Developments in the Debate on Nanoethics: Traditional Approaches and the Need for New Kinds of Analysis

Allhoff F (2007) On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics. In: Nanoethics 1(3): 185–210 Allhoff F, Lin P (2006) What’s so special about nanotechnology and nanoethics? Introductory paper to nanoethics symposium published in. Int J Appl Philos 20(2):179–190 Allhoff F, Lin P (2008) Nanotechnology and society. Current and emerging ethical issues. Springer, Dordrecht Bachmann G (1998) Innovationsschub aus dem Nanokosmos. Technologieanalyse. VDI- Technologiezentrum, Düsseldorf Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (2004) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam Ball P (2003) Nanoethics and the purpose of new technologies. Talk delivered at “Material Choices” Symposium, Royal Society For Arts, London, March 2003 Barnett J, Carr A, Clift R (2006) Going public: risk, trust and public understanding of nanotechnologies. In: Hunt G, Mehta M (eds) Nanotechnology, risk and law. Earthscan, UK and USA, pp 196–212 Bensaude-Vincent B (2004) Two cultures of nanotechnology? In: HYLE 10, 2: 65–82 Bensaude-Vincent B (2006) Self-assembly, self-organization: A philosophical perspective on converging technologies. Paper prepared for France/Stanford Meeting in Avignon, December 2006, Draft. http://www.u-paris10.fr/servlet/com.univ.collaboratif.utils.LectureFichiergw Bensaude-Vincent B (2009) Les vertiges de la technoscience. Editions La Découverte, Paris Berne RW (2005) Nanoethics. In: Mitcham C (ed) Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics, vol. 3. Thomson-Gale, Detroit, pp 1259–1262 Berube D (2009) Public perception of nano—a summary of findings, 20 october 2009, http://nanohype.blogspot.com/ BIAC Expert Group on Nanotechnologies (2009) Responsible development of nanotechnology: turning vision into reality, BIAC expert group on nanotechnologies vision paper, http://www.biac.org/statements/nanotech/FIN09-01_Nanotechnology_Vision_Paper.pdf Bond P (2004) Vision for converging technologies and future society. In: Roco M, Montemagno C (eds) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1013: 17–24 Bostrom N (2007) Technological revolutions: ethics and policy in the dark. In: Cameron NM, Mitchell EM (eds) Nanoscale: issues and perspectives for the nano century. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 129–152 Bostrom N, Ord T (2006) The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics. In: Ethics 116: 656–679 Braithwaite V, Levi M (eds) (1998) Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation, New York Brown N, Rip A, van Lente H (2003) Expectation In and About Science and Technology: a background paper for the expectations workshop 13–14 June 2003, http://209.85.129.132/search?q=cache:o2RgVoVarFcJ:www.york.ac.uk/res/satsu/expectations/Utrecht%25202003/Background%2520paper%2520version%252014May03.pdf+nanotechnology+ideograph+rip&cd=3&hl=it&ct=clnk&gl=it Browne W R, Feringa WL (2006) Making molecular nanomachines work. In: Nature Nanotechnology 1(I1): 25–35 Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2004a) Nanotechnologie. Innovationen für die Welt von morgen. Bonifatius GmbH, Bonn Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2004b) Nanotechnologie erobert Märkte. Deutsche Zukunftsoffensive für Nanotechnologie. Bonifatius GmbH, Bonn Cameron NM (2007) Toward nanoethics? In: Cameron NM, Mitchell EM (eds) Nanoscale: issues and perspectives fort he nano century. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 281–294 Campbell P (2003) Nanotech, uncertainty and the publics, Talk at a symposium on nanotechnology at ZKM, the Art and Media Museum, Karlsruhe, Germany, June 13, 2003, http://www.euroscience.net/article1.html Cobb MD, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology. Risks, benefits, & trust. J Nano Res 6:395–405 Coenen C (2005) NanoEthics conference at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA, March 2–5, 2005. Conference Report.In: Technikfolgenabschätzung. Theorie und Praxis 2(14):116–120, http://www.itas.fzk.de/tatup/052/coen05a.htm Coenen C, Fleischer T, Rader M (2004) Of visions, dreams, and nightmares: the debate on converging technologies. Report on the Conference “Converging Technologies for a Diverse Europe”, Brussels September 14–15, 2004. In: Technikfolgenabschätzung—Theorie und Praxis, Nr. 3(13): 118–125; http://www.itas.fzk.de/tatup/043/coua04a.htm COMEST (2005) The precautionary principle. Report of the expert group on the precautionary principle commission on the ethics of scientific knowledge and technology. Geneva, Unesco Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique pour la Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé (CCNE) (2007) AVIS N°96—Questions éthiques posées par les nanosciences, les nanotechnologies et la santé, http://www.ccne-ethique.fr/francais/start.htm Commission de l’éthique la Science et de la technologie (2006) Éthique et Nanotechnologies : se donner les moyens d’agir, Québec—Nov. 2006, http://www.ethique.