Development of timber framed firms in the construction sector — Is EU policy one source of their innovation?

Forest Policy and Economics - Tập 12 - Trang 199-206 - 2010
Saana Tykkä1, Denise McCluskey2, Tomas Nord3, Pekka Ollonqvist4, Mårten Hugosson2, Anders Roos2, Kadri Ukrainski5, Anders Q. Nyrud6, Fahrudin Bajric7
1Environmental and Natural Resource Policy, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Feistmantelstraße 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria
2Department of Forest Products, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7008, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
3Industrial Marketing, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
4Managerial Economics and Entrepreneurship, Finnish Forest Research Institute PB 68, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland
5Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, Narva Rd. 4-A211, 51009 Tartu, Estonia
6Norsk Treteknisk Institutt, P.O. Box 113, Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway
7The Economics, Energy and Prospective Department of the Technological Institute for Forestry, Cellulose, Construction Timber and Furniture, 10 avenue Saint Mandé, 75012 Paris, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ansoff H. I., 1979. Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-333-19686-4. Arts, 2004, 37, 339 Björnfot, A. 2006. An exploration of lean thinking for multi-stprey timber housing construction — contemporary Swedish practices and future opportunities. LTU-DT 06/51, Doctoral thesis. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå. Blayse, 2004, Key Influences on Construction Innovation, Construction Innovation, 4, 1, 10.1191/1471417504ci073oa Bregulla, 2003, Barriers to the enhanced use of wood in Europe: particular attention to the regulatory barriers Boverket, 1993. Boverkets ByggRegler. BFS 1993:57 BBR1. The National Board of Housing Building and Planning, Karlskrona. 2004, Roadmap 2010 for the European woodworking industries Drucker, 1985 Drucker, 1998, Management's New Paradigms, Forbes, 162, 152 Eckhardt, 2003, Opportunities and entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, 29, 333, 10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00225-8 Edquist, 2004, Systems of Innovation — A Critical Review of the State of the Art Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550. Elenkov, D.S., M.I. Manev, 2005. Top Management Leadership and Influence on Innovation: The Role of Sociocultural Context, in Journal of Management, vol. 31; 381–401, Southern Management Association. Sage Publications. 2006 EU Council Directive 89/106., 1988. EU Council Directive 93/68. 1993. EU Regulation (EC) No. 1882/2003., 2003. EUROCONSTRUCT, 2007. European construction market trends to 2010: Country reports. 64th EUROCONSTRUCT conference, 22–23 November, Vienna Austria. Ghemawat, 2001 Gustavsson, 2006, Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials, Building and Environment., 41, 940, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.008 Galli, 1997, paradigmatic shift in national innovation systems Goodier, 2007, Future opportunities for offsite in the UK, Construction Management and Economics, 25, 585, 10.1080/01446190601071821 Hamel, 1998, The challenge today: changing the rules of the game, Business Strategy Review, 9, 19, 10.1111/1467-8616.00062 Höök, M., 2008. Lean culture in Industrialized Housing — a study of Timber Volume Element Prefabrication. LTU-DT-08/21. Doctoral thesis. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå. Itard, 2008 Kaufmann, 2001, Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems, Research Policy, 30, 791, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00118-9 Lättemäe, R., Touart, K., 2006, Eesti eluasemeturu struktuur ja areng, Kroon ja Majandus, 2: 34–39, in Estonian. Lundvall, 1992 Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, 2008 National Housing Development Plan 2008–2013. [http://www.mkm.ee/index.php?id=1733], in Estonian. Collected at 2009 04 21. Ministry of Environmental Affairs, 2003. The Strategy of Estonian Forestry to 2010, [http://www.envir.ee/metsandus/arengukava/arengukava.html] in Estonian. Collected at 2009 04 21. Nord, T., 2008. Prefabrication strategies in the timber housing industry — a comparison of Swedish and Austrian markets. LTU-DT-08/51, doctoral thesis. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå. Näringsdepartementet, 2004. Mer trä i byggandet — Underlag för en nationell strategi att främja användning av trä i byggandet. Ds2004:1. Fritzes Offentliga publikationer. ISSN 0284-6012. 2005 Oidermaa, E., 2004. Ehituspoliitika ja Eesti ehitusseadusandluse areng Euroopa Liiduga liitumise kontekstis, Eesti Majanduspoliitilised perspektiivid Euroopa Liidus. XII teadus- ja koolituskonverentsi ettekanded-artiklid,461–471, in Estonian. Pan, 2007, Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction, Construction Management and Economics., 25, 183, 10.1080/01446190600827058 Patton, 1990 2003, Modern methods of house building Prahalad, 2004, The Blinders of Dominant Logic, Long Range Planning, 37, 171, 10.1016/j.lrp.2004.01.010 Pries, F., Janszen, F., 1995. Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the environment. Construction Management and Economics 13 (1), 43–51. Puurakentaminen, 2000. VTT julkaisuja. Rametsteiner, E., Weiss, G., Ollonqvist, P., Slee, B., 2009. Policy Integration and Coordination: the Case of Innovation and the Forest Sector in Europe. COST Action E51. OPOCE, Luxembourg. Roos, A., Woxblom, L., McCluskey, D.R., 2008. Architects’, and Building Engineers’, and Stakeholders’ Perceptions to Wood in Construction – Results from a Qualitative study. In: Bergseng, E., Delbeck, G., Hoen H.-F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Norway April, 2008. Scandinavian Forest Economics No. 42, 2008. pp. 184–194. Sardén, Y., 2005. Complexity and learning in timber frame housing - The case of a solid wood pilot project. LTU-DT-05/43, doctoral thesis Luleå University of Technology, Luleå. Seaden, 2001, Public policy and construction innovation, Building Research & Information, 29, 182, 10.1080/09613210010027701 Senge, 1990, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation Shane, 2000, The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research, Academy of Management Review, 25, 217 Sheridan, L., Visscher, H.J., Meijer, F.M., 2003. Building regulations in Europe part 2: a comparison of technical requirements in eight European Countries, Delft University Press, Delft. Silverman, 2000 Simmie, 2004, 41, 1095 SOU, 2002. Skärpning Gubbar. Om konkurrensen, kvaliteten, kostnaderna och kompetensen i byggsektorn. Byggkommissionen, Stockholm, Finansdepartementet, Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer. SOU, 2007. Utmärkt! Samhällsbyggnad. Slutrapport från Byggkommittén. Statens Offentliga Utredningar Fi2004:15. Fritzes Förlag, Stockholm. 2009 2007 Taylor, 2004, A New Model for Systemic Innovation Diffusion in Project-based Industries Thompson, 1967 Turner, 2009, CTE The first six years Venkatraman, 1997, The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research Visscher, 2007, Dynamics of building regulations in Europe Widén K., 2006. Innovation diffusion in the construction sector. Ph.D. Thesis. Lund University. ISBN. 91-85257-93-1. Winch, 1998, Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction, Building Research and Information, Vol., 26, 268, 10.1080/096132198369751 Winch, G., 2000. Construction business systems in the European Union. Building Research & Information 28 (2), 88–97. Womack, J.P., Jones D.T., Roos D., 1991. The machine that changed the world: the story of lean production. Harper Perennial, New York. Yin, 2003