Development and Validation of the Gatekeeper Behavior Scale

Crisis - Tập 37 Số 4 - Trang 271-280 - 2016
Glenn Albright1, Jesse Davidson1, Ron Goldman2, Kristen M. Shockley3, Jane Timmons-Mitchell4
1Department of Psychology, Baruch College, City University of New York, USA
2Kognito, New York, NY, USA
3Department of Psychology, Baruch College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA
4Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education, Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract. Background: Community-based gatekeeper trainings are effective tools in increasing gatekeeper skills but few validated measures assess impact. Aims: This study aimed at determining the validity of an 11-item Gatekeeper Behavior Scale (GBS) to assess gatekeeper skills that predict behavior. Method: To validate the scale, 8,931 users were administered GBS surveys at pretraining, posttraining, and follow-up periods. The training was one of five from the suite of online At-Risk mental health learning simulations for university faculty/staff or students or high/middle school educators. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis revealed the three-factor model based on the subscales of preparedness, likelihood, and self-efficacy fit the data best. Factor loadings showed all items correlated highly with theoretical constructs (r ≥ .84, p < .001). The GBS had high internal consistency (α = 0.93). Criterion-related validity for likelihood to discuss concerns at posttraining was significantly related to approaching students believed to be in psychological distress (r = .219, p < .001). Likelihood to refer significantly correlated with the number of students referred (r = .235, p < .001). Convergent validity was established via a correlation between self-efficacy in motivating someone to seek help and general self-efficacy (r = .519, p < .001). Conclusion: The GBS appears to be a valid tool in measuring the impact of online gatekeeper training simulations and holds promise for assessing other delivery methods.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albright, J. J. & Park, H. M. (2009).Confirmatory factor analysis using Amos, LISREL, Mplus, SAS/STAT CALIS (UITS Working paper). Indiana University, Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~statmath/stat/all/cfa/index.html

10.1089/g4h.2011.0003

10.2105/AJPH.94.3.446

10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Berman A. L., 2009, School Psychology Review, 38, 233, 10.1080/02796015.2009.12087834

Burnette C., 2015, Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention: A theoretical model and review of the empirical literature

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010).Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html

10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00586.x

10.1521/suli.2007.37.2.135

10.1177/109442810141004

Crosby, A. E., Han, B., Ortega, L. A. G., Parks, S. E. & Gfoerer, J. (2011). Suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adults aged ≥18 years – United States, 2008–2009.CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (no. SS-13). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6013a1.htm

10.1521/suli.2007.37.6.659

10.1007/s10935-011-0250-z

Fischer R., 2010, International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 88, 10.21500/20112084.852

Fishbein M., 1975, Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research

10.1521/suli.31.1.5.6.2421

10.1136/bmj.308.6938.1227

Isaac M., 2009, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, 54, 260, 10.1177/070674370905400407

10.1177/1049731511436015

Kalafat J., 1996, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 25, 123, 10.1111/j.1943-278X.1995.tb00397.x

Kalafat J., 1996, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 26, 359, 10.1111/j.1943-278X.1996.tb00839.x

Kirkpatrick D. L., 1996, Training and Development, 50, 54

Kirkpatrick D. L., 2006, Evaluating training programs: The four levels, 3

10.1027/0227-5910/a000178

10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1376

Kognito. (2015).Products. Retrieved from http://www.kognito.com/products/

10.1177/0146167292181001

10.1001/jama.294.16.2064

10.1080/13811110701857491

Miller D. N., 2009, School Psychology Review, 38, 168, 10.1080/02796015.2009.12087830

Muthen, L. K. & Muthen, B. O. (2010).Mplus (Version 6)[Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

10.1080/074811897202137

10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

10.1080/07481180302906

10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.104

10.1002/jcop.21509