Development of multimode gas-fired combined-cycle chemical-looping combustion-based power plant layouts

Abad A, Adánez J, García-Labiano F, Diego LFD, Gayán P, Celaya J (2007) Mapping of the range of operational conditions for Cu-, Fe-, and Ni-based oxygen carriers in chemical-looping combustion. Chem Eng Sci 62:533–549 Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P. Diego LFD (2012) Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:215–82 Adanez J, Garcia-Labiano F, DiegoLFD, Gayan P, Celaya J, Abad A (2006) Nickel-copper oxygen carriers to reach zero CO and H2 emissions in chemical-looping combustion. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:2617–2625 Adanez J, Gayan P, Celaya J, de Diego LF, Garcia-Labiano F, Abad A (2006) Chemical looping combustion in a 10kWth prototype using a CuO/Al2O3 oxygen carrier: effect of operating conditions on methane combustion. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:6075–6080 Alam S, Kumar JP, Rani KY, Sumana C (2020) Comparative assessment of performances of different oxygen carriers in a chemical looping combustion coupled intensified reforming process through simulation study-a review. J Clean Prod 262:121146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121146 Barin I (1989) Thermochemical data of pure substances, part II. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation New York Basavaraj RJ, Jayanti S (2015) Syngas-fueled, chemical-looping combustion-based power plant lay-out for clean energy generation. Clean Technol and Environ Policy 17:237–247 Basavaraja RJ, Jayanti S (2015a) Comparative analysis of four gas-fired, carbon capture-enabled power plant lay-outs. J Clean Technol and Environ 17:2143–2156 Basavaraja RJ, Jayanti S (2015b) Viability of fuel switching of a gas-fired power plant operating in chemical-looping combustion mode. Energy 81:213–221 Barros do Nascimento RA, Pimenta de Macedo H, Melo DM, Santiago RC, Rodrigues de Araújo T, Medeiros RL, Adánez J (2022) Structure and reactivity of Brazilian iron ores as low-cost oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion. Ind Eng Chem Res 61(6):2469–2482 Blas L, Dutournié P, Dorge S, Josien L, Kehrli D et al (2016) Thermal stability study of NiAl2O4 binders for chemical looping combustion application. Fuel 182:50–56 Brandvoll O, Bolland O (2004) Inherent CO2 capture by using chemical looping combustion in a natural gas fired power cycle. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 126:316–321 Davison J, Thambimuthu K (2009) An overview of technologies and costs for carbon dioxide capture in power plants. Proc I Mech E Part a: J Power Energy 223:201–212 El-Wakil, Mohamed M. Power plant technology. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill; 2010, India Erlach B, Schmidt M, Tsatsaronis G (2011) Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion. Energy 36:3804–3815 Finkenrath M (2011) Cost and performance of carbon dioxide capture from power generation. Paris, France:IEA 2011 Garcia-Labiano F, Adanez J, Diego LFD, Gayan P, Abad A (2006) Effect of Pressure on the Behavior of Copper-, Iron-, and Nickel-Based Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion Energy Fuels 1:26–33 Ghoniem AF (2011) Needs, resources and climate change: clean and efficient conversion technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 37:15–51 Goto K, Yogo K, Higashii T (2013) A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture. Appl Energy 111:710–720 Hu J, Chen S, Xiang W (2021) Ni, Co and Cu-promoted iron-based oxygen carriers in methane-fueled chemical looping hydrogen generation process. Fuel Proc Techn 221:106917 IEA (2016) IEA statistics: CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Int Ener Agen Paris, France IEA (2021) Net zero by 2050, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland IPCC (2021) Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Ishida M, Zheng D, Akehata T (1987) Evaluation of a chemical-looping combustion power-generation system by graphic exergy analysis. Energy 2:147–154 Ishida M, Jin H (1994) A new advanced power-generation system using chemical-looping combustion. Energy 19:415–422 Joshi A, Shah V, Mohapatra P, Kumar S, Joshi RK, Kathe M, Qin L, Tong A, Fan LS (2021) Chemical looping-a perspective on the next-gen technology for efficient fossil fuel utilization. Advances in Applied Energy 3:100044 Jayanti S, Saravanan V, and Sivaji S (2012) Assessment of retrofitting possibility of an Indian pulverized coal boiler for operation with Indian coals in oxy-coal combustion mode with CO2 sequestration. Proc I Mech E Part A: J Power Energy 226:1003–1013 Jenni KE, Baker ED, Nemet JF (2013) Expert elicitations of energy penalties for carbon capture technologies. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 12:136–145 Jin H, Ishida M (2001) Reactivity study on a novel hydrogen fueled chemical-looping combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:889–894 Kehlhofer RH (1999) Combined cycle gas and steam turbine power plants. 2nd ed. Oklahoma: Penn Well Knacke O, Kubaschewski O, Hesselmann K (1991) Thermochemical properties of inorganic substances. Springer Berlin Khan MN, Chiesa P, Cloete S, Amini S (2020) Integration of chemical looping combustion for cost-effective CO2 capture from state-of-the-art natural gas combined cycles. Ener Conver Manage 7:100044 Kvamsdal HM, Jordal K, Bolland O (2007) A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture. Energy 32:10–24 Lewis WK, Gilliand ER (1954) Production of pure carbon dioxide. US Patent 2665972 Linderholm C, Abad A, Lyngfelt A, Mattisson T (2008) 160 h of chemical-looping combustion in a 10 kW reactor system with a NiO-based oxygen carrier. