Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000
Berkman, 2011, Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review, Ann Intern Med, 155, 97, 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
Dewalt, 2004, Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature, J Gen Intern Med, 19, 1228, 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x
Keller, 2008, Impact of health literacy on health outcomes in ambulatory care patients: a systematic review, Ann Pharmacother, 42, 1272, 10.1345/aph.1L093
2004
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006
Brach, 2012
Baker, 2006, The meaning and the measure of health literacy, J Gen Intern Med, 21, 878, 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00540.x
Rudd, 2003, Objective 11-2. Improvement of health literacy
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2010
Pfizer Clear Health Communication Initiative, 2004
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2010
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2012
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2013
National Institutes of Health, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2013
Friedman, 2006, A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information, Health Educ Behav, 33, 352, 10.1177/1090198105277329
Doak, 1996
Helitzer, 2009, Health literacy demands of written health information materials: an assessment of cervical cancer prevention materials, Cancer Control, 16, 70, 10.1177/107327480901600111
Clayton, 2009, TEMPtEd: development and psychometric properties of a tool to evaluate material used in patient education, J Adv Nurs, 65, 2229, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05049.x
Charnock, 1999, DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices, J Epidemiol Commun Health, 53, 105, 10.1136/jech.53.2.105
Northwest Territories Literacy Council. A plain language audit toolkit. 2008. Available from http://www.nald.ca/library/learning/nwt/auditool/audit.pdf [accessed 23.08.13]
Smith, 2008
Literacy Partners of Manitoba, 2004
Kaphingst, 2012, Health Literacy INDEX: development, reliability, and validity of a new tool for evaluating the health literacy demands of health information materials, J Health Commun, 17, 203, 10.1080/10810730.2012.712612
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013
Fleiss, 1971, Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters, Psychol Bull, 76, 378, 10.1037/h0031619
Cohen, 1960, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educ Psychol Meas, 20, 37, 10.1177/001316446002000104
Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310
Gwet, 2010, Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement, Br J Math Stat Psychol, 61, 29, 10.1348/000711006X126600
Feinstein, 1990, High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes, J Clin Epidemiol, 43, 543, 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
Nurss, 2001
Parker, 1995, The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills, J Gen Intern Med, 10, 537, 10.1007/BF02640361
Stata 11.2, MP-Parallel ed. [Computer software], College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2011.
Davis, 2006, Low literacy impairs comprehension of prescription drug warning labels, J Gen Intern Med, 21, 847, 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00529.x
Stenner, 1988
Wolf, 2009, Variability in pharmacy interpretations of physician prescriptions, Med Care, 47, 370, 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818af91a