Developing science–industry collaborations into a transdisciplinary process: a case study on improving sustainability of pork production
Tóm tắt
Sustainability of livestock farming is not only part of intensive public debate, but also refers to a multi-stakeholder field comprising many different interests and worldviews. Beyond the environmental, economic and social dimensions of livestock farming, especially animal welfare should be considered as an essential aspect of sustainability. Such sustainability issues may be successfully addressed by transdisciplinary research. Science–industry collaborations in the realm of livestock sciences do have the potential for becoming successful transdisciplinary projects if project partners are aware of the challenges and limitations. In the light of this situation the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna and an Austrian food retailer launched a collaborative research project. The main objective of the project was to develop measures to improve sustainability of current pig fattening systems with a special focus on animal welfare. These measures were subsequently implemented on three pig fattening farms in Austria and the effects on animal welfare, economic and environmental performance as well as the farmers’ perception were evaluated. In this paper, the research process will be analysed from a transdisciplinary perspective, identifying differences between transdisciplinarity and different forms of applied research. This is followed by a discussion of challenges and failures as well as opportunities and achievements of the project concluding with a presentation of recommendations for further research projects. Finally, it is discussed to which extent industry-funded research offers suitable conditions for transdisciplinary research projects in pork production using the present project as a case study.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bammer G (2013) Disciplining interdisciplinarity integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems. Australian National University (ANU) E Press, S.l. http://epress.anu.edu.au/titles/disciplining-interdisciplinarity, 29.04.2013
Beattie VE, Walker N, Sneddon IA (1995) Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Anim Welf 4(3):207–220
Beattie VE, Breuer K, O’Connell NE, Sneddon IA, Mercer JT, Rance KA, Sutcliffe MEM, Edwards SA (2005) Factors identifying pigs predisposed to tail biting. Anim Sci 80:307–312
Boogaard BK, Boekhorst LJS, Oosting SJ, Sørensen JT (2011) Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark. Livest Sci 140(1–3):189–200. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.028
Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F, Luederitz C, Lang DJ, Newig J, Reinert F, Abson DJ, von Wehrden H (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
Cao GT, Zeng XF, Chen AG, Zhou L, Zhang L, Xiao YP, Yang CM (2013) Effects of a probiotic, Enterococcus faecium, on growth performance, intestinal morphology, immune response, and cecal microflora in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli K88. Poult Sci 92(11):2949–2955. doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03366
Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med 41(12):1667–1676. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-s
Dalgaard T, Olesen JE, Petersen SO, Petersen BM, Jørgensen U, Kristensen T, Hutchings NJ, Gyldenkærne S, Hermansen JE (2011) Developments in greenhouse gas emissions and net energy use in Danish agriculture—how to achieve substantial CO2 reductions? Environ Pollut 159(11):3193–3203. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.024
Dawkins MS (2006) A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends Ecol Evol 21(2):77–82. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.017
Flyvbjerg B (2011) Case Study. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 301–316
Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402(6761 SUPPL.):C81–C84
Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60(1):119–128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002
Hoffmann V, Probst K, Christinck A (2007) Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development? Agric Hum Values 24(3):355–368
Humer E, Rohrer E, Windisch W, Wetscherek W, Schwarz C, Jungbauer L, Schedle K (2014) Gender-specific effects of a phytogenic feed additive on performance, intestinal physiology and morphology in broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr
Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Madey DP (2014) Evaluation of a software–based intervention tool for the reduction of tail biting in German fattening pigs. Doctoral Thesis, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover
McKay J, Marshall P (2001) The dual imperatives of action research. Inf Technol People 14(1):46–59. doi:10.1108/09593840110384771
Mobjörk M (2010) Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42(8):866–873. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003
Moinard C, Mendl M, Nicol CJ, Green LE (2003) A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81(4):333–355. doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(02)00276-9
Moll P, Zander DIU (2013) Implementation-oriented and transformative research—lessons from a project on conservation and sustainable use of forest resources in Ethiopia. Environ Sci Policy 28:82–91. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.007
Mullan S, Edwards SA, Butterworth A, Ward M, Whay HR, Main DCJ (2011) Welfare science into practice: a successful case example of working with industry. Anim Welf 20(4):597–601
Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE, Mogensen L (2010) Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU. Energy Policy 38(5):2561–2571. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.051
Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Oekom Verlag, München
Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A, Fry P, Gurung GS, Schneider F, Speranza CI, Kiteme B, Boillat S, Serrano E, Hadorn GH, Urs W (2010) Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy 37(4):267–281. doi:10.3152/030234210x496628
Polk M (2015) Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures 65:110–122. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
Rigolot C, Espagnol S, Pomar C, Dourmad JY (2010) Modelling of manure production by pigs and NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions. Part I: animal excretion and enteric CH4, effect of feeding and performance. Animal 4(8):1401–1412. doi:10.1017/s1751731110000492
Russell AW, Wickson F, Carew AL (2008) Transdisciplinarity: context, contradictions and capacity. Futures 40(5):460–472. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.005
Schneider F, Ledermann T, Rist S, Fry P (2009) Social learning processes in Swiss soil protection—the ‘From Farmer—To Farmer’ project. Human Ecology 37(4):475–489. doi:10.1007/s10745-009-9262-1
Scholz RW (2000) Mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity. Transdisciplinarity: joint problem-solving among science, technology and society. Workbook II: mutual learning sessions, pp 13–17
Scholz RW (2011) Transdisciplinarity for environmental literacy. In: Scholz RW (ed) Environmental literacy in science and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 373–404
Scholz RW, Steiner G (2015) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part II—what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice?. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0327-3
Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
Scholz RW, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Walter AI, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3):226–251
Sørensen JT, Hindhede J (1997) On-farm experiments as a research method in animal welfare and health. In: Sorensen JT (ed) Livestock farming systems—more than food production. EAAP Publ, pp 267–272
Stauffacher M, Flüeler T, Krütli P, Scholz RW (2008) Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a swiss prealpine region. Syst Pract Action Res 21(6):409–422. doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7
Sutherland MA, Tucker CB (2011) The long and short of it: a review of tail docking in farm animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 135(3):179–191. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.015
Thompson PB, Appleby M, Busch L, Kalof L, Miele M, Norwood BF, Pajor E (2011) Values and public acceptability dimensions of sustainable egg production. Poult Sci 90(9):2097–2109
Tucker TW, Mench JA, von Keyserlingk MAG (2013) Animal welfare: an integral component of sustainability. In: Kebreab E (ed) Sustainable animal agriculture. CAB International, pp 42–52
van de Fliert E, Braun AR (2002) Conceptualizing integrative, farmer participatory research for sustainable agriculture: from opportunities to impact. Agric Hum Values 19(1):25–38. doi:10.1023/a:1015081030682
Verbeke W (2009) Stakeholder, citizen and consumer interests in farm animal welfare. Anim Welf 18(4):325–333
vom Brocke AL, Madey DP, Gauly M, Schrader L, Dippel S (2015) Training veterinarians and agricultural advisers on a novel tool for tail biting prevention. Veterinary Record Open 2(1). doi:10.1136/vetreco-2014-000083
Zonderland JJ, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, van Reenen CG, Bracke MBM, Kemp B, Hartog LAd, Spoolder HAM (2008) Prevention and treatment of tail biting in weaned piglets. Appl Anim Behav Sci 110(3–4):269–281. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.005