Diagnostic and therapeutic cold knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Soutter WP, Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A, et al. Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 1997; 349: 978–980.

Sankaranarayanan R, Keshkar V, Kothari A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia in rural India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 104: 95–99.

Krebs HB, Pastore L, Helmkamp BF. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical dysplasia: experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 196: 289–295.

Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 54: 175–179.

Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG, et al. Combined colposcopy, loop conization, and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 78: 47–51.

Fadare O, Cardoza-Favarato G. Significance of disease extent in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Ann Diagn Pathol 2008; 12: 17–20.

Ueda M, Ueki K, Kanemura M, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101: 143–146.

Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporation, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 737–744.

Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edwards RP, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 52: 175–179.

Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, et al. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 106: 214–218.

Phelps JY, Ward JA, Szigeti J, et al. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post cone hysterectomy specimens. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 128–130.

Cardoza-Favarato G, Fadare O. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 781–786.

Reich O, Pickel H, Lahousen M, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after coldknife conization with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 91: 428–340.

Reich O, Lahousen M, Pickel H, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow up after coldknife conization with involved margins. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 193–196.

Costa S, De Nuzzo M, Infante FE, et al. Disease persistence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 85: 119–124.

Mohamed-Noor K, Quinn MA, Tan J. Outcomes after cervical cold knife conization with complete and incomplete excision of abnormal epithelium: a review of 699 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 67: 34–38.

Ueda M, Ueki K, Kanemura M, et al. Conservative excisional laser conization for early invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 231–234.

Park JY, Lee SM, Yoo CW, et al. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107: 39–44.

Murdoch JB, Morgen PR, Lopes A, et al. Histological incomplete excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow up, not retreatment. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 99: 990–993.

Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993; 12: 186–192.

Matsuura Y, Kawageo T, Yoki N, et al. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 24l–246.

Costa S, Nuzzo MD, Rubino A, et al. Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90: 57–63.

Srisomboon J, Tangchaitrong CA, Bhusawang Y, et al. Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. J Med Asso Thai 1996; 79: 423–428.

Luesley DM, Mccrum A, Terry PB, et al. Complications of cone biopsy related to the dimensions of the cone and the influence of prior colposcopic assessment. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 92: 158–164.

Jones HW. Cone biopsy and hysterectomy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Bailliere’s Clin Obstet Gynecol 1995; 9: 221–236.

Mazouni C, Porcu G, Haddad OC, et al. Conservative treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using a cold-knife section technique. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 121: 86–93.

Luesley DM, Redman CWE, Buxton EJ, et al. Prevention of post-cone biopsy cervical stenosis using temporary cervical stents. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 97: 334–337.

Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, et al. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 933–938.

Lü WG, Shen YM, Ye F, et al. The accuracy of diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with colposcopically directed biopsy. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi 2006; 86: 303–306 (Chinese).

Itsukaichi M, Kurata H, Matsushita M, et al. Stage Ia1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma: conservative management after laser conization with positive margins. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90: 387–389.