Diagnóstico prenatal y array-hibridación genómica comparada (CGH) (I). Gestaciones de elevado riesgo

Bejjani, 2005, Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?, Am J Med Genet A, 134, 259, 10.1002/ajmg.a.30621 Emanuel, 2007, From microscopes to microarrays: dissecting recurrent chromosomal rearrangements, Nat Rev Genet, 8, 869, 10.1038/nrg2136 Shaffer, 2007, Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis, Am J Med Genet, 145C, 87, 10.1002/ajmg.c.30114 Ballif, 2006, Detection of low-level mosaicism by arrayCGH in routine diagnostic specimens, Am J of Med Genetics part A, 140A, 2757, 10.1002/ajmg.a.31539 Menten, 2009, Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples, BMC Med Genet, 10, 89, 10.1186/1471-2350-10-89 Xiang, 2008, Analytical and clinical validity of whole-genome oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for pediatric patients with mental retardation and developmental delay, Am J Med Genet A, 146A, 1942, 10.1002/ajmg.a.32411 Scott, 2010, Large inverted repeats within Xp11.2 are present at the breakpoints of isodicentric X chromosomes in Turner syndrome, Hum Mol Genet, 19, 3383, 10.1093/hmg/ddq250 Cheung, 2007, Microarray-based CGH detects chromosomal mosaicism not revealed by conventional cytogenetics, Am J Med Genet A, 143A, 1679, 10.1002/ajmg.a.31740 Ballif, 2007, Development of a high-density pericentromeric region BAC clone set for the detection and characterization of small supernumerary marker chromosomes by array CGH, Genet Med, 9, 150, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3180312087 Stankiewicz, 2007, Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation, Curr Opin Genet Dev, 17, 182, 10.1016/j.gde.2007.04.009 Armengol, 2011, Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in invasive prenatal diagnosis, Hum Genet Hillman, 2011, Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 37, 6, 10.1002/uog.7754 Brady, 2012, Array-based approaches in prenatal diagnosis, Methods Mol Biol, 838, 151, 10.1007/978-1-61779-507-7_7 Strassberg, 2011, Copy-numberchanges in prenatal diagnosis, Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 11, 579, 10.1586/erm.11.43 Vissers, 2003, Array-bases comparative genomic hybridization for the genomewide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities», Am J Hum Genet, 73, 1261, 10.1086/379977 Miller, 2010, Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies, Am J Hum Genet, 86, 749, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006 Regier, 2010, Value for money? Array genomic hybridization for diagnostic testing for genetic causes of intellectual disability, Am J Hum Genet, 86, 765, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.009 2009, Array comparativegenomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis, Obstet Gynecol, 114, 1161, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33cad Le Caignec, 2005, Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations, J Med Genet, 42, 121, 10.1136/jmg.2004.025478 Rickman, 2006, Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH, J Med Genet, 43, 353, 10.1136/jmg.2005.037648 Sahoo, 2006, Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization, Genet Med, 8, 719, 10.1097/01.gim.0000245576.47154.63 Shaffer, 2008, Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens, Prenat Diagn, 28, 789, 10.1002/pd.2053 Coppinger, 2009, Shaffer LGWhole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray, Prenat Diagn, 29, 1156, 10.1002/pd.2371 Van den Veyver, 2009, Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases, Prenat Diagn, 29, 29, 10.1002/pd.2127 Maya, 2010, Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) in a prenatal setting, Prenat Diagn, 30, 1131, 10.1002/pd.2626 D’Amours, 2012, Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype, Clin Genet, 81, 128, 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01687.x Fiorentino, 2011, Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases, Prenat Diagn, 31, 1270, 10.1002/pd.2884 Schaeffer, 2004, Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages, Am J Hum Genet, 74, 1168, 10.1086/421250 Bi, 2008, Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH, Prenat Diagn, 28, 943, 10.1002/pd.2087 Evangelidou, 2010, Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations, Mol CytogenetV 3, 24, 10.1186/1755-8166-3-24 Tyreman, 2009, High resolution array analysis: diagnosing pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings, J Med Genet, 46, 531, 10.1136/jmg.2008.065482 Vialard, 2009, Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience, Fetal Diagn Ther, 25, 277, 10.1159/000224112 Kleeman, 2009, Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype, Prenat Diagn, 29, 1213, 10.1002/pd.2367 Valduga, 2010, A retrospective study by oligonucleotide array-CGH analysis in 50 fetuses with multiple malformations, Prenat Diagn, 30, 333, 10.1002/pd.2460 Park SJ, Jung EH, Ryu RS, Kang HW, Ko JM, Kim HJ, et al. Clinical implementation of whole-genome array CGH as a first-tier test in 5080 pre and postnatal cases. Mol Cytogenet. 2011;4:12. Vallespin E, Palomares, Mori MA, Martín R, García-Miñaur S, Fernández L et al. Customized High Resolution CGH-array for Clinical Diagnosis Reveal Additional Genomic Imbalances in Previous Well-defined Pathological Samples. Am J Med Genet part A, en revisión (AJMG MS-11-0551). Vermeesch, 2007, Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis, Eur J Hum Genet, 15, 1105, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.06.012 Palomares, 2011, Characterization of a 8q21.11 microdeletion syndrome associated with intellectual disability and a recognizable phenotype, Am J Hum Genet, 89, 295, 10.3928/00904481-20090723-08 Shaffer, 2009, Using microarray-based molecular cytogenetic methods to identify chromosome abnormalities, Pediatr Ann, 38, 440, 10.3928/00904481-20090723-08 Li, 2011, Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, Am J Med Genet A, 155A, 1605, 10.1016/j.diapre.2011.07.002 Comas-Gabriel, 2011, 10 años de experiencia en diagnóstico prenatal invasivo en el Instituto Dexeus, Diag Prenat, 22, 117, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318148b976 Pergament, 2007, Controversies and challenges of array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal genetic diagnosis, Genet Med, 9, 596, 10.1002/pd.2129 Friedman, 2009, High-resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis, Prenat Diagn, 29, 20, 10.1002/pd.2722 Bui, 2011, Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era?, Prenat Diagn, 31, 235, 10.1136/jmg.2007.052787 De Gregori, 2007, Cryptic deletions are a common finding in «balanced» reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: A study of 59 patients, J Med Genet, 44, 750, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.02.012 Baptista, 2008, Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: Comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort, Am J Hum Genet, 82, 927, 10.1136/bmj.c7401 Chiu, 2011, Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study, BMJ (Clin Res ed), 342, c7401, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f1ddb Darilek, 2008, Pre- and postnatal genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization: genetic counseling perspectives, Genet Med, 10, 13, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f1ddb