Development and evaluation of a facile mesh-to-surface tool for customised wheelchair cushions

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 9 Số 1
Susan Nace1, John Tiernan2, Aisling Ní Annaidh1, Dónal Holland1
1School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
2SeatTech Posture and Mobility Services, Enable Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Custom orthoses are becoming more commonly prescribed for upper and lower limbs. They require some form of shape-capture of the body parts they will be in contact with, which generates an STL file that designers prepare for manufacturing. For larger devices such as custom-contoured wheelchair cushions, the STL created during shape-capture can contain hundreds of thousands of tessellations, making them difficult to alter and prepare for manufacturing using mesh-editing software. This study covers the development and testing of a mesh-to-surface workflow in a parametric computer-aided design software using its visual programming language such that STL files of custom wheelchair cushions can be efficiently converted into a parametric single surface. Methods A volunteer in the clinical space with expertise in computer-aided design aided was interviewed to understand and document the current workflow for creating a single surface from an STL file of a custom wheelchair cushion. To understand the user needs of typical clinical workers with little computer-aided design experience, potential end-users of the process were tasked with completing the workflow and providing feedback during the experience. This feedback was used to automate part of the computer-aided design process using a visual programming tool, creating a new semi-automated workflow for mesh-to-surface translation. Both the original and semi-automated process were then evaluated by nine volunteers with varying levels of computer-aided design experience. Results The semi-automated process showed a 37% reduction in the total number of steps required to convert an STL model to a parametric surface. Regardless of previous computer-aided design experience, volunteers completed the semi-automated workflow 31% faster on average than the manual workflow. Conclusions The creation of a semi-automated process for creating a single parametric surface of a custom wheelchair cushion from an STL mesh makes mesh-to-surface conversion more efficient and more user-friendly to all, regardless of computer-aided design experience levels. The steps followed in this study may guide others in the development of their own mesh-to-surface tools in the wheelchair sector, as well as those creating other large custom prosthetic devices.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Nace S, Tiernan J, Ni Annaidh A. Manufacturing custom-contoured wheelchair seating: a state of the art review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(4):382–95.

Tasker LH, Shapcott NG, Holland PM. The use and validation of a laser scanner for computer aided design and manufacturing of wheelchair seating. J Med Eng Technol. 2011;35(6–7):377–85.

Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, Giannopoulos A, Cai T, Kumamaru K, et al. Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist. Radiographics. 2015;35:1965–88.

Fernandez-Vicente M, Escario Chust A, Conejero A, Fernandez M. Low cost digital fabrication approach for thumb orthoses. Rapid Prototyp J. 2017;23:6.

Rybicki F. The impact of regulation, reimbursement, and research on the value of 3D printing and other 3D procedures in medicine. 3D Print Med. 2022;8(1):6.

Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Wake N, Rybicki F. RadioGraphics Update: Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist. Radiographics. 2020;40(4):E21–3.

Smith R. Development of a 3D printed, custom contoured back piece for wheelchair users. Dublin: University College Dublin; 2016.

Blaya F, D’amato RO, Pedro PS, Juanes JA, Lopez-Silva JA, Lagándara JG. Study, design and prototyping of arm splint with additive manufacturing process. ACM Int Conf Proc Series. 2017;2:Part F1322-7.

Baronio G, Harran S, Signoroni A. A critical analysis of a hand orthosis reverse engineering and 3D printing process. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2016;9(2016):1–7.

Palousek D, Rosicky J, Koutny D, Stoklásek P, Navrat T. Pilot study of the wrist orthosis design process. Rapid Prototyp J. 2014;20(1):27–32.

Paterson AM, Bibb RJ, Campbell RI. Evaluation of a digitised splinting approach with multiple-material functionality using Additive Manufacturing technologies. 23rd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas, United States. 2012.

Li J, Tanaka H. Feasibility study applying a parametric model as the design generator for 3D–printed orthosis for fracture immobilization. 3D Print Med. 2018;4(1):1–15.

Li J, Tanaka H. Rapid customization system for 3D-printed splint using programmable modeling technique – a practical approach. 3D Print Med. 2018;4(1):5.

Kadakia RJ, Wixted CM, Kelly CN, Hanselman AE, Adams SB. From patient to procedure: the process of creating a custom 3D-printed medical device for foot and ankle pathology. Foot Ankle Spec. 2021;14(3):271–80.

Burnard JL, Parr WCH, Choy WJ, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ. 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(6):1248–60.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tập 9 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả