Difficult diagnosis of facial pain: A case report and mini-review

Scandinavian Journal of Pain - Tập 1 - Trang 179-183 - 2010
Satu K. Jääskeläinen1, Heli Forssell2, Olli Tenovuo3, Riitta Parkkola4
1Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
2Department of Oral Diseases, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
3Department of Neurology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
4Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

Tóm tắt

Abstract This case report elucidates pitfalls of clinical and radiologic investigations of neuropathic pain due to trigeminal pathology, and utility of neurophysiologic examination when diagnosing facial pain. Our patient was a 63-year-old woman who developed acute, severe facial pain, first located behind the left eye. Neuralgic exacerbations, paresthesia within lower face on the left and restricted mouth opening occurred during the course of the disease with gradual progression. Brain MRI and CT scans were interpreted as normal at 4 and 10 months after symptom onset. At 9 months, detailed neurophysiologic examination showed severe chronic mandibular neuropathy at the left oval foramen with more prominent disturbance of the thick myelinated nerve fibers than the small fibers suggesting compressive etiology. Guided by the neurophysiologic findings, 11 months after the onset of the symptoms, a new brain MRI with contrast enhancement revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the left temporal bone along the mandibular nerve, exactly matching the site indicated by the neurophysiologic examination. Neurophysiologic tests offer cost-effective, sensitive tools for screening and accurate level diagnostics of neuropathy and neuropathic pain, which can be utilized also in the diagnosis of facial pain. In addition, whenever there are progressing neurologic deficits or neurophysiologic signs indicating expansive lesion, despite initially normal findings in the brain imaging studies, repeated MRI examinations are warranted, preferably focusing to the ‘neurophysiologic region of interest’ to avoid radiologic sampling errors. As no isolated technique achieves 100% diagnostic accuracy, only rational combinations of different methods will result in correct diagnosis of facial pain without unnecessary delays. Treatment of neuropathic pain is often delayed because of difficulties in reaching the correct diagnosis. During the work-up, many differential diagnostic alternatives have to be considered, also in patients with chronic orofacial pain. Table 1 shows the most important differential diagnoses of orofacial pain.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jääskeläinen SK. A new technique for recording sensory conduction velocity of the inferior alveolar nerve. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:455–9. Jääskeläinen SK, Teerijoki-Oksa T, Forssell H. Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain. Pain 2005;117:349–57. Omuro AMP, Leite CC, Mokhtari K, Delattre J-Y. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of brain tumours. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:937–48. Grant R. Overview: brain tumour diagnosis and management/Royal College of Physicians guidelines. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl. II):ii18–23. Jääskeläinen S, Forssell H, Tenovuo O. Electrophysiological testing of the trigeminofacial system: aid in the diagnosis of atypical facial pain. Pain 1999;80:191–200. Forssell H, Jääskeläinen SK, Tenovuo O, Hinkka S. Sensory dysfunction in burning mouth syndrome. Pain 2002;99:41–7. Majoie CBLM, Aramideh M, Hulsmans FJH, Castelijns JA, van Beek EJR, Ongerboer de Visser BW. Correlation between electromyographic reflex and MR imaging examinations of the trigeminal nerve. Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1119–25. Wedekind C, Hesselmann V, Klug N. Comparison of MRI and electrophysiological studies for detecting brainstem lesions in traumatic brain injury. Muscle Nerve 2002;26:270–3. Cruccu G, Anand P, Attal N, Garcia-Larrea L, Haanpää M, Jorum E, Serra J. EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Eur J Neurol 2004;11:153–62. Hopf HC. Topodiagnostic value of brainstem reflexes. Muscle Nerve 1994;17:475–84. Zuniga JR, Meyer RA, Gregg JM, Miloro M, Davis LF. The accuracy of clinical neurosensory testing for nerve injury diagnosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:2–8. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen SK, Forssell K, Forssell H. Recovery of nerve injury after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Diagnostic value of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in the follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:134–40. England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, Miller RG, Asbury AK, Carter GT, Cohen JA, Fisher MA, Howard JF, Kinsella LJ, Latov N, Lewis RA, Low PA, Sumner AJ. Distal symmetric polyneuropathy: a definition for clinical research. Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2005;64:199–207. Løseth S, Lindal S, Stålberg E, Mellgren SI. Intraepidermal nerve fibre density, quantitative sensory testing and nerve conduction studies in a patient material with symptoms and signs of sensory polyneuropathy. EFNS task force/CME article. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:105–11. Treede R-D, Jensen TS, Campbell JN. Neuropathic pain. Redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology 2008;70: 1630–5. Bennett GJ. Neuropathic pain in the orofacial region: clinical and research challenges. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:281–5. Chadwick D. The cranial nerves and special senses. The fifth or trigeminal nerve. In: Walton J, editor. Brain’s diseases of the nervous system. 10th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 102–6. Leffier A-S. Pain influences somatosensory perception—an experimental and clinical study. Doctoral thesis, Karolinska Institute. Stockholm: Repro Print AB; 2002. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders, 2nd ed. Cephalalgia 2004;24(Suppl. 1):9–160. Weaver K, Kraft GH. Idiopathic shoulder girdle neuropathy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2001;12:353–64. Forssell H, Tenovuo O, Silvoniemi P, Jääskeläinen SK. Differences and similarities between atypical facial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain. Neurology 2007;69:1451–9. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Review, criteria, examination and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–55. Freynhagen R, Bennet MI. Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain. BMJ 2009;339:391–5. Berger A, Dukes EM, Oster G. Clinical characteristics and economic costs of patients with painful neuropathic disorders. J Pain 2004;5:143–9.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Tập 1

179-183

Thông tin tác giả