Did Okun’s law die after the Great Recession?

Business Economics - Tập 52 - Trang 216-226 - 2017
Giorgio Canarella1,2, Stephen M. Miller1,2
1Department of Economics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
2Center for Business and Economic Research, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA

Tóm tắt

This paper estimates Okun’s law, focusing on piecewise non-linearity in the form of structural breaks and threshold dynamics, and obtains regime-dependent as well as threshold-dependent changes in the unemployment rate. We employ an autoregressive distributed lag version of Okun’s law in first differences, which allows for delayed reactions of the unemployment rate to output growth. Applied to U.S. data over 1949Q1–2015Q4, the empirical analysis characterizes Okun’s law as a three-regime relationship with the first structural break coinciding with the 1973 oil price shock, and the second structural break immediately following the end of the Great Recession. We find support for threshold dynamics in each regime, which suggests that Okun’s law follows complex non-linear dynamics. Okun’s law, as a linear and constant “rule of thumb,” breaks down in each of the three regimes. In each regime, the unemployment rate responds asymmetrically to changes in output. In sum, Okun’s law died during the Great Recession. Only time will tell whether resurrection is feasible.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdel-Raouf, Fatma. 2014. On the Stability of Okun’s Law: Evidence from the Great Recession of 2007–2009. Journal of Business and Economic Studies 20 (1): 75–95. Bai, Jushan, and Pierre Perron. 1998. Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes. Econometrica 66 (1): 47–78. Bai, Jushan, and Pierre Perron. 2003. Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18 (1): 1–22. Ball, Laurence M., Daniel Leigh and Prakash Loungani. 2013. Okun’s Law: Fit and Fifty? NBER Working Paper No. 18668. Barro, J.Robert. 1988. The Persistence of Unemployment. American Economic Review 78 (2): 32–37. Blanchard, Olivier J., and Lawrence H. Summers. 1987. Hysteresis in Unemployment. European Economic Review 31 (1/2): 288–295. Chinn, Menzie, Laurent Ferrara, and Valérie Mignon. 2014. Explaining US Employment Growth after the Great Recession: The Role of Output-Employment Non-Linearities. Journal of Macroeconomics 42 (December): 118–129. Crespo-Cuaresma, Jesús. 2003. Okun’s Law Revisited. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65 (4): 439–451. Evans, George W. 1989. Output and Unemployment Dynamics in the United States: 1950–1985. Journal of Applied Econometrics 4 (3): 213–237. Gordon, Robert J. 1984. Unemployment and Potential Output in the 1980s. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 537–564. Harris, Richard, and Brian Silverstone. 2001. Testing for Asymmetry in Okun’s Law: A Cross-Country Comparison. Economics Bulletin 5 (2): 1–13. Holmes, Mark J., and Brian Silverstone. 2006. Okun’s Law, Asymmetries and Jobless Recoveries in the United States: A Markov-Switching Approach. Economics Letters 92 (2): 293–299. Knotek II, Edward S. 2007. How Useful Is Okun’s Law? Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 92 (4): 73–103. Lang, Dany, and Christian de Peretti. 2009. A Strong Hysteretic Model of Okun’s Law: Theory and a Preliminary Investigation. International Review of Applied Economics 23 (4): 445–462. Lee, Jim. 2000. The Robustness of Okun’s Law: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Macroeconomics 22 (2): 331–356. León-Ledesma, Miguel A. 2002. Unemployment Hysteresis in the US States and the EU: A Panel Approach. Bulletin of Economic Research 54 (2): 95–103. Lundbergh, Stefan, Timo Terasvirta, and Dick van Dijk. 2003. Time-Varying Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21 (1): 104–121. Moosa, Imad A. 1997. A Cross-Country Comparison of Okun’s Coefficient. Journal of Comparative Economics 24 (3): 335–356. Mortensen, Dale T., and Christopher A. Pissarides. 1994. Job Creation and Job Destruction in the theory of Unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61 (3): 397–415. Newey, Whithey K., and Kenneth D. West. 1987. Hypothesis Testing with Efficient Method of Moments Estimation. International Economic Review 28 (3): 777–787. Okun, Arthur M. 1962. Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 98-104. Österholm, Pär. 2016. Time Variation in Okun’s Law in Sweden. Applied Economics Letters 23 (6): 436–439. Owyang, Michael T., and Tatevik Sekhposyan. 2012. Okun’s Law over the Business Cycle: Was the Great Recession All that Different? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 94 (5): 399–418. Prachowny, Martin F.J. 1993. Okun’s Law: Theoretical Foundations and Revised Estimates. The Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (2): 331–336. Silvapulle, Paramsothy, Imad A. Moosa, and Mervyn J. Silvapulle. 2004. Asymmetry in Okun’s Law. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique 37 (2): 353–374. Sögner, Leopold, and Alfred Stiassny. 2002. An Analysis on the Structural Stability of Okun’s Law–A Cross-Country Study. Applied Economics 34 (14): 1775–1787. Tong, Howell. 1983. Threshold Models in Non-Linear Time Series Analysis. Lecture Notes in Statistics, 21, New York: Springer. Tong, Howell. 1990. Non-Linear Time Series: A Dynamical System Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Valadkhani, Abbas, and Russell Smyth. 2015. Switching and Asymmetric Behaviour of the Okun Coefficient in the US: Evidence for the 1948–2015 Period. Economic Modelling 50 (November): 281–290. Virèn, Matti. 2001. The Okun Curve Is Non-Linear. Economics Letters 70 (2): 253–257. Weber, Christian E. 1995. Cyclical Output, Cyclical Unemployment and Okun’s Coefficient: A New Approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 10 (4): 433–445.