Development and validation of a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of 39 mycotoxins in wheat and maize

Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry - Tập 20 Số 18 - Trang 2649-2659 - 2006
Michael Sulyok1, Franz Berthiller1, Rudolf Krska1, Rainer Schuhmacher1
1Christian Doppler Laboratory for Mycotoxin Research, Department IFA-Tulln, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Konrad Lorenzstr. 20, A-3430 Tulln, Austria

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis paper describes the first validated method for the determination of 39 mycotoxins in wheat and maize using a single extraction step followed by liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC/ESI‐MS/MS) without the need for any clean‐up. The 39 analytes included A‐ and B‐trichothecenes (including deoxynivalenol‐3‐glucoside), zearalenone and related derivatives, fumonisins, enniatins, ergot alkaloids, ochratoxins, aflatoxins and moniliformin. The large number and the chemical diversity of the analytes required the application of the positive as well as the negative ion ESI mode in two consecutive chromatographic runs of 21 min each. The solvent mixture acetonitrile/water/acetic acid 79 + 20 + 1 (v/v/v) has been determined as the best compromise for the extraction of the analytes from wheat and maize. Raw extracts were diluted 1 + 1 and were injected without any clean‐up. Ion‐suppression effects due to co‐eluting matrix components were negligible in the case of wheat, whereas significant signal suppression for 12 analytes was observed in maize, causing purely proportional systematic errors. Method performance characteristics were determined after spiking blank samples on multiple levels in triplicate. Coefficients of variation of the overall process of <5.1% and <3.0% were obtained for wheat and maize, respectively, from linear calibration data. Limits of detection ranged from 0.03 to 220 µg/kg. Apparent recoveries (including both the recoveries of the extraction step and matrix effects) were within the range of 100 ± 10% for approximately half of the analytes. In extreme cases the apparent recoveries dropped to about 20%, but this could be compensated for to a large extent by the application of matrix‐matched standards to correct for matrix‐induced signal suppression, as only a few analytes such as nivalenol and the fumonisins exhibited incomplete extraction. For deoxynivalenol and zearalenone, the trueness of the method was confirmed through the analysis of certified reference materials. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00471-1

10.1128/CMR.16.3.497-516.2003

Kuiper‐Goodman T, 1998, Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins – Developments in Chemistry, Toxicology and Food Safety, 25

Krska R, 2001, Anal. Bioanal. Chem, 371, 285

10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00604-0

10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00059-0

10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.04.046

10.1002/jat.1117

10.1111/j.1439-0450.1990.tb01052.x

10.1021/jf010802t

10.1021/jf047798g

10.1002/rcm.2030

Sorensen LK, 2005, J. Chromatogr. B, 820, 183, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.03.020

10.1002/rcm.1019

10.1080/02652030500110923

10.1016/j.chroma.2004.11.011

10.1002/rcm.2373

10.1021/ac020361s

10.1002/rcm.908

10.1080/02652030500158617

10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00462-2

10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.031

SpanjerM RensenP ScholtenJ.The World Mycotoxin Forum – The Third Conference; Book of abstracts p.48; Noordwijk The Netherlands 10–11 November2005.

10.1002/rcm.2460

10.1021/jf051501c

10.1080/02652030410001711304

10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00698-2

10.1080/02652030500089861

10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00957-3

10.1021/jf0115037

10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.004

10.1002/mnfr.200500230

10.1007/s00216-005-0218-z

10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00821-3

10.1055/s-1992-26306

10.1351/pac200274112201

WegscheiderW RohrerC NeuböckR.Validata (Excel‐Makro zur Methodenvalidierung) version 3.02 48 1999.

Commission Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results Brussels 2002.

10.1002/jms.933

10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00272-3

Commission Regulation 856/2005/EC Brussels 2005.

Commission Regulation 472/2002/EC Brussels 2002.

Commission Regulation 1525/98/EC Brussels 1998.

Commission Regulation 2174/2003/EC Brussels 2003.