Development and testing of a rapid method for measuring shoal size discrimination
Tóm tắt
The shoal-choice test is a popular method to investigate quantity discrimination in social fish based on their spontaneous preference for the larger of two shoals. The shoal-choice test usually requires a long observation time (20–30 min), mainly because fish switch between the two shoals with low frequency, thus reducing the possibilities of comparison. This duration limits the use of the shoal-choice test for large-scale screenings. Here, we developed a new version of the shoal-choice test in which the subject was confined in a large transparent cylinder in the middle of the tank throughout the experiment to bound the minimum distance from the stimulus shoals and favour switching. We tested the new method by observing guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in a 4 versus 6 fish discrimination (experiment 1). The new method allowed for a faster assessment of the preference for the larger shoal (<5 min), resulting in potential application for large population screenings. Guppies switched five times more frequently between the two shoals and remained close to the first chosen shoal ten times less compared to experiments with the old method. In experiment 2, we found that with the new method guppies were able to discriminate up to 5 versus 6 fish, a discrimination that was not achieved with the classical method. This last result indicates that minor methodological modifications can lead to very different findings in the same species and suggests that caution should be exercised when interpreting inter-specific differences in quantitative abilities.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agrillo C, Bisazza A (2014) Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals. J Neurosci Methods 234:82–91
Agrillo C, Dadda M (2007) Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus falcatus. Ethol Ecol Evol 19:145–157
Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70
Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G (2008) Choice of female groups by male mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Ethology 114:479–488
Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2009) Use of number by fish. PLoS One 4:e4786
Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A, Butterworth B (2012) Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies. PLoS One 7:e31923
Bisazza A, Butterworth B, Piffer L, Bahrami B, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C (2014a) Collective enhancement of numerical acuity by meritocratic leadership in fish. Sci Rep 4:4560
Bisazza A, Agrillo C, Lucon-Xiccato T (2014b) Extensive training extends numerical abilities of guppies. Anim Cogn 17:1413–1419
Brembs B, Heisenberg M (2000) The operant and the classical in conditioned orientation of Drosophila melanogaster at the flight simulator. Learn Mem 7:104–115
Cachat J, Stewart A, Grossman L, Gaikwad S, Kadri F, Chung KM et al (2010) Measuring behavioral and endocrine responses to novelty stress in adult zebrafish. Nat Protoc 5:1786–1799
Chandroo KP, Duncan IJ, Moccia RD (2004) Can fish suffer? Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Appl Anim Behav Sci 86:225–250
Chittka L, Skorupski P, Raine NE (2009) Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol Evol 24:400–407
Cote J, Fogarty S, Sih A (2012) Individual sociability and choosiness between shoal types. Anim Behav 83:1469–1476
Dadda M, Piffer L, Agrillo C, Bisazza A (2009) Spontaneous number representation in mosquitofish. Cognition 112:343–348
Dadda M, Agrillo C, Bisazza A, Brown C (2015) Laterality enhances numerical skills in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Front Behav Neurosci 9:285
Gatto E, Lucon-Xiccato T, Savaşçı BB, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2016) Experimental setting affects the performance of guppies in a numerical discrimination task. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1037-7
Giurfa M, Schubert M, Reisenman C, Gerber B, Lachnit H (2003) The effect of cumulative experience on the use of elemental and configural visual discrimination strategies in honeybees. Behav Brain Res 145:161–169
Gómez-Laplaza LM (2006) Shoal choice in juvenile angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare): effects of social status and activity. Ethol Ecol Evol 18:261–273
Gómez-Laplaza LM, Gerlai R (2011) Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber’s law. Anim Cogn 14:1–9
Gómez-Laplaza LM, Gerlai R (2012) Activity counts: the effect of swimming activity on quantity discrimination in fish. Front Psychol 3:484
Hager MC, Helfman GS (1991) Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:271–276
Hoare DJ, Couzin ID, Godin JG, Krause J (2004) Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Anim Behav 67:155–164
Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Krause J, Godin JGJ, Rubenstein D (1998) Group choice as a function of group size differences and assessment time in fish: the influence of species vulnerability to predation. Ethology 104:68–74
Lindström K, Ranta E (1993) Social preferences by male guppies, Poecilia reticulata, based on shoal size and sex. Anim Behav 46:1029–1031
Lucon-Xiccato T, Dadda M (2016a) Individual guppies differ in quantity discrimination performance across antipredator and foraging contexts. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (accepted manuscript)
Lucon-Xiccato T, Dadda M (2016b) Guppies show behavioural but not cognitive sex differences in a novel object recognition test. PLoS One 11:e0156589
Lucon-Xiccato T, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2016) Sex differences in discrimination of shoal size in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 122:481–491
Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1987) Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator-evasion behaviour in minnow shoals. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 229:439–465
Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C (2016) Turning to the larger shoal: are there individual differences in small-and large-quantity discrimination of guppies? Ethol Ecol Evol 28:211–220
Mühlhoff N, Stevens JR, Reader SM (2011) Spatial discounting of food and social rewards in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Front Psychol 2:68
O’Hara M, Huber L, Gajdon GK (2015) The advantage of objects over images in discrimination and reversal learning by kea, Nestor notabilis. Anim Behav 101:51–60
Patton EE, Zon LI (2001) The art and design of genetic screens: zebrafish. Nat Rev Genet 2:956–966
Plath M, Richter S, Tiedemann R, Schlupp I (2008) Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferences. Curr Biol 18:1138–1141
Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ (2005) Assortative preferences for stripes in danios. Anim Behav 70:1063–1066
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principals and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman and Company, New York
Stephens DW (2008) Decision ecology: foraging and the ecology of animal decision making. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 8:475–484
Tegeder RW, Krause J (1995) Density dependence and numerosity in fright stimulated aggregation behaviour of shoaling fish. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 350:381–390
Wickens DD, Nield AF, Tuber DS, Wickens C (1970) Classically conditioned compound-element discrimination as a function of length of training, amount of testing and CS-UCS interval. Learn Motiv 1:95–109