Die Validität dynamisch-veränderbarer Risikofaktoren bei der Vorhersage einschlägiger Rückfälle pädosexueller Straftäter
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andrews DA, Bonta J (2006) The psychology of criminal conduct. Anderson, Cincinnati
Archer RP, Buffington-Vollum JK, Stredny RV, Handel RW (2006) A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. J Pers Assess 87:84–94
Barbaree HE, Langton CM, Peacock EJ (2006) Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 18:423–440
Craig LA, Browne KD, Beech AR (2008) Assessing risk in sex offenders – A practitioner’s guide. Wiley, Chichester
Dahle K-P (2005) Psychologische Kriminalprognose. Centaurus, Herbolzheim
Dahle K-P (2007) Methodische Grundlagen der Kriminalprognose. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 1:101–110
Dahle K-P, Schneider V, Ziethen F (2007) Standardisierte Instrumente zur Kriminalprognose. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 1:15–26
Eher R, Rettenberger M, Schilling F, Pfäfflin F (2008) Validität oder praktischer Nutzen? Rückfallvorhersagen mittels Static-99 und SORAG. Eine prospektive Rückfallstudie an 275 Sexualstraftätern. Recht Psychiatr 26:79–88
Eher R (2009) Zu den Aufgaben der Begutachtungs- und Evaluationsstelle für Gewalt- und Sexualstraftäter im Österreichischen Strafvollzug ’ Grundsätzliches, Ergebnisse und Ausblick. Kriminalpaedagog Prax 37:9–14
Eher R, Rettenberger M, Matthes A (2009) Aktuarische Prognose bei Sexualstraftätern: Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie an 785 Tätern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von relevanten Tätergruppen und Rückfallkategorie. Monatsschr Kriminol 92:18–27
Endrass J, Urbaniok F, Held L, Vetter S, Rossegger A (2009) Accuracy of the Static-99 in predicting recidivism in Switzerland. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 53:482–490
Fiedler P (2004) Sexuelle Orientierung und sexuelle Abweichung. Beltz, Weinheim
Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York
Fleiss JL, Williams JBW, Dubro AF (1986) The logistic regression analysis of psychiatric data. J Psychiatr Res 20:195–209
Grubin D (1998) Sex offending against children: understanding the risk. Police Research Series, Paper 99. Home Office, London
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36
Hanson RK (1997) The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. (User Report No. 1997-04). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa
Hanson RK, Thornton D (2000) Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales. Law Hum Behav 24:119–136
Hanson RK, Harris AJR (2001) A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 13:105–122
Hanson RK, Harris AJR, Scott TL, Helmus LMD (2007) Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: the dynamic supervision project. (User Report No. 2007-05). Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Canada
Hanson RK (2008) What statistics should we use to report predictive accuracy? Crime Scene 14:15–17
Hanson RK, Bourgon G, Helmus L, Hodgson S (2009) The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: a meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav 36:865–891
Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon K (2009) The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess 21:1–21
Harkins L, Beech AR (2007) A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment: risk, need, responsivity, and process issues. Aggress Violent Behav 12:615–627
Harris A, Phenix A, Hanson RK, Thornton D (2003) Static-99 coding rules revised ’ 2003. Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa
Helmus L (2009) Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates: exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples. Unveröffentlichte Masterarbeit, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Helmus L, Hanson RK, Thornton D (2009) Reporting Static-99 in light of new research on recidivism norms. Forum 21:38–45
Hunsley J (2003) Introduction to the special section on incremental validity and utility in clinical assessment. Psychol Assess 15:443–445
Hunsley J, Meyer GJ (2003) The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychol Assess 15:446–455
Lussier P, Deslauriers-Varin N, Râtel T (2010) A descriptive profile of high-risk sex offenders under intensive supervision in the province of British Columbia, Canada. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 54:71–91
Mann RE, Hanson RK, Thornton D (2010) Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sex Abuse 22:191–217
Mossman D (1994) Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. J Consult Clin Psychol 62:783–792
Muche R, Ring C, Ziegler C (2005) Entwicklung und Validierung von Prognosemodellen auf Basis der logistischen Regression. Shaker, Aachen
Nedopil N (2005) Prognosen in der Forensischen Psychiatrie. Ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Pabst, Lengerich
Olver ME, Wong SC, Nicholaichuk T, Gordon A (2007) The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychol Assess 19:318–329
Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier C (2006) Violent offenders: appraising and managing risk. American Psychological Association, Washington
Rehder U, Suhling S (2008) Rückfälligkeit haftentlassener Sexualstraftäter. Monatsschr Kriminol 91:250–268
Rettenberger M, Eher R (2006) Die deutsche Übersetzung des Static-99 zur aktuarischen Kriminalprognose verurteilter Sexualstraftäter. Monatsschr Kriminol 89:352–365
Rettenberger M, Gaunersdorfer K, Schilling F, Eher R (2009) Die Vorhersage der Rückfälligkeit entlassener Sexualstraftäter mittels des Sexual Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) und dessen Screening Version (SORAG-SV). Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 3:318–328
Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer DP, Eher R (2010) Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 53:169–186
Rice ME, Harris GT (1995) Violent recidivism: assessing predictive validity. J Consult Clin Psychol 63:737–748
Rice ME, Harris GT (2005) Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law Hum Behav 29:615–620
Seto MC (2005) Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychol Assess 17:156–167
Stadtland C, Hollweg M, Kleindienst N, Dietl J, Reich U, Nedopil N (2005) Risk assessment and prediction of violent and sexual recidivism in sex offenders: long-term predictive validity of four risk assessment instruments. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 16:92–108