - improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015, Ann Oncol, 26, 1533, 10.1093/annonc/mdv221 Guiu S, Michiels S, Andre F et al. Molecular subclasses of breast cancer: how do we define them? The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Statement. Ann Oncol 201223:2997–3006. Parker, 2009, Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes, J Clin Oncol, 27, 1160, 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370 Paquet, 2015, Absolute assignment of breast cancer intrinsic molecular subtype, J Natl Cancer Inst, 107, 357, 10.1093/jnci/dju357 Prat, 2013, Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 31, 203, 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4134 Sgroi, 2013, Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population, Lancet Oncol, 14, 1067, 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70387-5 Bahreini, 2014, A meta-analysis on concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect HER2 gene overexpression in breast cancer, Breast Cancer, 22, 615, 10.1007/s12282-014-0528-0 Cheang, 2015, Defining breast cancer intrinsic subtypes by quantitative receptor expression, Oncologist, 20, 474, 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0372 Polley, 2015, An international study to increase concordance in Ki67 scoring, Mod Pathol, 28, 778, 10.1038/modpathol.2015.38 Stalhammar, 2014, Low concordance of biomarkers in histopathological and cytological material from breast cancer, Histopathology, 64, 971, 10.1111/his.12344 Ekholm, 2014, Immunohistochemical assessment of Ki67 with antibodies SP6 and MIB1 in primary breast cancer: a comparison of prognostic value and reproducibility, Histopathology, 65, 252, 10.1111/his.12392 Christgen, 2015, The region-of-interest size impacts on Ki67 quantification by computer-assisted image analysis in breast cancer, Hum Pathol, 46, 1341, 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.05.016 Dowsett, 2011, Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group, J Natl Cancer Inst, 103, 1656, 10.1093/jnci/djr393 Grabau, 2014, Quality- and standardization document for breast tumors, Swedish Quality- and Standardization Committee (KVAST) tSPS, 1, 1 Romero, 2014, A novel model for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer, Diagn Pathol, 9, 118, 10.1186/1746-1596-9-118 Klintman, 2010, The prognostic value of Ki67 is dependent on estrogen receptor status and histological grade in premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer, Mod Pathol, 23, 251, 10.1038/modpathol.2009.167 Reyal, 2013, Long-term prognostic performance of Ki67 rate in early stage, pT1-pT2, pN0, invasive breast carcinoma, PLoS One, 8, e55901, 10.1371/journal.pone.0055901 Hammond, 2010, American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 28, 2784, 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529 Knutsvik, 2014, Evaluation of Ki67 expression across distinct categories of breast cancer specimens: a population-based study of matched surgical specimens, core needle biopsies and tissue microarrays, PLoS One, 9, e112121, 10.1371/journal.pone.0112121 Calza, 2006, Intrinsic molecular signature of breast cancer in a population-based cohort of 412 patients, Breast Cancer Res, 8, R34, 10.1186/bcr1517 Pawitan, 2005, Gene expression profiling spares early breast cancer patients from adjuvant therapy: derived and validated in two population-based cohorts, Breast Cancer Res, 7, R953, 10.1186/bcr1325 Al Sarakbi, 2005, Is preoperative core biopsy accurate in determining the hormone receptor status in women with invasive breast cancer?, Int Semin Surg Oncol, 2, 15, 10.1186/1477-7800-2-15 Nadji, 2005, Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5,993 breast cancers, Am J Clin Pathol, 123, 21, 10.1309/4WV79N2GHJ3X1841 Cottu, 2008, Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2/neu expression and its consequences for the management of advanced breast cancer, Ann Oncol, 19, 595, 10.1093/annonc/mdn021 Yi, 2014, Which threshold for ER positivity? A retrospective study based on 9639 patients, Ann Oncol, 25, 1004, 10.1093/annonc/mdu053 Wolff, 2013, Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update, J Clin Oncol, 31, 3997, 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 Anders, 2015, HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 31, 166, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 Robinson, 2010, A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data, Genome Biol, 11, R25, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 Robinson, 2010, edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data, Bioinformatics, 26, 139, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012, Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours, Nature, 490, 61, 10.1038/nature11412 Eroles, 2012, Molecular biology in breast cancer: intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways, Cancer Treat Rev, 38, 698, 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.11.005 Tibshirani, 2002, Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99, 6567, 10.1073/pnas.082099299 Cleary, 2014, Tumour cell heterogeneity maintained by cooperating subclones in Wnt-driven mammary cancers, Nature, 508, 113, 10.1038/nature13187 Nguyen, 2015, Barcoding reveals complex clonal dynamics of de novo transformed human mammary cells, Nature, 528, 267, 10.1038/nature15742 Gerlinger, 2012, Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing, N Engl J Med, 366, 883, 10.1056/NEJMoa1113205 Kårsnäs, 2015, A histopathological tool for quantification of biomarkers with sub-cellular resolution, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis, 3, 25, 10.1080/21681163.2014.885120 Holten-Rossing, 2015, Optimizing HER2 assessment in breast cancer: application of automated image analysis, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 152, 367, 10.1007/s10549-015-3475-3 Laurinaviciene, 2011, Membrane connectivity estimated by digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry is concordant with visual scoring and fluorescence in situ hybridization results: algorithm evaluation on breast cancer tissue microarrays, Diagn Pathol, 6, 87, 10.1186/1746-1596-6-87 Gavrielides, 2011, Observer variability in the interpretation of HER2/neu immunohistochemical expression with unaided and computer-aided digital microscopy, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 135, 233, 10.5858/135.2.233 Rizzardi, 2012, Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring, Diagn Pathol, 7, 42, 10.1186/1746-1596-7-42 Nielsen, 2013, Proliferation indices of phosphohistone H3 and Ki67: strong prognostic markers in a consecutive cohort with stage I/II melanoma, Mod Pathol, 26, 404, 10.1038/modpathol.2012.188 Fitzgibbons, 2014, Template for reporting results of biomarker testing of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the breast, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 138, 595, 10.5858/arpa.2013-0566-CP Elston, 1991, Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology, 19, 403, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00229.x