Digital field scholarship and the liberal arts: results from a 2012–13 sandbox

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 16 - Trang 5-13 - 2014
James D. Proctor1, Kristen Eshleman2, Tim Chartier3, Lora Taub-Pervizpour4, Kristin Bott5, Juliane L. Fry6, Chris Koski7, Tony Moreno5
1Environmental Studies Program—MSC 62, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, USA
2Information Technology Services, Davidson College, Davidson, USA
3Mathematics, Davidson College, Davidson, USA
4Media & Communication, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, USA
5Computing & Information Services, Reed College, Portland, USA
6Chemistry and Environmental Studies, Reed College, Portland, USA
7Political Science and Environmental Studies, Reed College, Portland, USA

Tóm tắt

We summarize a recent multi-institutional collaboration in digital field scholarship involving four liberal arts colleges: Davidson College, Lewis & Clark College, Muhlenberg College, and Reed College. Digital field scholarship (DFS) can be defined as scholarship in the arts and sciences for which field-based research and concepts are significant, and digital tools support data collection, analysis, and communication; DFS thus gathers together and extends a wide range of existing scholarship, offering new possibilities for appreciating the connections that define liberal education. Our collaboration occurred as a sandbox, a collective online experiment using a modified WordPress platform (including mapping and other advanced capabilities) built and supported by Lewis & Clark College, with sponsorship provided by the National Institute for Technology in Liberal Education. Institutions selected course-based DFS projects for fall 2012 and/or spring 2013. Projects ranged from documentary photojournalism to home energy efficiency assessment. One key feature was the use of readily available mobile devices and apps for field-based reconnaissance and data collection; another was our public digital scholarship approach, in which student participants shared the process and products of their work via public posts on the DFS website. Descriptive and factor analysis results from anonymous assessment data suggest strong participant response and likely future potential of digital field scholarship across class level and gender. When set into the context of the four institutions that supported the 2012–2013 sandbox, we see further opportunities for digital field scholarship on our and other campuses, provided that an optimal balance is struck between challenges and rewards along technical, pedagogical, and practical axes. Ultimately, digital field scholarship will be judged for its scholarship and for extending the experimental, open-ended inquiry that characterizes liberal education.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ayers, E.: Does digital scholarship have a future? EDUCAUSE Review. www.educause.edu/ero/article/does-digital-scholarship-have-future. Accessed 24 Aug 2014 (2013) Coles, R.: Doing Documentary Work, p. 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997) Cronon, W.: Only connect. Am. Sch. 67, 73–80 (1998) Davidson, C.N.: Now you See it: How Technology and Brain Science will Transform Schools and Business for the 21st Century. Penguin, New York (2011) Davidson, C.N., Goldberg, D.T.: The Future of Learning Institutions in a Digital Age. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009) Finkelstein, A.B., Winer, L.R., Buddle, C., Ernst, C.: Tablets in the forest: mobile technology for inquiry-based learning. EDUCAUSE Review. www.educause.edu/ero/article/tablets-forest-mobile-technology-inquiry-based-learning. Accessed 23 Nov 2013 (2013) Jameson, F.: Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke University Press, Durham (1991) Roth, M.: Beyond the University: Why Liberal Education Matters, p. 18. Yale University Press, New Haven (2014) Taylor, M.C.: Crisis on Campus: A Bold Plan for Reforming Our Colleges and Universities. Alfred A. Knopf Inc., New York (2010) Warf, B., Arias, S.: The Spatial Turn. Routledge, London (2009)