Digital Distinction: Status‐Specific Types of Internet Usage*

Social Science Quarterly - Tập 90 Số 2 - Trang 274-291 - 2009
Nicole Zillien1, Eszter Hargittai2
1University of Trier,#TAB#
2Northwestern University

Tóm tắt

Objective. Sociologists of technology propose that not only a technological artifact, as such, but also patterns of usage should be considered when studying the social implications of technologies. Accordingly, we explore how people's online activities are influenced by users' socioeconomic status and context of use.Methods. We analyze data from the Allensbacher Computer and Technology Analysis (ACTA) 2004 survey with uniquely detailed information about people's Internet uses and context of usage to explore this relationship.Results. Findings suggest that high‐status and low‐status individuals cultivate different forms of “Internet‐in‐practice.” High‐status users are much more likely to engage in so‐called capital‐enhancing activities online than are their less privileged counterparts.Conclusion. Results suggest differential payoffs from Internet use depending on a user's socioeconomic background. Digital inequalities might be mitigated by improving people's Internet equipment and digital experience, but they do not account for all the status differential in use.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arnhold Katja., 2003, Digital Divide. Zugangs‐ oder Wissenskluft?

10.2307/2673277

10.1080/01972240600903953

Bimber Bruce., 2000, The Gender Gap on the Internet, Social Science Quarterly, 81, 868

Bonfadelli Heinz., 1988, Die verstellte Welt. Beiträge zur Medienökologie, 141

10.1177/0267323102017001607

Bourdieu Pierre., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste

10.1162/108118000568967

Cook Thomas D., 1975, “Sesame Street” Revisited

10.1177/000312240807300203

DiMaggio Paul andEszterHargittai.2002. “The New Digital Inequality: Social Stratification Among Internet Users.” Presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meetings. Chicago IL.

DiMaggio Paul, 2004, Social Inequality, 355

10.1177/009365027700400204

Hargittai Eszter.2002. “Second‐Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills.”First Monday7.

Hargittai Eszter., 2003, The New Economy Handbook

Hargittai Eszter., 2003, Society Online

10.1177/1461444804042310

10.1177/0894439305275911

Hargittai Eszter., 2008, Social Stratification

10.1177/0093650208321782

10.1177/00027640121957259

Jäckel Michael.2001. “Inclusion Exclusion and the Diversity of Interest: Is ‘Digital Divide’ an Adequate Perspective?” Presented at the IAMCR and ICA Symposium on the Digital Divide. Austin TX.

10.1007/3-540-47749-7

10.1093/esr/jci030

10.5771/1615-634x-2000-4-497

Lenz Thomas, 2005, Mediensoziologie. Grundfragen und Forschungsfelder, 237

10.1177/1461444807080335

Marr Mirko., 2005, Internetzugang und politische Informiertheit. Zur digitalen Spaltung der Gesellschaft

Mason Shana M., 2003, Applying Communication Theory to Digital Divide Research, IT&Society, 1, 40

Merton Robert King., 1973, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations

10.7551/mitpress/7428.001.0001

Mossberger Karen, 2003, Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide

National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 1998, Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide

National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 1999, Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide

National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 2000, Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion

National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 2004, A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age

10.1017/CBO9781139164887

10.1162/asep.2005.4.3.116

10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.09.001

10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

Rogers Everett M., 1995, Diffusion of Innovations

Ryder Martin andBrent G.Wilson.1996. “Affordances and Constraints of the Internet for Learning and Instruction.” Presented to the Association for Educational Communications Technology. Indianapolis IN.

Schulz‐Schaeffer Ingo., 1999, Technik und die Dualität von Ressourcen und Routinen. Zur sozialen Bedeutung gegenständlicher Technik, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 6, 409, 10.1515/zfsoz-1999-0601

10.1007/978-3-322-80848-6_3

10.1177/1461444804042519

10.1086/267786

Van Dijk Jan A. G. M., 2005, The Deepening Divide

Viswanath Kasisomayajula, 1996, The Knowledge Gap Hypothesis, Communication Yearbook, 19, 187

Warschauer Mark., 2003, Technology and Social Inclusion, 10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001

10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00301.x

Zillien Nicole., 2006, Digitale Ungleichheit. Neue Technologien und alte Ungleichheiten in der Informations‐ und Wissensgesellschaft