Development of ST:REAM: a reach‐based stream power balance approach for predicting alluvial river channel adjustment

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms - Tập 40 Số 3 - Trang 403-413 - 2015
Chris Parker1, Colin R. Thorne2, Nicholas J. Clifford3
1Department of Geography and Environmental Management, Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK
2School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
3Department of Geography, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractRiver channel sediment dynamics are important in integrated catchment management because changes in channel morphology resulting from sediment transfer have important implications for many river functions. However, application of existing approaches that account for catchment‐scale sediment dynamics has been limited, largely due to the difficulty in obtaining data necessary to support them. It is within this context that this study develops a new, reach‐based, stream power balance approach for predicting river channel adjustment.The new approach, named ST:REAM (sediment transport: reach equilibrium assessment method), is based upon calculations of unit bed area stream power (ω) derived from remotely sensed slope, width and discharge datasets. ST:REAM applies a zonation algorithm to values of ω that are spaced every 50 m along the catchment network in order to divide the branches of the network up into relatively homogenous reaches. ST:REAM then compares each reach's ω value with the ω of its upstream neighbour in order to predict whether or not the reach is likely to be either erosion dominated or deposition dominated.The paper describes the application of ST:REAM to the River Taff in South Wales, UK. This test study demonstrated that ST:REAM can be rapidly applied using remotely sensed data that are available across many river catchments and that ST:REAM correctly predicted the status of 87.5% of sites within the Taff catchment that field observations had defined as being either erosion or deposition dominated. However, there are currently a number of factors that limit the usefulness of ST:REAM, including inconsistent performance and the need for additional, resource intensive, data to be collected to both calibrate the model and aid interpretation of its results. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/521527

10.3133/pp422I

10.1098/rspa.1986.0059

BarkerDM.2008.A new approach for determining downstream change in river flood power at a catchment scale based on the Flood Estimation Handbook and NextMap Britain DEM. PhD Dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering and School of Geography Earth and Environmental Sciences ‐ University of Birmingham Birmingham.

10.1002/esp.1723

10.1002/esp.3425

10.1002/rra.2717

BrunnerGW.2006.HEC‐RAS River Analysis System Version 4.0 User's Manual.

10.1130/0016-7606(1979)90<453:TOCPIS>2.0.CO;2

CEH.2014.National River Flow Archive ‐ 57003 Taff at Tongwynlais.http://www.ceh.ac.uk/data/nrfa/data/station.html?57003[1 February 2014].

10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.04.011

EA.2014.Environment Agency HiFlows‐UK ‐ Taff at Tongwynlais (57003).http://www.environment‐agency.gov.uk/hiflows/station.aspx?57003[13 February 2014].

Edina.2014.Digimap Ordnance Survery Help.http://digimap.edina.ac.uk/webhelp/os/osdigimaphelp.htm#data_information/os_products/[25 January 2014].

EU.2000.Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy.

Exner FM, 1925, Uber die wechselwirkung zwischen wasser und geschiebe in flussen, Sitzungber der Akademie der Wissenscaften, 134, 165

GibsonSA LittleCDJ.2006.Implementation of the sediment impact assessment model (SIAM) in HEC‐RAS. 8th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference. Federal Interagency Subcommittee on Sedimentation; 65–72.

Gill D, 1970, Application of a statistical zonation method to reservoir evaluation and digitized‐log analysis, Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 54, 719

10.1111/j.1467-8306.1983.tb01423.x

10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<1342:TADOPC>2.3.CO;2

10.1002/esp.3290160711

10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00139-9

10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00161-3

ISIS, 1999, ISIS Sediment User Manual

10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.012

10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00015-X

Lane EW, 1955, The importance of fluvial morphology in hydraulic engineering, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 81, 1

10.1002/esp.479

10.1002/esp.1404

Lawler DM, 1992, Lowland Floodplain Rivers: Geomorphological Perspectives, 117

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199905)13:7<977::AID-HYP785>3.0.CO;2-5

10.1111/1467-8306.00064

10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025261.79761.b3

10.1016/0169-555X(92)90014-F

10.1002/esp.440

10.1002/esp.1430

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:5(366)

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:2(134)

10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x

10.1002/rra.1568

10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.027

10.1016/j.geomorph.2003.10.003

10.1002/rra.1243

10.1002/esp.1128

Schumm SA, 1969, River metamorphosis, Journal of the Hydraulics Division ‐ ASCE, 95, 255, 10.1061/JYCEAJ.0001938

10.1002/esp.3290200706

Sear DA, 2003, Guidebook of Applied Fluvial Geomorphology

10.1680/gafg.34846

10.1023/A:1003485021076

10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00672-0

10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00421-2

ThorneCR HenshawA BatesP BrownD CoulthardTJ GurnellA LewinJ LongfieldS MaasG MacklinMG NewsonM NicholasAP ParkerC ReesJ SearD SurendranS WalkerJ WarburtonJ.2010a.Applied fluvial geomorphology for sustainable flood risk management. DEFRA Annual Flood and Coastal Risk Management Conference.

10.1002/9781444324846.ch5

10.1002/rra.1523

Wallerstein NP, 2006, River Flow 2006

Wharton G, 1995, Changing River Channels, 442

10.1029/1999JB900120

Wobus C, 2006, Tectonics from topography: procedures, promise, and pitfalls, Special papers of the Geological Society of America, 398, 55

10.1086/626637