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ftp/Nano_Web_BD.pdf Commission de l’Éthique de la Science et de la Technologie (2008) Ethics, risk, and nanotechnology: responsible approaches to dealing with risk. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanotechnology and society. Current and emerging ethical issues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 75–89 Corley EA et al (2009) Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology. In: Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17 June 2009, http://www.springerlink.com/content/627323076677745q/fulltext.html Crandall BC (ed) (1996) Nanotechnology: molecular speculations on global abundance. MIT, Cambridge Davies S et al (2009) Reconfiguring responsiility: lessons for public policy (Part 1 of the report on deepening the debate on nanotechnology). Duhram University, Duhram Drexler E (1986) Engines of creation- the coming era of nanotechnology. Anchor Books, USA Dupont, Environmental Defense (2007) Nano risk framework. June 2007, http://www.edf.org/documents/6496_Nano%20Risk%20Framework.pdf Dupuy J-P (2000) The mechanization of mind: on the origins of cognitive science. Princeton University Press, Princeton Dupuy J-P (2002) Pour une catastrophisme eclairé. Editions du Seuil, France Dupuy J-P (2004a) Complexity and uncertainty: a prudential approach to nanotechnology. In: Sanco, European Commission (Community Health and Consumer Protection) (2004) Nanotechnologies: A Preliminary Risk Analysis on the Basis of a Workshop, Brussels, 1–2 March 2004: 71–93, (www.europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/documents/ev_20040301_en.pdf) Dupuy J-P (2004b) Do we shape technologies or do they shape us?, Proceedings of the Conference “Converging technologies for a diverse Europe”, September 2004, European Commission, Brussels. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/foresight/docs/ntw_22_dupuy_text.pdf Dupuy J-P (2007) Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32(3): 237–261 Dupuy J-P (2009) “Preface to the new edition”: the mechanization of mind: on the origins of cognitive science. Princeton, Princeton University Press Dupuy J-P, Grinbaum A (2004) Living with uncertainty: toward the ongoing normative. Assessment of Nanotechnology. In: Techné 8: 4–25 Ebbesen M, Andersen S, Besenbacher F (2006) Ethics in nanotechnology: starting from scratch? In Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 26: 451–462 EGE (2006) Nanomedicine. Nanotechnology for health. European technology platform, stretegy research agenda for nanomedicine, November 2006, Belgium: European Commission ETC Group (2003a) The big down: technologies converging at the nano-scale, www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/54/02/com8788specialpnanomar-jun05eng.pdf ETC (2003b) Size matters. The call for a global moratorium, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=165 ETC Group (2004) Down on the farm. The impact of nano-scale technologies on food and agriculture, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=80 ETC Group (2005) Nanotech’s “Second Nature” patents: implications for the global south, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=53 ETC Group (2007) Broad international coalition issues urgent call for strong oversight of nanotechnology. press release, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/issues/nanotechnology.html European Commission (2004) Towards a European strategy for nanotechnology, communication from the Commission. Brussels, European Communities, Report. European Commission, Brussels, ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nano_com_en.pdf European Commission (2008) A code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research, A Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008; http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/index_en.html (last accessed 05/28/09) Felt U et al (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously, Directorate General for Research, European Commission. http://cps.fns.uniba.sk/veda/files/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf Ferrari A (2008) Is it all about human nature? The ethical challenges of converging technologies beyond a polarized debate. In: Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research 1(21): 1–24 Ferrari A (2009a) Controlling the ethics of nanorisks. In: Arnaldi S, Lorenzet A, Russo F (eds) Managing the uncertainty of nanotechnology: ethics, policy and public engagement. IOS, Amsterdam Ferrari A (2009b) The Nano-control freak: multi-faceted strategies for taming nature. In: Kjolberg K, Wickson F (eds) Nano goes Macro—Social Perspectives on Nano-scaled Sciences & Technologies, Pan Stanford (in press) Ferrari A (2010) Visions of a better world in nanotechnologies. In: Ferrari A, Gammel S (eds) Visionen der nanotechnologie. AKA Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 203–227 Ferrari A, Nordmann A (2009) Reconfiguring responsibility: lessons for nanoethics (Part 2 of the report on deepening the debate on nanotechnology). Duhram University, Duhram Foladori G, Invernizzi N (2005) Nanotechnology in its socio-economic context. In: Science Studies 18, 2: 67–73 Foladori G, Invernizzi N (2006) Nanotecnologías disruptivas. Implicaciones sociales de las nanotecnologías. Miguel Ángel Porrúa and Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas Foladori G, Invernizzi N (2008) The workers’ push to democratize nanotechnology. In: Fisher E et al (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnology in society 1: 23–36 (originally posted at estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/relans/documentos/UITA-English-1.pdf Friends of the Earth (2007) Nanotechnology policy statement. http://nano.foe.org.au/filestore2/download/94/FoEA%20Nanotechnology%20Policy%20May%202006.pdf Fukuyama F (2002) Our posthuman future. The consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Profile Books, Chicago Gavelin K, Wilson R, Doubleday R (2007) Democratic technologies? Final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG), Involve, London, http://www.involve.org.uk/assets/Publications/Democratic-Technologies.pdf Goodsell DS (2004) Bionanotechnology: lessons from nature. Wiley-Liss Inc, Hoboken Gordijn B (2006) Nanoethik—eine Neufassung der Debatte. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 311–323 Gordon R (2007) Reasoning about the future of nanotechnology. In: Cameron NM, Ellen MM (eds) Nanoscale. Issues and perspectives for the nanocentury. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 97–114 Gould KA (2005) Small, not beautiful: nanotechnology and the treadmill of production. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 12, 2005, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p18495_index.html Gould KA, Pellow DN, Schnaiberg A (2003) Interrogating the treadmill of production: everything you wanted to know about the treadmill, but were afraid to ask. Revised paper from Madison Symposium on the Treadmill of Production, http://www.northwestern.edu/ipr/publications/papers/2004/schnaiberg/21_InterrogatingTreadmill.pdf Greenpeace (2007) Nanotechnology policy and position paper, http://www.greenpeace.org/denmark/press/rapporter-og-dokumenter/nanotechnology-policy-positi Grunwald A (2004a) Vision assessment as a new element of technology future analysis tool-box. In: Proceedings of the EU-US Scientific Seminar: New Technology foresight, forecasting & assessment methods, Seville, May 13–14 2004 Grunwald A (2004b) Ethische Aspekte der Nanotechnologie. Eine Felderkundung, In: Technikfolgenabschätzung 2(13): 71–78 Grunwald A (2005) Nanotechnology—a new field of ethical enquiry? In: Science and Engineering Ethics 11, 2: 187–201 Grunwald A (2006) Nanotechnologie als Chiffre der Zukunft. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 49–80 Grunwald A (2008) Auf dem Weg in eine nanotechnologische Zukunft. Philosophisch- ethische Fragen. Freiburg I.B.: Karl Alber Harremoës P et al (2002) The precautionary principle in the 20th century: late lessons from early warnings. Earthscan, London Harris J (2007) Enhancing evolution? The ethical case for making better people. Princeton University Press, Princeton Harris J, Chan S (2006) Cognitive regeneration or enhancement: the ethical issues. In: Regenerative Medicine 1(3): 361–366 HLEG (2004) Converging technologies—shaping the future of European societies, a report to the European Commission Rappeurteur: Alfred Nordmann Holm S, Harris J (1999) Precautionary principle stifles discovery. In: Nature 400: 398 Hull G (2007) Normative aspects of a “Substantive” precautionary principle. In: Social Science and Research Network (SSRN) available at: SSRN_ID1013357_code861170.pdf Hullmann V (2008) European activities in the field of ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) and governance of nanotechnology, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/elsa_governance_nano.pdf Hunt G (2006) Nanotechnoscience and complex systems: the case for nanology. In: Hunt G, Mehta M (eds) Nanotechnology. Risks, ethics and law. Earthscan, UK and USA, pp 43–58 Invernizzi N, Foladori G, Maclurcan D (2008) Nanotechnology’s controversial role for the south. In: Science Technology Society 13: 123–148 IUF (IUF (International Union of Food, Agricultural Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Association) (2007) Resolution on nanotechnologies at the IUF Congress meeting in Geneva. March 19-22, 2007, http://www.iuf.org James HS, Marks LA (2008) Trust and distrust in biotechnology risk managers: Insights from the United Kingdom, 1996–2002. In: AgBioForum 11(2): 93–105, http://www.agbioforum.org/v11n2/v11n2a03-james.htm Janich P (2006) Wissenschaftstheorie der Nanotechnologie. