Kim cương không phải là vĩnh cửu: Adam Smith và Carl Menger về giá trị và vị thế tương đối

Álvarez, A., & Hurtado, J. (2015). ’Out of sight, out of mind’: Social interactions and Smith’s asymmetrical sympathy. Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2, 1–20. Becchio, G. (2014). Social needs, social goods, and human associations in the second edition of Carl Menger’s principles. History of Political Economy, 46, 247–264. Bee, M., & Sternick, I. (2022). Without any need: Adam Smith’s Critique of Pufendorf’s Socialitatem. Presented at the History of Economic Thought meeting in Minneapolis on June 18th, 2022. Cowen, T. (2021). The NFT craze actually does make sense, Bloomberg, March 17, 2021. Dekker, E. (2021). The new theory of individual and collective needs in the second edition of Carl Menger’s. In L. Fiorito, S. Scheall, & C. E. Suprinyak (Eds.), Research in the history of economic thought and methodology: Including a symposium on Carl Menger at the centenary of his death. Emerald Publishing Limited. Dekker, E., & Kolev, S. (2016). Introduction to the ‘Social theories of classical political economy and modern economic policy. Econ Journal Watch, 13, 467–472. Galiani, F. (1751). On money : a translation of Della moneta. Dept. of Economics, University of Chicago, University Microfilms International. Garrido, J. de la C. (2021). The psychology of social recognition by Adam Smith. In. https://www.academia.edu/59540309/_The_Psychology_of_Social_Recognition_by_Adam_Smith Hayek, F., (1934). Carl Menger. In: Hayek, F. A. (ed.) The Collected Works of Carl Menger, vol. 1. Reprinted as volume 17 of Series of Reprints of Scarce Tracts in Economics and Political Science. London School of Economics and Political Science. Henry, J. (2000). Adam Smith and the theory of value: Chapter six considered. History of Economics Review, 31, 1–13. Horwitz, S. (2001). From Smith to Menger to Hayek: Liberalism in the spontaneous order tradition. The Independent Review, 6, 81–97. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. (2021). Views on Adam Smith's labor theory of value. In.: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought/virtual-issues/views-on-adam-smith-s-labor-theory-of-value. Kaushil, S. (1973). The case of Adam Smith’s value analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 25, 60–71. Levy, D. M. (1995). A partial spectator in the wealth of nations: A robust utilitarianism. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2, 299–326. Meacci, F. (2021). Carl Menger between Adam Smith and Eugen Von Bohm-Bawerk on the Theory of Value and Capital. In. Menger, C. ([1871] 2007). Principles of economics, foreword by P. G. Klein, introduction by F.A. Hayek, translated by J. Ding wall and B. F. Hoselltz. Ludwig von Mises Institute. ____. ([1891] 2016). The social theories of classical political economy and modern economic policy (E. Dekker & S. Kolev, trans.), Econ Journal Watch, 13: 473–89. Nicholas, M. (2010). Philanthropy becoming new status symbol for wealthy. Business News, August 11. O’Donnell, R. (1990). Adam Smith’s theory of value and distribution. A reappraisal. Palgrave Macmillan. Paganelli, M. P. (2009). Approbation and the desire to better one’s condition in Adam Smith : When the desire to better one’s condition does not better one’s condition and society’s condition. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31, 79–92. Pignol, C., & Walraevens, B. (2017). Smith and Rousseau on envy in commercial societies. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24(6), 1214–1246. Ricardo, D. ([1817] 2004). On the principles of political economy and taxation. Liberty Fund. Rothbard, M. (1995). Economic thought before Adam Smith. Vermont. Schliesser, E. (2013). The piacular, or on seeing oneself as a moral cause in Adam Smith. In M. Waldow & A. Lenz (Eds.), Contemporary perspective in early modern philosophy. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer. Schneider, M. (2007). The nature, history and significance of the concept of positional goods. History of Economics Review, 45, 60–81. Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of economic analysis; edited from manuscript by Elizabeth Boody Schumpeter. New York. Smith, A. (1985). Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Liberty Fund. ____. ([1759] 1982). The theory of moral sentiments. Liberty Classics. ____. ([1762-3; 1766] 1978) Lectures on jurisprudence. Liberty Fund. ____. ([1776] 1981). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Liberty Classics. Smith, C. (2013). Adam Smith’s “Collateral” inquiry: Fashion and morality in the theory of moral sentiments and the wealth of nations. History of Political Economy, 45, 505–522. ____. (2016). All in the best possible taste: Adam Smith and the leaders of fashion. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23, 597–610. Smith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2019). Humanomics: Moral sentiments and wealth of nations for the twenty-first century. New York. Streissler, E. W., & Streissler, M. (Eds.) (1994). Carl Menger’s Lectures to Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria, Translated by M. Streissler and D. F. Good. Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. Streissler, E. (1972). To what extent was the Austrian school marginalistas? History of Political Economy, 4(2), 426–441. Wagner, R. E. (2014). Entangled political economy: A keynote address. In R. Koppl & S. Horwitz (Eds.), Entangled political economy. Bingley. Yagi, K. (2011). Austrian and German economic thought: From subjectivism to social evolution. Taylor & Francis. Yamamori, T. (2017). The concept of need in Adam Smith. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41, 327–347. ____. (2020). The intersubjective ontology of need in Carl Menger. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, 1093–1113.