Diagnostic utility of median nerve CSA to ulnar nerve CSA ratio in the diagnosis of mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

Amany S. El-Bahnasawy1, Mohammad Kamal Senna, Amr E. Okasha1, Ola Mohammad Gharbia2
1Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
2Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Ultrasonography (US) measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area (m-CSA) at pisiform is increasingly utilized in identification of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), but there is still no agreement about the ideal cut-off value to employ. The aim of the study was to explore whether the median CSA to ulnar CSA ratio at the level of pisiform may yield a more accurate diagnosis of CTS. The study included 50 patients with mild idiopathic CTS (ICTS), assessed clinically and by nerve conduction studies, and 50 matched controls. M-CSA, median nerve flattening ratio and swelling ratio (m-SR), palmer bowing, and median CSA to ulnar CSA ratio (m-CAS:u-CSA) were measured for patients and controls. The cutoff values for the US parameters for the diagnosis of ICTS were evaluated. Results Compared to the control group, the ICTS group had significantly higher m-CSA (p < 0.001), higher m-CSA:u-CSA ratio (p < 0.001), higher m-SR (p = 0.012, and higher palmar bowing (p < 0.001). Use of m-CSA cutoff value of 11.78 mm2 and CSA:u-CSA ratio cut-off point of 2.97 yielded the greatest sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ICTS. Conclusion The m-CSA:u-CSA ratio is slightly superior to the m-CSA in the diagnosis of CTS in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I (1999) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 282(2):153–158

MacDermid JC, Doherty T (2004 Oct) Clinical and electro diagnostic testing of carpal tunnel syndrome: a narrative review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 34(10):565–588

Werner RA, Andary M (2011 Oct) Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 44(4):597–607

Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, Maupin K, Andary M, Amadio PC et al (2009) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91:2478–2479

Mhoon JT, Juel VC, Hobson-Webb LD (2012 Dec) Median nerve ultrasound as a screening tool in carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation of cross-sectional area measures with electrodiagnostic abnormality. Muscle Nerve. 46(6):871–884

Kuo TT, Lee MR, Liao YY, Chen JP, Hsu YW, Yeh CK (2016 Jan 14) Assessment of median nerve mobility by ultrasound dynamic imaging for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. PLoS One. 11(1):e0147051

Visser LH, Smidt MH, Lee ML (2008) High resolution sonography versus EMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 79:63–67

Fu T, Cao M, Liu F, Zhu J, Ye D, Feng X, Xu Y, Wang G, Bai Y (2015 Jan 24) Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with ultrasonography: value of inlet-to-outlet median nerve area ratio in patients versus healthy volunteers. PLoS One. 10(1):e0116777

Wong SM, Grifth JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS (2002) Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 46:1914–1921

Beekman R, Visser LH (2003) Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve. 27:26–33

Ozben S, Acar H, Gunaydin S, Genc F, Ozer F, Ozben H (2012 Jun) The second lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol. 29(3):263–267

Basiri K, Katirji B (2015 Feb 17) Practical approach to electrodiagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. Adv Biomed Res. 4:50

Hobson-Webb LD, Massey JM, Juel VC, Sanders DB (2008) The ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 119:1353–1357

Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ et al (2002) Practice parameter: electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 58:1589–1592

Buchberger W, Schön G, Strasser K, Jungwirth W (1991) High-resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. J Ultrasound Med. 10:531–537

Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C (1992) Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 159:793–798

Ulaşli AM, Duymuş M, Nacir B, Rana Erdem H, Koşar U (2013) Reasons for using swelling ratio in sonographic diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and a reliable method for its calculation. Muscle Nerve. 47:396–402

Yurdakul OV, Mesci N, Çetinkaya Y, Geler KD (2016) Diagnostic significance of ultrasonographic measurements and median-ulnar ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation with nerve conduction studies. J Clin Neurol. 12:289–294

Jiwa N, Abraham A, Bril V, Katzberg HD, Lovblom LE, Barnett C, Breiner A (2018 Nov) The median to ulnar cross-sectional surface area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 129(11):2239–2244

Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Smith BP, Rushing J, Walker FO (2006) The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 31:726–732

McDonagh C, Alexander M, Kane D (2015) The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a new paradigm. Rheumatology (Oxford). 54:9–19

Tagliafco A, Bignotti B (2015) New parameters for evaluating peripheral nerve disorders on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 34:1523

Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, Caliandro P, Hobson-Webb LD (2016) Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 15:1273–1284

Tagliafico AS (2016) Peripheral nerve imaging: not only cross- sectional area. World J Radiol. 8:726–728

Atan T, Günendi Z (2018 Feb 23) Diagnostic utility of the sonographic median to ulnar nerve cross-sectional area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Turk J Med Sci. 48(1):110–116

Won SJ, Kim BJ, Park KS, Yoon JS, Choi H (2013) Reference values for nerve ultrasonography in the upper extremity. Muscle Nerve. 47:864–871

Bathala L, Kumar P, Kumar K, Shaik A, Visser LH (2014) Normal values of median nerve cross-sectional area obtained by ultrasound along its course in the arm with electro-physiological correlations, in 100 Asian subjects. Muscle Nerve. 49:284–286

Qrimli M, Ebadi H, Breiner A, Siddiqui H, Alabdali M, Abraham A, Lovblom LE, Perkins BA, Bril V (2016) Reference values for ultrasonography of peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve. 53:538–544

Mohamed FI, Kamel SR, Hafez AE (2018) Usefulness of neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 45:65–73

Kwon HK, Kang HJ, Byun CW, Yoon JS, Kang CH, Pyun SB (2014) Correlation between ultrasonography findings and electrodiagnostic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome: 3D ultrasonography. J Clin Neurol. 10(4):348–353

Lee CH, Kim TK, Yoon ES, Dhong ES (2005) Correlation of high-resolution ultrasonographic findings with the clinical symptoms and electrodiagnostic data in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg. 54:20–23

Eom YI, Choi MH, Kim YK, Joo IS (2015) Sonographic findings in the ulnar nerve according to the electrophysiologic stage of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. 34:1027–1034