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 1–32 Kaiser M (2009) Visionen der Öffentlichkeit als Elemente nanotechnologischer Identitätsarbeit In: Ferrari A, Gammel S. Visionen der Kearnes M (2009) Nanotechnology and the constitution of the social. In: Ferrari A, Gammel S. Visionen der Nanotechnologie. Heidelberg Aka Verlag: 187–201 Kearnes M, Rip A (2009) The emerging governance landscape of nanotechnology. In: Gammel S, Lösch A, Nordmann A (eds) Jenseits von Regulierung: Zum politischen Umgang mit der Nanotechnologie. Aka Verlag, Heidelberg Kearnes M et al (2006) Governing at the nanoscale: people, policies and emerging technologies. Demos, London Keiper A (2007) Nanoethics as a discipline? In: The new Atlantis. A Journal of Technology & Science: 55–67, http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/nanoethics-as-a-discipline Khushf G (2004) The ethics of nanotechnology. Vision and Values for a New Generation of Science and Engineering. In: National Academy of Engineering (ed.) Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering. Papers from a Workshop, October 14–15, 2003E. The National Academies Press; http://books.nap.edu/books/030909271X/html/29.html#pagetop Kjolberg K, Wickson F (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: mapping the early literature. In: Nanoethics 1: 89–104 Kurzweil R (2003) Testimony to the US house of representatives committee on science, full science, hearing on the societal implications of nanotechnology, April 9, 2003 http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/science/hearings/full03/apr09/kurzweil.pdf Lee R, Jose D (2008) Self-interest, self-restraint and corporate responsibility for nanotechnologies: emerging dilemmas for modern managers. Technol Anal Strat Manag 20(1):113–125 Macoubrie J (2005) Informed public perception of nano and trust in government. Chigago: Woodrow Wilson Center www.wilsoncenter.org/news/docs/macoubriereport.pdf Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning, and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15(2):221–241 Meyerson E, Sipfle MA, Sipfle D (1991) Explanation in the sciences. Springer, Boston Miller G (2008) Nanotechnology and the public interest: Repeating the mistakes of GM foods? In: International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 7(2–3): 274–280 Mnyusiwalla A, Daar AS, Singer PA (2003) Mind the gap. Science and ethics in nanotechnology. In: Nanotechnology 14: R9-R13 Moor J, Weckert J (2004) Nanoethics: assessing the nanoscale from an ethical point of view. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 301–310 NanoAction (2007) Principles for the oversight of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials, http://www.nanoaction.org/nanoaction/index.cfm NanoFraming (2009) FramingNano mapping study on regulation and governance of nanotechnologies, www.framingnano.eu National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (1995) The national academy press on being a scientist: responsible conduct in research, Second Edition National Research Council (2006) A matter of size. Triennial review of the national nanotechnology initiative National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) (1999) Shaping the world atom by atom, http://itri.loyola.edu/nano/IWGN.Public.Brochure National Science and Technology Council (NSCT) (2000) National nanotechnology initiative: The initiative and its implementation plan. Washington, DC National Science Foundation (NSF) (2006) Nanotechnology definition. National Science Foundation, Varlington VA, http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/omb_nifty50.jsp Nordmann A (2004) Collapse of distance. Epistemic strategies of science and technoscience, http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/ZIF/FG/2006Application/PDF/Nordmann_essay2.pdf Nordmann A (2005) Noumenal technology: reflections on the incredible tininess of nano. In: Techné 8: 1–20 Nordmann A (2007a) No future for nanotechnology? Historical development vs. global expansion. In: Jotterand F (ed) Nanotechnology and nanoethics: framing the field. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 43–63 Nordmann A (2007b) Design choices in the nanoworld: a space odyssey. In: Deblonde M, Goorden L et al.: Nano researchers facing choices. In: Timmerman C, Segaert B (eds) The Dialogue Series, Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignatius Antwerpen 10: 13–30 Nordmann A (2007c) If and then: a critique of speculative NanoEthics. In Nanoethics 1.1: 31–46 Nordmann A, Schwarz AE (2009) The lure of the “yes”: The seductive power of technoscience. In: Kaiser M, Kurath M, Maasen S, Rehmannn-Sutter C (eds) Assessment Regimes of Technology. Regulation, Deliberation & Identity Politics of Nanotechnology. