Diagnostic accuracy of various modalities relative to open bone biopsy for detection of long bone posttraumatic osteomyelitis

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 27 - Trang 871-875 - 2017
Vivek Chadayammuri1, Benoit Herbert1, Jiandong Hao1, Andreas Mavrogenis2, Juan C. Quispe1, Ji Wan Kim3, Heather Young4, Mark Hake1, Cyril Mauffrey1
1Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
2First Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea
4Division of Infectious Disease, Denver Health Medical Center, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, USA

Tóm tắt

Long bone posttraumatic osteomyelitis (PTOM) is a relatively common complication following surgical fixation of open fractures. There is a lacking consensus on ideal strategies for diagnostic evaluation of long bone PTOM. While open bone biopsy and culture is considered the ‘gold diagnostic standard,’ its cost and invasiveness are often prohibitive and have prompted the search for alternate diagnostic methods. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic modalities relative to open bone biopsy and culture for the detection of long bone PTOM. Retrospective cohort study; Level of Evidence, III. Urban Level I trauma center and safety-net institution. A consecutive cohort of 159 adult patients presenting with long bone PTOM at our Level I trauma center between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013, were retrospectively identified. All included patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for PTOM (as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention) that involved a long bone (femur, fibula, tibia, humerus, radius, and ulna). Patients with diabetic foot infection, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis of the spine/pelvis/hand, or insufficient medical records were excluded. Sensitivity and specificity of deep wound culture, soft tissue histopathologic examination, and elevated levels of acute phase reactants [C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and leukocyte count (WBC)] were determined using findings of open bone biopsy and culture as a reference standard. The most common pathogen isolated on open bone culture was staphylococci, contributing to 89 (57%) of 159 cases of long bone PTOM (p < 0.001). Relative to open bone biopsy and culture as the gold diagnostic standard, soft tissue histopathology demonstrated a sensitivity of 69.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53.7–82.3%] and specificity of 38.9% (95% CI 18.3–63.9%) for the detection of long bone PTOM. Deep wound culture exhibited a lower sensitivity of 66.0% (95% CI 56.1–74.8%) and specificity of 28.1% (95% CI 12.9–49.5%), a difference that was statistically significant (p = 0.021). Among inflammatory markers, elevated levels of CRP and ESR were equally sensitive for the detection of PTOM compared to open bone biopsy and culture, while WBC was significantly less sensitive (sensitivity 33.2%; 95% CI 25.3–43.7; p < 0.001). Soft tissue histopathologic examination and deep wound culture are relatively poor substitutes for the diagnosis of long bone PTOM compared to open bone biopsy and culture. The accurate identification of causative pathogens underlying long bone PTOM is critical for diagnosis and choice of antibiotic treatment. Future studies investigating the use of higher-resolution diagnostic methods are merited.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Patzakis MJ, Zalavras CG (2005) Chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis and infected nonunion of the tibia: current management concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:417–427 Zalavras CG, Christensen T, Rigopoulos N et al (2009) Infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1715–1720 Calhoun JH, Manring MM, Shirtliff M (2009) Osteomyelitis of the long bones. Semin Plast Surg 23:59–72 Ikpeme IA, Ngim NE, Ikpeme AA (2010) Diagnosis and treatment of pyogenic bone infections. Afr Health Sci 10:82–88 Sanders J, Mauffrey C (2013) Long bone osteomyelitis in adults: fundamental concepts and current techniques. Orthopedics 36:368–375 Sanders JO, Bozic KJ, Glassman SD et al (2014) Clinical practice guidelines: their use, misuse, and future directions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22:135–144 Palmer MP, Altman DT, Altman GT et al (2014) Can we trust open culture results in nonunions? J Orthop Trauma 28:384–390 Hake ME, Oh JK, Kim JW et al (2015) Difficulties and challenges to diagnose and treat post-traumatic long bone osteomyelitis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:1–3 Fritz JM, McDonald JR (2008) Osteomyelitis: approach to diagnosis and treatment. Phys Sportsmed 36:nihpa116823 Wilson ML, Winn W (2008) Laboratory diagnosis of bone, joint, soft-tissue, and skin infections. Clin Infect Dis 46:453–457 Maharajan K, Patro DK, Menon J et al (2013) Serum Procalcitonin is a sensitive and specific marker in the diagnosis of septic arthritis and acute osteomyelitis. J Orthop Surg Res 8:19 Michail M, Jude E, Liaskos C et al (2013) The performance of serum inflammatory markers for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with osteomyelitis. Int J Lower extrem Wounds 12:94–99 Unkila-Kallio L, Kallio MJ, Peltola H (1994) The usefulness of C-reactive protein levels in the identification of concurrent septic arthritis in children who have acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. A comparison with the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the white blood-cell count. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:848–853 Harris JC, Caesar DH, Davison C et al (2011) How useful are laboratory investigations in the emergency department evaluation of possible osteomyelitis? Emerg Med Australas 23:317–330 Khatri G, Wagner DK, Sohnle PG (2001) Effect of bone biopsy in guiding antimicrobial therapy for osteomyelitis complicating open wounds. Am J Med Sci 321:367–371 Lewis RP, Sutter VL, Finegold SM (1978) Bone infections involving anaerobic bacteria. Medicine 57:279–305