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2:520–530 Linderholm C, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A (2009) Long-term integrity testing of spray dried particles in a 10kW chemical-looping combustor using natural gas as fuel. Fuel 88:2083–2096 Masson‐Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M (2021) Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press Naqvi R (2006) Analysis of natural gas-fired power cycles with chemical looping combustion for CO2 capture. PhD Thesis. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU); 2006 Naqvi R, Wolf J, Bolland O (2007) Part load analysis of a chemical looping combustion combined cycle for CO2 capture. Energy 32:360–370 Navajas et al (2019) Life cycle assessment of natural gas fuelled power plants based on chemical looping combustion technology. Ener Convers Manage 111856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111856 Nayef G, Redhouane H (2010) Principles of chemical engineering processes. CRC press New York Ooi REH, Foo DCY, Tan RR (2014) Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems. Appl Energy 113:477–487 Petrescu L, Cormos C-C (2017) Environmental assessment of IGCC power plants with pre-combustion CO2 capture by chemical & calcium looping methods. J Clean Production 158:233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.011 Qasim M, Ayoub M, Ghazali NA, Aqsha A, Ameen M (2021) Recent advances and development of various oxygen carriers for the chemical looping combustion process: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 60(24):8621–8641 Rajabi M, Mehrpooya M, Haibo Z, Huang Z (2019) Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: a critical review. Appl Energy 253:113544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113544 Richter HJ, Knoche KF (1983) Reversibility of combustion processes. ACS Sympos Ser 71–85 Song C, Liu Q, Deng S, Li H, Kitamura Y (2019) Cryogenic-based CO2 capture technologies: state-of-the-art developments and current challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 101:265–278 Surywanshi GD, Patnaikuni VS, Vooradi R, Kakunuri M (2021) CO2 capture and utilization from supercritical coal direct chemical looping combustion power plant – comprehensive analysis of different case studies. Appl Ener 304:117915 Tijani MM, Aqsha A, Mahinpey N (2017) Synthesis and study of metal-based oxygen carriers(Cu, Co, Fe, Ni) and their interaction with supported metal oxides (Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2, ZrO2) in a chemical looping combustion system, Energy 138:873–882 Tola V, Pettinau A (2014) Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage : a techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies. Appl Energy 113:1461–1474 Vasudevan S, Farooq S, Karimi IA, Saeys M, Quah MC, Agrawal R (2016) Energy penalty estimates for CO2 capture: comparison between fuel types and capture-combustion modes. Energy 103:709–714 Wall TF (2007) Combustion processes for carbon capture. Proc Combust Inst 31:31–47 Wang F, Deng S, Zhao J, Zhao JP, Yang GH, Yan JY (2017) Integrating geothermal into coal-fired power plant with carbon capture: a comparative study with solar energy. Energy Convers Manag 148:569–582 Wang F, Zhao J, Zhang H, Miao H, Zhao JP, Wang JT et al (2018) Efficiency evaluation of a coal-fired power plant integrated with chilled ammonia process using an absorption refrigerator. Appl Energy 230:267–276 Wang X, Shao Y, Jin B (2021) Thermodynamic evaluation and modelling of an auto-thermal hybrid system of chemical looping combustion and air separation for power generation coupling with CO2 cycle. Energy 236:121431 Winslow AM (1977) Numerical model of coal gasification in a packed bed. Symposium (international) on combustion 16:503–513 Wolf J (2004) CO2 Mitigation in advanced power cycles- chemical looping combustion and steam-based gasification. Doct Thes: Royal Insti Technol 2004 Xiao R, Song QL, Zhang SA, Zheng WG, Yang YC (2010) Pressurized chemical-looping combustion of Chinese bituminous coal: cyclic performance and characterization of iron ore-based oxygen carrier. Energy Fuel 24:1449–1463 Xiao R, Chen LY, Saha C, Zhang S, Bhattacharya S (2012) Pressurized chemical-looping combustion of coal using an iron ore as oxygen carrier in a pilot-scale unit. Int J Greenh Gas Control 10:363–373 Zang G, Jia J, Tejasvi S, Ratner A, Lora ES (2018) Lora. Techno-economic comparative analysis of biomass integrated gasification combined cycles with and without CO2 capture. Int J Greenho Gas Cont 78:73–84 Zhang H, Hong H, Jiang Q, Jin H, Kang Q (2018) Development of a chemical-looping combustion reactor having porous honeycomb chamber and experimental validation by using NiO/NiAl2O4. Appl Ener 211:259–268 Zhao YJ, Duan YY, Liu Q, Cui Y, Mohamed U et al (2021) Life cycle energy-economy-environmental evaluation of coal-based CLC power plant vs. IGCC, USC and oxy-combustion power plants with/without CO2 capture. J Environ Chem Eng 9(5):106121 Zheng M, Shen L, Feng X (2014) In situ gasification chemical looping combustion of a coal using the binary oxygen carrier natural anhydrite ore and natural iron ore. Energy Convers Manag 83:270–283