Diffusion of Tax Innovation and Post‐Audit Settlement

SungsooYoon1, SeungWon Yoo1
1Korea University Business School

Tóm tắt

This study investigates how a tax agency would assess the liability of a taxpayer who has first adopted a new, controversial tax‐saving scheme, which might be employed by other taxpayers. The tax agency’s post‐audit assessment to the first taxpayer influences whether and how the innovation will diffuse among taxpayers. We find that it is optimal for the tax agency to settle the issue regardless of whether and how fast the innovation diffuses. A trial is too costly an option for the agency: losing in court would make the innovation public knowledge, and other taxpayers would immediately adopt the new scheme. Neither the number of other taxpayers nor the speed of diffusion affects the amount of the optimal post‐audit assessment. These results suggest that a tax practitioner who markets a new tax‐saving scheme need not limit the speed of diffusion for fear of an aggressive response from the agency.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Jung, 1995, develops a model

Yoon, 1995, examines an opposite case of

Rhoades, 1997, assumes that a tax

Sansing, 1997, examines two voluntary

Bersten M., 2006, ATO Litigation Practice - What Will Be the Effect of the VOS Report?

Jung W.O., 1995, The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 17, 1

Lipton R.M., 2005, Journal of Taxation, 102, 211

Rostain T., 2005, Working Paper

Rostain T., 2006, Yale Journal on Regulation, 23, 77

Sansing R., 1997, National Tax Journal, 50, 279, 10.1086/NTJ41789257

10.17310/ntj.2005.3.11

U.S. Joint Committee on Taxation, 2002, JCX-19-02

U.S. Senate Finance Committee, 2003, Challenges Remain in Combating Abusive Tax Shelters, reprinted in G.A.O. Rep. No. 04-104T

Vos D., 2006, Review of Tax Office Management of Part IVC Litigation

Yoon S., 1995, Unpublished doctoral dissertation

10.2308/jata.2000.22.1.78