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Nordmann A, Rip A (2009) Mind the gap revisited. In: Nature nanotechnology, 4: 273–274 PEN (The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies) (2008) Europe spends nearly twice as much as U.S. on Nanotech risk research. In: PEN News, 19 April 2008, http://www.nanotechproject.org/news/archive/ehs-update/ Pereira AG, Schomberg R, Funtowicz S (2007) Foresight knowledge assessment. In: International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy (IJFIP) 3(1): 53–75 Petersen A, Anderson A (2007) A question of balance or blind faith?: Scientists’ and science policymakers’ representations of the benefits and risks of nanotechnologies. In: NanoEthics 1: 243–256 Peterson M (2007) The precautionary principle should not be used as a basis for decision-making. In: EMBO Reports 8, 4: 305–308 Phoenix C, Treder M (2003) Applying the precautionary principle to nanotechnology. The Centre for Responsible Nanotechnology, January, 2003, http://www.crnano.org/precautionary.htm Pidgeon N et al (2008) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United states and United Kingdom, Nature Nanotechnology. Published Online, 7(December) Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2003) Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. In: Risk Analysis 23(5): 961–972 Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2005) Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? In: Risk Analysis 25, 1: 199–209 Popper K (1992) Quantum theory and the schism in physics. From the postscript to the logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, London Powell MC (2007) New risk or old risk, high risk or no risk? How scientists’ standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk frames. In: Health Risk Soc 9(2):173–190 President’s Council of Bioethics (2003) Beyond therapy. Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington DC. Available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/beyondtherapy/index.html Putnam H (1994) Ethics without ontology. Harvard University Press, Harvard Rip A (2001) Contributions from social studies of science and constructive technology assessment. In: Stirling A (ed) On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk. Volume II. Case Studies. Sevilla: institute for prospective technology studies (European Commission Joint Research Centre), November 2001: 94–122 Rip A (2002) Challenges for technology foresight/assessment and governance , final report of the STRATA consolidating wokshop. Brussel: European Commission, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/improving/docs/sstp_strata_workshop_session2_final.pdf Rip A (2005) Technology assessment as part of the co-evolution of nanotechnology and society: the thrust of the TA Program in NanoNed, Conference on “Nanotechnology in Science, Economy and Society”, Marburg, 13–15 January, http://www.nanoandsociety.com/ourlibrary/documents/NanNed.pdf Rip A (2006) The tension between fiction and precaution in nanotechnology. In: Fisher E, Jones J, Schomberg R (eds) Implementing the precautionary principle. Perspectives and prospects. Edwar Elgar, Cheltentham Rip A (2008a) A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance- and its ironies. In: Voss JP, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing Rip A (2008b) Discourse and practice of responsible nanotechnology development, http://www.mbs.ac.uk/research/innovation/documents/ManchesterSept08ArieRip.ppt Rip A, Shelley-Egan C (2010) Positions and responsibilities in the ‘real’ world of nanotechnology. In: von Schomberg R, Davies S (eds) Understanding public debate on nanotechnologies: options for framing public policies: A working document by the services of the European Commission. European Commission, Brussels Roco M, Bainbridge W (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology. Biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. National Science Foundation, Arlington Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2008) Novel materials in the environment: the case of nanotechnology. HMSO, London Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm Sandler R (2009) Nanotechnology: the social and ethical issues. PEN 16. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center, Project on Emerging Technologies Sandler R, Cafaro P (2005) Environmental virtue ethics. Rowman & Littlefield, New York Sarewitz D et al (2004) Science policy in its social context. In: Philosophy Today, Supplement: 67–83 Schmid G et al (2003) Small dimensions and material properties. A definition of Nanotechnology. Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler: Europäische Akademie, Graue Reihe, Nr. 35, available at: http://www.ea-aw.de/susanis/presse/pressemeldung.php_id=2.html Schomberg R (2007) From the ethics of technology to the ethics of knowledge assessment. In: Goujon P et al (eds) The information society: innovation, legitimacy, ethics and democracy. Springer, Boston, pp 39–55 Schummer J (2004) Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology: meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics. In: Techné—Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8, 2 (2004): 56–87 (reprinted in: J. Schummer, Baird D. (eds.): Nanotechnology Challenges: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2006: 413–449) Schummer J (2006) Cultural diversity in nanotechnology ethics. In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 31: 217–230 Schummer J (2007a) Identifying ethical issues of nanotechnologies. In: ten Have HAMJ (ed) Nanotechnologies, ethics and politics. UNESCO, Paris, pp 79–98 Schummer J (2007) The impact of nanotechnologies on developing countries. In: Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, Weckert J (eds) Nanoethics: examining the social impact of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken Schummer J (2008) Cultural diversity in nanotechnology ethics. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanotechnology and society. Current and emerging ethical issues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 265–280 Schummer J (2009) Nanotechnologie: Spiele mit Grenzen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Schwarz A (2004) Shrinking the ecological footprint with NanoTechnoScience? In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 203–208 Shrader-Frechette K (2007) Nanotoxicology and ethical conditions for informed consent. In: Nanoethics 1: 47–56 Siegrist M et al (2007) Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. In: Appetite 49(2): 459–466 Spagnolo A, Daloiso V (2009) Outlining ethical issues in nanotechnologies. In: Bioethics 23(7): 394–402 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007) Virtue ethics, Stanford University, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/ Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy. In: EMBO Reports 8(4): 309–315 Strand (2001) ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nanostag-elsa.pdf Sunstein CR (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Susanne C, Casado M, Buxo MJ (2005) What challenges offers nanotechnology to bioethics? In: Law and the human genome review 22: 27–45 Swiestra T, Rip A (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. In: Nanoethics 1(1): 3–20 SWISS RE (2004) Small matters. Many unknowns. Available at http://www.swissre.com/pws/research%20publications/risk%20and%20expertise/risk%20perception/nanotechnology%20-%20small%20matter%20many%20unknowns%20pdf%20page.html Tickner J (1999) A map toward precautionary decision-making. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner J (eds) Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Island, Washington UNESCO (2006) The ethics and politics of nanotechnology. UNESCO, Geneva Van Lente H (2000) Forceful futures: from promise to requirement. In: Brown N, Rappert B, Webster A (eds) Contested futures: a sociology of prospective techno-science. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 43–63 Van Lente H, Rip A (1998) Expectations in technological developments: an example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency. In: Disco C, van der Meulen BJR (eds) Getting new technologies together. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 195–220 Walker RL, Ivanhoe PJ (eds) (2007) Working virtue. Oxford University Press, Oxford What Do You Care What Other People Think?: Further Adventures of a Curious Character by Richard Feynman (1988) Wickson F (2008) Narratives of nature and nanotechnology. In: Nature Nanotechnology 3: 313–315 Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London Woods S, Jones R, Geldart A (2003) The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology. UK: Report to the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). ESRC, London Wullweber J (2006) Der mythos nanotechnologie. Die Entstehung einer neuen Inwertsetzungstechnologie. In: Peripherie—Zeitschrift für Politik und Ökonomie, 101/102: 99–118 Wullweber J (2008) Nanotechnology—an empty signifier à venir? A delineation of a techno-socio-economical Innovation Strategy. Iin: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 4 (1): 27–45 Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation: expert discourse of risk and ethics on GMOs. In: Science as Culture 10(1): 1–40 Wynne B (2006) What could the Foundations of NanoBioInfoethics be? Some lateral thoughts. Paper presented at the the Avignon-Stanford Meeting, 17–18th December 2006, available at: http://ica.stanford.edu/france/conferences/workingpapersseries/ethics Ziman JM (1994) Prometheus bound: science in a dynamic steady state. University of Chicago Press, Chicago